Re: [j-nsp] QFX5110 / VXLAN

2018-08-07 Thread Richard McGovern
They are both planned to support L3, but probably not day 1. QFX5200/QFX5210, both shipping products, are L2 only today. L3 VXLAN support will probably require RIOT – recycle packet. These platforms are Broadcom based so limitation is a Broadcom limitation. Hope this helps. On 8/7/18, 1:50

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5110 / VXLAN

2018-08-07 Thread Brian Rak
Are the QFX5200/QFX5210 also only layer 2 EVPN-VXLAN? On 8/7/2018 1:42 PM, Richard McGovern wrote: Correct. For this functionality one needs either a 10K/MXPTX or EX9200 at current time. These situations may also require EVPN-MPLS, versus EVPN-VXLAN. QFX5110 is limited to EVPN-VXLAN at

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5110 / VXLAN

2018-08-07 Thread Richard McGovern
Correct. For this functionality one needs either a 10K/MXPTX or EX9200 at current time. These situations may also require EVPN-MPLS, versus EVPN-VXLAN. QFX5110 is limited to EVPN-VXLAN at least today. QFX5100 provide L2 only EVPN-VXLAN. Thanks for pointing this out. On 8/6/18, 12:40 PM,

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5110 / VXLAN

2018-08-06 Thread Mike Gonnason
Be aware on the QFX5110 that L3 VXLAN is limited, You cannot route vxlan to vlan: https://prsearch.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=prcontent=PR1318178 On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:51 PM Brant Ian Stevens < bra...@argentiumsolutions.com> wrote: > And now there's the announcement of the QFX5120

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5110 / VXLAN

2018-07-04 Thread Scott Harvanek
Cost is a factor I don’t think I can get anyone to bite on something bigger either as the application is solely VXLAN in a compact form factor. -Scott H > On Jul 4, 2018, at 2:20 PM, Pavel Lunin wrote: > > Btw, it's a very good question if anyone here has more or less close to > real-world

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5110 / VXLAN

2018-07-04 Thread Pavel Lunin
Btw, it's a very good question if anyone here has more or less close to real-world experience with L3 gw and evpn type 5 routes on QFX5110 or maybe any other trident 2+ based box. Would much appreciate your input. Regards, Pavel July 3, 2018, 18:48 Roger Wiklund : > Hi Scott > > Should be fine

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5110 / VXLAN

2018-07-03 Thread Roger Wiklund
Hi Scott Should be fine as L2 GW. L3 GW and Route Type 5 support is quite recent. Beefier alternatives are QFX10002, or MX204 if you want to go MX route with fewer ports. Both have custom ASICs with higher scale, and higher chance to overcome caveats/limitations especially tied to chipset

[j-nsp] QFX5110 / VXLAN

2018-07-03 Thread Scott Harvanek
Is anyone on here running 5110s for VXLAN/VTEP/EVPN and run into any issues? I’ve gone over the caveats list Juniper has for these in regards to what they won’t do in regards to VXLAN and it seems like they meet our needs… just curious if anyone has run into any lesser documented issues with