On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 10:26:10 AM Kurt Bales wrote:
To be fair, you find a Cisco product in the same price
range with the same features that can come even close to
that throughput!
7201 comes close price-wise (J6350), and I've done 950Mbps
on them, with QoS and very basic/short
Agreed, tho I was specifically refering to the list price of the SRX220
that the previous poster had referenced.
K.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 19:38, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net wrote:
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 10:26:10 AM Kurt Bales wrote:
To be fair, you find a Cisco product in
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 04:41:12 PM Kurt Bales wrote:
Agreed, tho I was specifically refering to the list price
of the SRX220 that the previous poster had referenced.
Ah okay - well, if you're sticking to the vendors'
portfolio, then Cisco's ASA firewalls are a better fit.
The smaller
Hello All -
We have a client with a lot of J-Series routers running 9.3 code or earlier.
We really like the features and functionality of JUNOS as a router and are more
than a little annoyed that Juniper seems to be forcing us to turn these routers
into firewalls.
What are others doing to
Ben,
Nobody is forcing the jseries to become firewalls. They did alter the
default behavior of the packet handling to be flow mode..but you can
configure that.
To enable packet mode junos. Just issue the following commands.
delete security
set security forwarding-options family mpls mode
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 6:18 AM, R. Benjamin Kessler
ben.kess...@zenetra.com wrote:
Hello All -
We have a client with a lot of J-Series routers running 9.3 code or earlier.
We really like the features and functionality of JUNOS as a router and are
more than a little annoyed that Juniper
On 11/07/2011 02:18 PM, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote:
Hello All -
We have a client with a lot of J-Series routers running 9.3 code or
earlier. We really like the features and functionality of JUNOS as a
router and are more than a little annoyed that Juniper seems to be
forcing us to turn these
Hey,
I'd say get a bigger CF and install some 10.4 version and follow this;
http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Enabling_packet_based_forwarding
Disables all that flow stuff you really don't want on a router.
--
Timh Bergström
System Operations
Videoplaza
timh.bergst...@videoplaza.com
+46 727
That would be cool if it didn't also break IPSec VPNs...bummer
-Original Message-
From: Timh Bergström [mailto:timh.bergst...@videoplaza.com]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 4:28 PM
To: R. Benjamin Kessler
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J-Series Router Options
Hey
On 07/11/11 06:18, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote:
Hello All -
We have a client with a lot of J-Series routers running 9.3 code or earlier.
We really like the features and functionality of JUNOS as a router and are
more than a little annoyed that Juniper seems to be forcing us to turn these
On 7 November 2011 14:10, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
What are others doing to deal with the flow issues associated with
more recent versions of code?
We simply upgraded the RAM and forced packet mode.
Interestingly, we're toying with the idea of using the little SRX2xx series
To be fair, you find a Cisco product in the same price range with the same
features that can come even close to that throughput!
K.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:00, David Ball davidtb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 November 2011 14:10, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
What are others doing
12 matches
Mail list logo
