Re: [j-nsp] Juniper publishes Release notes as pdf

I think the main story here is: Offer both/different versions! Once the content is there it should be very little effort to render multiple different outputs. In the days of ancient past you could just convert each section/page of the website (including Release Notes) into a PDF

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper QFX5200-32c and QSFP28 channelized optics

Hi, While it sometimes works to let 25G transceivers run at 10G (depending on Transceiver and Device(s)) i think in this case you will need a different transceiver. See e.g. HCT for reference: https://apps.juniper.net/hct/product/?prd=QFX5200-32C the PSM only lists 25 and 100 as being

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

Am 25.10.2023 um 14:25 schrieb Aaron1: Years ago I had to get a license to make my 10g interfaces work on my MX104 If we are going into the HW direction and not features. Yes, that is correct MX104 had some Port based licensing. There was also MX5 -> MX10 -> MX40 -> MX80 And some not so

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

Am 25.10.2023 um 11:57 schrieb Xavier Beaudouin via juniper-nsp: So there are a couple of enforced licenses even on MX ... and they have always been enforced. Subscriber MGMT is one of these features. Well I remember wanted to use dhcp server on a MX204 for a local lan used only... for local

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

Am 25.10.2023 um 08:01 schrieb Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp: On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 22:21, Aaron Gould via juniper-nsp wrote: My MX304 trial license expired last night, after rebooting the MX304, various protocols no longer work. This seems more than just honor-based... ospf, ldp, etc, no

Re: [j-nsp] CVE-2023-4481

Hi, On 11.09.2023 19:55, Tom Beecher wrote: Which in theory opens a new attack vector for the future. What is the attack vector you foresee for a route sitting as hidden with the potentially offending attributes stripped off? It is theoretical, but if you do $something with a prefix

Re: [j-nsp] CVE-2023-4481

Hi, Am 30.08.2023 um 18:09 schrieb heasley via juniper-nsp: Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 03:42:41PM -0700, David Sinn via juniper-nsp: A network I operate is going with: bgp-error-tolerance { malformed-route-limit 0; } The thoughts being that there is no real reason to

Re: [j-nsp] Converting QFX3600 from QF Interconnect to standalone mode

Hi, Its been age since we needed to convert one of them. AFAIR all 3600 Nodes can be converted. The bigger Interconnect Node had no option for that. They state a couple of warnings and pre requisites in the documentation:

Re: [j-nsp] polishing an antique m7i

Hi, If you have any active support contract or a contact to an SE person they typically can provide access to old and no longer listed releases on demand as they do archive them internally. We recently had to request some 14.X code for a complicated VC upgrade procedure involving a failed

Re: [j-nsp] FlowSpec rules being installed, but not matching any traffic

Hi, I doubt that BGP Flow Spec is systested or supported on any QFX5k platform. Feature Explorer (while not perfect :)) does support me in that thinking: https://apps.juniper.net/feature-explorer/parent-feature-info.html?pFKey=1541=BGP+Flow+Specification regards Tobias

Re: [j-nsp] what's the difference between vMX and vMX evaluation?

Hi, On 22.10.2021 08:42, Chen Jiang via juniper-nsp wrote: I see there are 2 download links for vMX, one is vMX, one is vMX evaluation. What's the difference between the two? On Paper the Eval is for public Evals (https://www.juniper.net/us/en/dm/vmx-trial-download.html) and the regular

Re: [j-nsp] upgrading an antique 240

Hi, On 15.07.2021 22:46, Randy Bush via juniper-nsp wrote: Good point! TSB16735 says last version of Junos to support SCB-MX960 is 16.2 Junos 17.3R3-S10 Junos 18.4R2-S5 Junos 19.3R3-S2 Junos 19.4R3-S3 so which steps to get from 14 to 16.2? 15.x 16.2?