To: Peder Bach
Cc: Juniper-Nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Tunnel services on the DPCE-R-20GE-2XGE
* Peder Bach
> Yes, we run the 20 x GE with tunnel.
>
> FPC 0REV 14 DPCE 20x 1GE R EQ
I'm not sure if that's the same card, the DPCE-R-20GE-2XGE has 2x 10GbE
in
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 12:31:38PM +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> > fpc 0 {
> > pic 1 {
> > tunnel-services {
> > bandwidth 1g;
> >
> > Interface will be: ip-0/1/10
>
> Interesting. So you're still able to use all physical ports (ge-0/1/0
> through ge-0/1/9) as before; yo
* Mertens, Bart (NSN - BE/Herentals)
> You are not oversubscribing that 'pic'. There is a bandwith of 14ge per
> 'pic' (per 10x1ge port, or per 1x10ge port).
I see, thanks for clearing that up for me.
> When you then create a tunnel interface on a pic with 10x1ge port, you
> still have more then
On 1/4/10 12:31 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
Interesting. So you're still able to use all physical ports (ge-0/1/0
through ge-0/1/9) as before; you've actually oversubscribed the PFE by
11:10?
Correct .. the PFE has a capability of a bit more than 11G .. hence the
1G tunnel can be configure
> > Yes, we run the 20 x GE with tunnel.
> >
> > FPC 0REV 14 DPCE 20x 1GE R EQ
>
> I'm not sure if that's the same card, the DPCE-R-20GE-2XGE has 2x 10GbE
> in addition to 20 x GbE. I think you might have the DPCE-R-Q-20GE-SFP?
It's not the same card. But the *principl
* Peder Bach
> Yes, we run the 20 x GE with tunnel.
>
> FPC 0REV 14 DPCE 20x 1GE R EQ
I'm not sure if that's the same card, the DPCE-R-20GE-2XGE has 2x 10GbE
in addition to 20 x GbE. I think you might have the DPCE-R-Q-20GE-SFP?
But in any case I think they're likely
Yes, we run the 20 x GE with tunnel.
FPC 0REV 14 DPCE 20x 1GE R EQ
fpc 0 {
pic 1 {
tunnel-services {
bandwidth 1g;
Interface will be: ip-0/1/10
-Peder
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Tore Anderson
wrote:
> Hi and a happy new year to you al
Hi and a happy new year to you all,
Does anyone know if the 1 Gb ports on the DPCE-R-20GE-2XGE can be
(individually) configured with tunnel services?
I currently have only the DPCE-R-4XGE-XFP in use, and in order to use
tunnel services I need to set aside a whole 10 Gb port - which is way
more th
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:59:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - *May* use an explicit tunnel PIC in one of the 4 PIC slots (but since
> there is always a built-in tunnel PIC, why would you want to?).
If I remember correctly, the onboard "Tunnel PIC" gives you only
~150mbps throughput. I may
> I think Erdem is right in that the ASM is optional in the M7i chassis.
> I'm not sure that many customers took the option of the M7i without
> the ASM, but the option was definitely there. The absence of the ASM
> does not automatically mean that a discreet Tunnel PIC *will* be
> installed, al
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erdem Sener
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 7:21 AM
To: Dermot Williams
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Tunnel Services
Hello,
IIRC, there are two bundles of M7i: either on-board Gigethernet OR ASM
(services module).
So, it doesn't necessarily
OTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erdem Sener
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 7:21 AM
> To: Dermot Williams
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Tunnel Services
>
> Hello,
>
> IIRC, there are two bundles of M7i: either on-board Gigethern
008 12:03
> To: 'Eric Van Tol'; Dermot Williams; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Tunnel Services
>
> Well... Ok. So "The tunnel pic (or built in one) serves that
> function
> as
> well." should be followed up with:
>
> Perform a &qu
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erdem Sener
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 7:21 AM
To: Dermot Williams
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Tunnel Services
Hello,
IIRC, there are two bundles of M7i: either on-board Gigethern
quot;ASP - Integrated" in place of the
Tunnel PIC. It doesn't appear that one is a pre-requisite for the other.
Regards,
Dermot
-Original Message-
From: Erdem Sener [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 July 2008 12:21
To: Dermot Williams
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-ns
nd make sure you have one! :) M5,
> M10,
> M20, etc. don't automatically have one either!
>
> Scott
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Van Tol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 6:57 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Dermot W
]
Sent: 15 July 2008 12:03
To: 'Eric Van Tol'; Dermot Williams; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Tunnel Services
Well... Ok. So "The tunnel pic (or built in one) serves that function
as
well." should be followed up with:
Perform a "show chassis hardware&qu
e-
From: Eric Van Tol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 6:57 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Dermot Williams'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Tunnel Services
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp-
&
ehalf Of Dermot Williams
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 6:24 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Tunnel Services
Hi List,
This might seem like a stupid question but the Juniper docs are fairly vague
on this - is the built-in tunnel PIC in the M7i/M10i RE all that is required
to termina
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Morris
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 6:52 AM
> To: 'Dermot Williams'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Tunnel Services
>
> An AS-P
Hi List,
This might seem like a stupid question but the Juniper docs are fairly
vague on this - is the built-in tunnel PIC in the M7i/M10i RE all that
is required to terminate GRE/IP-in-IP tunnels? Or does one also require
an AS PIC?
Thanks,
Dermot
_
21 matches
Mail list logo
