[kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Jonathan Riddell
A while ago Albert gave a talk at Akademy about collecting some data on our users. This got me thinking and with Neon I wanted to see how many installs we had. Our package install software will check for new versions being available and I could count the IPs of this check but that's very unreliab

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 14 April 2016 at 15:16, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > A while ago Albert gave a talk at Akademy about collecting some data > on our users. This got me thinking and with Neon I wanted to see how > many installs we had. Our package install software will check for new > versions being available and

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Mirko Boehm - KDE
Hi! > On 14 Apr 2016, at 15:16, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > A while ago Albert gave a talk at Akademy about collecting some data > on our users. This got me thinking and with Neon I wanted to see how > many installs we had. Our package install software will check for new > versions being avail

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 15:26:10 CEST Mirko Boehm - KDE wrote: > Hi! > > > On 14 Apr 2016, at 15:16, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > > A while ago Albert gave a talk at Akademy about collecting some data > > on our users. This got me thinking and with Neon I wanted to see how > > many insta

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:16:03 PM CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > A while ago Albert gave a talk at Akademy about collecting some data > on our users. This got me thinking and with Neon I wanted to see how > many installs we had. Our package install software will check for new > versions bein

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Any potentially privacy-sensitive information transfer should be opt-in, not > opt-out. > I'd assume that the vast majority of users will allow it (given that it's not > personally identifiable and they trust their distro), but op

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 14:36:21 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > Any potentially privacy-sensitive information transfer should be opt-in, > > not opt-out. > > I'd assume that the vast majority of users will allow it (given th

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 14 April 2016 at 17:30, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 14:36:21 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > > Any potentially privacy-sensitive information transfer should be > opt-in, > > > not opt-out. > > > I'

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Thursday, 2016-04-14, 14:36:21, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > Any potentially privacy-sensitive information transfer should be opt-in, > > not opt-out. > > I'd assume that the vast majority of users will allow it (given that it's >

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 14 April 2016 at 19:04, Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Thursday, 2016-04-14, 14:36:21, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > > Any potentially privacy-sensitive information transfer should be > opt-in, > > > not opt-out. > > > I'd assume th

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Thursday 14 April 2016 16:18:30 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 15:26:10 CEST Mirko Boehm - KDE wrote: > > > On 14 Apr 2016, at 15:16, Jonathan Riddell > > > wrote: > > > relative metric of numbers of installs not absolute numbers. So > > > I added a machine-id to the UR

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 14 de abril de 2016 14:16:03 PDT Jonathan Riddell wrote: > But KDE cares about privacy and it's in our Vision and I don't want to > be accused of violating that. But currently I can't see how this can > violate users privacy any more than an IP address can so I'm curious > to hear

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-15 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, April 14, 2016 05:49:18 PM Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > One idea: KDE's tradition is integration of experience; how about a single > "Do not track" setting for apps (not just for the Plasma) like it's the > case for browsers? I'd prefer a much simpler and easier to understand thing: "Pl

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-15 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Friday, April 15, 2016 12:39:08 AM Ingo Klöcker wrote: > IMO it must be opt-in. One of my main reason for using Free Software is > my (probably naïve) hope that Free Software does not phone home at all. > At least not, unless I have explicitly allowed it to do so. I fully agree with this. If

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-15 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 15 April 2016 at 14:01, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Thursday, April 14, 2016 05:49:18 PM Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > One idea: KDE's tradition is integration of experience; how about a > single > > "Do not track" setting for apps (not just for the Plasma) like it's the > > case for browsers?

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-15 Thread Albert Vaca
What's the problem with pinging the Neon servers? Any system already does way more than that when checking for updates, not to mention when you connect to a website, or even IRC. How can this ping be violating any privacy if we don't even need to store the IP, just a unique ID? We can even generat

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-15 Thread David Edmundson
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > A while ago Albert gave a talk at Akademy about collecting some data > on our users. This got me thinking and with Neon I wanted to see how > many installs we had. Our package install software will check for new > versions being availab

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-15 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Freitag, 15. April 2016 17:46:45 CEST Albert Vaca wrote: > What's the problem with pinging the Neon servers? Any system already does > way more than that when checking for updates, not to mention when you > connect to a website, or even IRC. > > How can this ping be violating any privacy if we

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-15 Thread Frederik Schwarzer
Am 16.04.2016 01:46 schrieb Albert Vaca: What's the problem with pinging the Neon servers? Any system already does way more than that when checking for updates, not to mention when you connect to a website, or even IRC. How can this ping be violating any privacy if we don't even need to stor

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-15 Thread Clemens Toennies
On Apr 16, 2016 7:31 AM, "Frederik Schwarzer" wrote: > > > > Anyway, if wee feel the need to do it, I would vote for an opt-in solution shown in the first install wizard. +1 Greetings, Clemens. ___ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org http

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-16 Thread Loïc Grobol
Wether or not it would actually be harmful for user privacy, and whatever the implementation, it would be better for PR/brand image of this was strictly opt-in. We can take a cue from vlc and Mozilla telemetry fit how. Essentially, the time benefit of not having to ask permission is, I feel, far o

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-18 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dissabte, 16 d’abril de 2016, a les 3:05:38 CEST, Thomas Pfeiffer va escriure: > On Freitag, 15. April 2016 17:46:45 CEST Albert Vaca wrote: > > What's the problem with pinging the Neon servers? Any system already does > > way more than that when checking for updates, not to mention when you >

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-18 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dijous, 14 d’abril de 2016, a les 14:16:03 CEST, Jonathan Riddell va escriure: > A while ago Albert gave a talk at Akademy about collecting some data > on our users. Since i've been invoked: slides: https://conf.kde.org/system/attachments/45/original/spyware.pdf?1410020392 video: https://marc

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-19 Thread Martin Konold
Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016, 00:32:16 CEST schrieb Albert Astals Cid: Hi, > +1 Firefox does it well (imho) and i have not seen any backslash about it, > so kudos to its researchers that came up with it. FYI: I am really annoyed by FF spying on me through different means not only the official m

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-20 Thread Agustin Benito (toscalix)
Hi, (long mail) I went through this same discussions a few years ago in openSUSE. Let me outline my personal experience/point of view through that experience. At some point, openSUSE was in crossroad and those involved in taking action, including myself, were not able to agree on the diagnosis o

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-20 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Mittwoch, 20. April 2016 15:49:12 CEST Agustin Benito (toscalix) wrote: > Hi, > > (long mail) > > I went through this same discussions a few years ago in openSUSE. Let > me outline my personal experience/point of view through that > experience. > > At some point, openSUSE was in crossroad and

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-21 Thread Mirko Boehm - KDE
Hi, > On 21 Apr 2016, at 00:49, Agustin Benito (toscalix) wrote: > > So my suggestion is: > > * Let's do our best to be transparent about our goals, process and output, > > * Let;s provide a simple way for those who think that collective > ignorance is an affordable side effect of privacy to

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-21 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
Very good, Agustin. This shows everyone a wider picture. I think it's important to name things in a way that feels like a positive thing or at most neutral. So 'user feedback' not 'tracking', etc. And I would disagree with accusations by those that use 'tracking' terms. In this context if the vi