LinkedIn
alaerte vidali ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn:
--
Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn.
Aceptar invitación de alaerte vidali
http://www.linkedin.com/e/u96119-h1gu8lkg-52
LinkedIn
alaerte vidali ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn:
--
Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn.
Aceptar invitación de alaerte vidali
http://www.linkedin.com/e/u96119-h1gu9vop-2v
Hi,
I am getting the following behavior: an iBGP route is hidden on local router
if advertising iBGP router is ABR OSPF NSSA with no-summaries configured.
Removing the no-summaries on neighbor results the route is installed.
Now I am trying to understand why so.
Any feedback appreciated.
Hi,
When configuring two route reflectors on same clusters for redundancy
purpose, does it matter if the backup reflector is configured inside the
same group for clients?
For example:
group RRclients
type internal
cluster 1.1.1.1
neighbor client1
neighbor client2
neighbor RR2
group
I believe it is just a matter of time for Juniper having similar problems as
Cisco, like the one you pointed. Another one that came to my mind is new
software that needs to support old protocols/features that one/two company
is using worldwide.
Hope they can innovate finding a way to keep it as
Hi Thiago,
What version are you using? If want, send the config (
alaertevid...@gmail.com) and I try on mine.
I tested L3VPN recently (works fine), but I heard something about L2VPN/VPLS
does not work, as one person posted already.
Br,
Alaerte
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:08 AM,
Hi,
Any feature in Juniper to measure delay, jitter and packet loss, also
integrated with SNMP, like Cisco SAA and RTTMON
So the results of jitter, delay and packet loss can be gathered/graph
with SNMP application.
tks,
Alaerte
___
juniper-nsp
Hi,
Any advisory regarding interoperability of this feature between Juniper and
Cisco?
tks,
Alaerte
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Hi,
Any information about impact of fragmentation in Juniper CPU?
tks,
Alaerte
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Hi,
Any limitation to use Linux as server to perform reverse telnet to Juniper
M7i?
(multi-port serial card from vendor like Cyclades installed in Linux)
or console access is similar to Cisco and should work without additional
changes?
Tks,
Alaerte
Hi,
Trying to clarify Junos protection when comparing with Cisco:
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) fast reroute (FRR) refers to local
protection methods such as one-to-one and many-to-one (facility) backup. In
the general networking community, the term FRR has become a shorthand way of
Hi,
Regarding example in Juniper page about configuring multiple OSPF instances.
Is there any typo and how to place routes from voice-policy.inet.0 into
inet.0 and vice-versa?
I mean, the same command is used for both (with exception that
other-policy.inet.0 is also added).
import-rib [ inet.0
Hi,
Regarding example in Juniper page about configuring multiple OSPF instances.
Is there any typo and how to place routes from voice-policy.inet.0 into
inet.0 and vice-versa?
I mean, the same command is used for both (with exception that
other-policy.inet.0 is also added).
import-rib [ inet.0
Hi,
PIM considers source of multicast to perform load splitting when the command
ip multicast multipath is entered. When using multicast over L3 MPLS VPN,
the source IP is the IP of PEx for any customer group connected to PEx.
Any way to overcome this limitation and achieve load splitting of
Hi,
Considering the scenario, do you see a way to load balancing Layer 2 VPN
over MPLS (VPWS or old AtoM) circuits?
(that is, one xconnect takes PE1-P1-PE2 and other takes PE1-P2-PE2)
CE-PE1-P1-PE2CE2
| | |
|__P2__|
Tks,
Alaerte
Hi
Have you used it in production networks?
I am wondering how it scale with the values you are using (50 and 3 for
minimum interval and multiplier)
tks,
Alaerte
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:24:59 +0100
From: Gard Undheim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BFD over RSVP LSPs
Hi,
Last time I checked it, both Juniper and Cisco has false positive for very
aggressive values (in production networks, where there are several other
process competing in CPU usage and flap in some links).
I am wondering if enabling it on PFE, the possibility of getting recovery
timer from 100
-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-01.
We are already running P2MP LSP (template-based) for VPLS multicast
delivery. We're on 8.3.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of alaerte vidali
Sent: Friday, 30 November, 2007 2:14 PM
To: juniper-nsp
Hi,
Any news about what draft Juniper is considering implement to avoid waste
bandwidth when sending multicast over VPLS in ring topology?
tks,
Alaerte
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
HI,
Are you aware of any limitation about using TE with dynamic path over
etherchannel links?
tks.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Hi,
Need to test Multicast on MPLS VPN using logical router. Are you aware of
limitations?
We received note saying that is it not supported on logical routers.
thanks
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Have you used BFD for detecting failure on LSP?
If so, do you get false positives?
tks,
Alaerte
part of feature text in Juniper page:
===
You can configure Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) on MPLS
IPv4 LSPs as outlined in the
22 matches
Mail list logo