is some newer enterprise stuff that can help freshen the
> old mare a bit I suppose. ;)
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Tajer [mailto:adam.ta...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 1:41 PM
> To: Harry Reynolds; juniper-nsp
> Subj
No, but there is some newer enterprise stuff that can help freshen the
old mare a bit I suppose. ;)
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Tajer [mailto:adam.ta...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 1:41 PM
To: Harry Reynolds; juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes
gt; Regards
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Van Tol [mailto:e...@atlantech.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 12:03 PM
> To: Harry Reynolds; juniper-nsp
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Harry Re
] Missing BGP Routes
> -Original Message-
> From: Harry Reynolds [mailto:ha...@juniper.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 1:46 PM
> To: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes
>
> Normally an as path loop or other sanity check results in t
Try a keep-all (
https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos93/swconfig-routing/keep.html)
as suggested by Harry and the routes should show up as hidden, then
you
can investigate the cluster-id and/or originator-id to see if there is
problem there. If originator-id matches the bgp router-
> -Original Message-
> From: Harry Reynolds [mailto:ha...@juniper.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 1:46 PM
> To: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes
>
> Normally an as path loop or other sanity check results in this state.
> Fr
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:16 -0400, Eric Van Tol wrote:
> Yes, my bad. The configs are exactly the same as it relates to the ibgp
> group, so I copied the original one and just replaced IPs. I assure you they
> are the same!
Okay, the paste you sent does not include the edge01 / edge02 BGP group
> -Original Message-
> From: Harry Reynolds [mailto:ha...@juniper.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 1:46 PM
> To: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes
>
> Normally an as path loop or other sanity check results in this state.
> Fr
r.net] On Behalf Of Jeff S Wheeler
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 2:01 PM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes
>
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:46 -0700, Harry Reynolds wrote:
> > Normally an as path loop or other sanity check results in thi
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:46 -0700, Harry Reynolds wrote:
> Normally an as path loop or other sanity check results in this state.
> >>From the config below does not seem this is the case. Perhaps add
> keep-all, restart/soft clear session, and then display hidden. Perhaps
> something will jump out.
nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:14 AM
To: juniper-nsp
Subject: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes
Hi all,
In what instance would a router be missing routes that are advertised to
it? And by missing, I don't mean 'inactive' or
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:23 -0400, Eric Van Tol wrote:
> > Is the next-hop reachable?
>
> Yes, it is. Even if it wasn't, wouldn't the routes be listed in the 'hidden'
> output?
I think the routes should be "hidden" for every case where they are
rejected by policy, and if the next-hop can't be re
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny McPherson [mailto:da...@tcb.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 1:23 PM
> To: Eric Van Tol
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes
>
>
> Can you send the BGP configs from the client, the
> RR, and the non-receiving route
> -Original Message-
> From: Varaillon Jean Christophe [mailto:j.varail...@cosmoline.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 1:20 PM
> To: Eric Van Tol; 'juniper-nsp'
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes
>
> Is the next-hop reachable?
Yes, it is. Even if
Is the next-hop reachable?
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 7:14 PM
To: juniper-nsp
Subject: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes
Hi all,
In what instance would a
Hi all,
In what instance would a router be missing routes that are advertised to it?
And by missing, I don't mean 'inactive' or 'hidden'. I have four routers
peering through a full-mesh IBGP, one of which is advertising several routes
that were received from a route reflector client. The rout
16 matches
Mail list logo
