Am 25.10.2023 um 08:01 schrieb Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 22:21, Aaron Gould via juniper-nsp
<juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:

My MX304 trial license expired last night, after rebooting the MX304,
various protocols no longer work.  This seems more than just
honor-based... ospf, ldp, etc, no longer function.  This is new to me;
that Juniper is making protocols and technologies tied to license.  I
need to understand more about this, as I'm considering buying MX304's.

Juniper had assured me multiple times that they strategically have
decided to NEVER do this. That it's an actual decision they've
considered at the highest level, that they will not downgrade devices
in operation. I guess 'reboot' is not in-operation?

I am surprised and it goes against everything i have seen and experienced so far on any MX (including MX304).

So there are a couple of enforced licenses even on MX ... and they have always been enforced. Subscriber MGMT is one of these features.

Also some form of encryption is typically enforced due to export regulations and other silly things. Also the rare use cases where external feeds (e.g. for stateful services on services cards) might expire.

That being said, i have not yet seen any expired flex license on any MX as we typically play with perpetuals. But not having a license has never killed features like Routing Protocols, LDP or similar for me. We run the boxes in the lab without licenses regularly (because we are too lazy to (re)apply them between tests and/or wipes) including MX304 and Junos up to 23.2.

I would be very surprised if there are actually code path that kill features in Junos on purpose yet (having seen the quality of the other parts of the license parser).

So i would rather suspect some weird combination of misbehaviour and/or bug and not an intention to disable stuff for now.

The flex license nagging comes in different stages and intensity depending e.g. in HW and sometimes card Generation, which makes license mgmt a lot of "fun" in chassis with cards that "need" a license and cards that "can have" a license and cards than "do not need" a license at all :)

The SE teams (or your partner of choice) have access to the current plans of where license nagging and license installation is needed to stop the nagging and where it is optional.

I will try to get my hands on a short live trial license to replicate that behaviour soonish to look into that now :)

After all ... there is not much that surprise me any more on vendor licensing ...

regards
Tobias
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to