2012/4/4 Jeff Wheeler j...@inconcepts.biz:
I just got an MX80 that won't boot 10.4 software. Like you, I did not
want to upgrade to newer software yet, as my existing MX80s are all
running 10.4R4.5 and we are satisfied with it.
FYI my Midplane is REV 09, PEMs REV 04, QXM REV 06. All part
2012/3/22 Timh Bergström timh.bergst...@videoplaza.com:
I recently bought a MX5-T (Instead of the MX80-5G) and I'm running
10.4R8.5 on my other MX80s and would naturally like to run the same
codebase on all my MX-series hardware. However when I try to install
the 10.4R8.5 release on the MX5-T
Wow, that sucks major meatballs, thanks for the clarification.
So there might be an option to hack that into the supported list of
hardware so the damn code will boot at least. I'll look at it if I
have the time. :-)
Or if we all yell high enough they might release 10.4S to support the
The _only_ issue is that the chassis ident is MX5-T/40-T etc...
The ID is not in the list so JunOS refuses to finish booting.
We had some part numbers swapped, asked for MX80-40 in late December and
received MX40-T, just had 7 of them swapped out. (We are currently
running 10.4, no way in
Perhaps, I wish it was still allowed to run earlier code, they've had
honor-based restrictions before and I just think that it should
continue like that. Locking down stuff will only make people find
keygens/license generators and do it anyway if they don't honor the
restrictions in the first
On Thursday 22 March 2012 13:00:57 Timh Bergström wrote:
I'm going to try to install 11.2R5.4 (recommended release) on it now,
I do not trust a R1-release. Ever. ;-)
FYI, I've just noticed 11.4R2.14 appeared yesterday (22nd).
Only been 4 months since the R1 release...
Typically I downloaded
Hi,
I recently bought a MX5-T (Instead of the MX80-5G) and I'm running
10.4R8.5 on my other MX80s and would naturally like to run the same
codebase on all my MX-series hardware. However when I try to install
the 10.4R8.5 release on the MX5-T it says that the platform is not
supported, I thought
Hi,
Here:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos11.2/information-products/topic-collections/release-notes/11.2/topic-57399.html
New MX5, MX10, and MX40 3D Universal Edge Routers—Three new routers
based on the modular MX80 chassis are available in Junos OS Release 11.2R6.
Though in
Hi,
Thanks for the information, it gives some answers. But what would
actually happen if I try to install 10.4R8.5 with no-validate etc and
force it to accept it, would it stop working or not, since it's the
same hardware as the MX80 but with other descriptions it should
work, but I'm unsure.
I suppose it will not work.
Also look at:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/general/mx80-features.html
On 22.03.2012 12:20, Timh Bergström wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the information, it gives some answers. But what would
actually happen if I try to
11.2R4.3 worked with our MX5/MX40s, although we upgraded to 11.2R6.3
because of a mib2d memory leak in 11.2R4.3. Other than that, it worked
pretty OK at least with trivial config.
AR
On 03/22/2012 10:13 AM, Tima Maryin wrote:
Hi,
Here:
: [j-nsp] JunOS 10.4R8.5 on MX5? Am I forced to run 11.4+?
11.2R4.3 worked with our MX5/MX40s, although we upgraded to 11.2R6.3 because of
a mib2d memory leak in 11.2R4.3. Other than that, it worked pretty OK at least
with trivial config.
AR
On 03/22/2012 10:13 AM, Tima Maryin wrote:
Hi,
Here
and I was
onsite...
Paul
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Timh Bergström
Sent: March-22-12 4:21 AM
To: Tima Maryin
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JunOS 10.4R8.5 on MX5? Am I forced
I suspect the 10.4 would not lock down the XE ports on the chassis, so there is
a reason for not allowing it to work...
It's quite weird, especially since I can upgrade the system to a full MX80
with licences only, and if I do that I expect that I will be able to run my
standard release
I think it's a matter of the newer switching fabric only being supported in 11.
Will O'Brien
On Mar 22, 2012, at 8:12 AM, Per Granath per.gran...@gcc.com.cy wrote:
I suspect the 10.4 would not lock down the XE ports on the chassis, so there
is a reason for not allowing it to work...
I believe you have one of the fixed configuration boxes which are different
than the fully modular boxes, those do have additional capabilities such as
h-qos
Would suspect diferent minimum codes based on that
On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:16 AM, Timh Bergström wrote:
Hi,
I recently bought a MX5-T
16 matches
Mail list logo
