Re: Test your applications on Wayland

On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 2:14:45 PM CEST Martin Graesslin wrote: > Hello KDE application developers, > > with Plasma 5.8 we have reached a quite solid state in the Wayland porting > efforts. A state where you can start to test whether your application works > correctly on Wa

Re: QtWebEngine on Wayland (was: Re: Test your applications on Wayland)

On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 2:05:25 PM CEST Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > one major issue is that QtWebEngine does not work on Wayland at this time, > at least not if it is built with desktop OpenGL. See: > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-55384 > > This affects kdepim applications (at

Re: Test your applications on Wayland

On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:23:06 PM CEST Luca Beltrame wrote: > Il giorno Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:14:45 +0200 > > Martin Graesslin <mgraess...@kde.org> ha scritto: > > Such isos have the latest code and also hand-picked patches for > > QtWayland. > > Can we

Test your applications on Wayland

and also hand-picked patches for QtWayland. Thank you for helping our great Wayland endeavour. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to ask! Cheers Martin Graesslin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: KDE file dialog

On Sunday, March 6, 2016 1:48:13 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote: > Martin Graesslin wrote: > > No, because everything in the current plugin is Plasma specific. If we > > want to change the font, we will do so! > > Forcing a default font as you have done is a ba

Re: KDE file dialog

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:09:17 PM CET Sven Brauch wrote: > On 03/02/2016 11:56 AM, Thomas Lübking wrote: > > Imo that's a more issue: IPC is I/O, ie. unreliable. You cannot provide > > functionality that relies on working IPC, but hard-relying on it is bad > > design (nb. that the failing

Re: KDE file dialog

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 11:46:01 AM CET Sven Brauch wrote: > Hey, > > On 03/02/2016 11:19 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > No, because everything in the current plugin is Plasma specific. > > Meh. In some kind of theoretical view you are right, I do see that. > Pr

Re: KDE file dialog

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 11:08:30 AM CET Mark Gaiser wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Martin Graesslin <mgraess...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Monday, February 29, 2016 9:42:11 PM CET Sven Brauch wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > On 02/28/2016 03:58 PM,

Re: KDE file dialog

On Monday, February 29, 2016 9:42:11 PM CET Sven Brauch wrote: > Hey, > > On 02/28/2016 03:58 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > > This is what I use: > > export QT_QPA_PLATFORMTHEME=kde > > > > and you need the integration plugin installed. It used to be part of > > Frameworks (frameworksintegration),

Re: KDE file dialog

On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 7:37:55 PM CET Mark Gaiser wrote: > Op 29 feb. 2016 11:10 p.m. schreef "Thiago Macieira" : > > On segunda-feira, 29 de fevereiro de 2016 21:42:11 PST Sven Brauch wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > On 02/28/2016 03:58 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > > This is

Re: polkit-qt-1 does not build

On Friday, February 26, 2016 10:37:10 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been hammering away at some of the builds on our Jenkins Sandbox, > and have found it isn't possible to get polkit-qt-1 to build. > > This blocks the entire KDE 4 chain, among other things. > > Could someone

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 2:09:01 AM CET Valorie Zimmerman wrote: > We *can* do this, we need to do this, and Ben doesn't have time to do > all the work himself. So we need to do our part to help. That's what I suggested in one of my mails. We need to tackle this as a coordinated project

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 9:51:50 AM CET Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 8:21:03 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Martin Graesslin <mgraess...@kde.org> wrote: > > > On Friday, December 4, 2015 11:28:03

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 10:54:13 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Martin Graesslin <mgraess...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 9:51:50 AM CET Martin Graesslin wrote: > >> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 8:21:03 P

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

On Friday, December 4, 2015 11:28:03 AM CET Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Friday, 4 December 2015 10:56:42 CET, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > Note that in the long run with DMARC looming you will need to switch > > to #2 anyway, and keeping your current behaviour will likely lead to > > mail from people who

Frameworks API documentation broken

Hi all, I just wanted to raise awareness of the fact that the Frameworks API documentation on api.kde.org is completely broken. Currently one only gets error 404 when clicking on the framework links and also in the search I cannot find e.g. the frameworks variant of KAboutData. Cheers Martin

Re: Problem investigating a heap-use-after-free in kwindowsystem

On Friday, October 2, 2015 8:38:20 PM CEST Michael Pyne wrote: > On Fri, October 2, 2015 23:59:00 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Friday 02 October 2015, a les 22:24:00, Martin Graesslin va escriure: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I added a new unit test to kw

Problem investigating a heap-use-after-free in kwindowsystem

Hi all, I added a new unit test to kwin today [1] and it failed on the CI system due to the enabled ASAN with an error in kwindowsystem. I'm able to reproduce it locally, but fail to understand it. To me the code and the test conditions looks correct. Relevant part of the bt: #0 0x7f5198ac2c84

Re: Adding further modules to api.kde.org

On Saturday, September 19, 2015 1:11:24 PM CEST Allen Winter wrote: > On Saturday, September 19, 2015 07:03:40 PM Martin Graesslin wrote: > > On Saturday, September 19, 2015 12:54:57 PM CEST you wrote: > > > http://api.kde.org/4.x-api/workspace-apidocs/kwayland/html/index.

Re: Adding further modules to api.kde.org

t's probably a bad idea). Cheers Martin > > Then at least the apidox will be generated. > > Step 2: I need to muck with the EBN scripts so the apidox are written > to someplace other than the default kde4 location. > > On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 09:23:08

Re: Adding further modules to api.kde.org

te: > > Am 2015-09-10 21:50, schrieb Allen Winter: > > > On Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:57:10 AM Martin Graesslin wrote: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> back in KDE4 days the workspace libraries were listed on api.kde.org > > &

Re: Adding further modules to api.kde.org

rstood the problem. > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Allen Winter <win...@kde.org> wrote: > > > On Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:57:10 AM Martin Graesslin wrote: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> back in KDE4 days the workspace libra

Adding further modules to api.kde.org

Hi all, back in KDE4 days the workspace libraries were listed on api.kde.org [1]. But for the current version we don't have any API docs available. The section "Other KDE Software" [2] lists KDE Support, KDE Extragear and Playground but apparently nothing from what used to be KDE SC. Does

Re: Modular startkde proof of concept

On Thursday, August 20, 2015 05:42:39 PM Thomas Lübking wrote: On Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 17:22:26 CEST, Sebastian Kügler wrote: That means that we need at least two ways to start a session. startkde.common.d startkde.wayland.d startkde.x11.d ls -1 | sort -t=/ -k2 profit!...?

Re: Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure

On Saturday 31 January 2015 20:37:31 Christoph Feck wrote: On Saturday 31 January 2015 20:07:42 Eike Hein wrote: [...] Qt is using gerrit and we intend to remain a major stakeholde in Qt development, which means a sizable number of KDE developers need to be familiar with gerrit anyway [...]

Re: Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure

On Thursday 29 January 2015 12:25:57 Jan Kundrát wrote: On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 13:14:14 CEST, Martin Gräßlin wrote: Navigation through the code is difficult, you cannot see the complete change in one, but have to go through each file. This is something I consider as unfortunate as

Re: About X11's WM_HINTS.UrgencyHint and KF5's NET::DemandsAttention

On Wednesday 03 September 2014 14:36:48 Paulo Lieuthier wrote: Hello everyone, I'm a LXQt contributor and I've been working on getting it rid of Xlib calls by using KF5's WindowSystem. It looks nice so far. The problem I'm having now is that I can't get the taskbar to indicate a window

Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

On Wednesday 07 May 2014 19:42:21 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dimecres, 7 de maig de 2014, a les 10:11:37, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: Hi all, I need some advice. The new GTK+ release For those that don't follow much the GTK+ world, which release number is that? 3.12.1 - minor version

Re: Lokalization for KDE AppStream AppData files

On Thursday 20 February 2014 18:54:32 Matthias Klumpp wrote: Hi! I am working on bringing AppData to KDE. AppData is a XML-based metadata format to enhance information displayed about applications in software-centers. It, for example, includes long descriptions of an application, homepage

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

On Monday 06 January 2014 07:52:50 Kevin Ottens wrote: The current list of modules is there: http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List As you can see there's quite some holes in the table, and quite a few entries marked unmaintained. KDE Frameworks as a set of technologies will only be

Re: KClasses vs. Qt5Classes

On Tuesday 31 December 2013 12:15:09 David Faure wrote: QSystemTrayIcon = KNotificationItem No clue. I can't even find KNotificationItem in KF5 anywhere !?!? In fact it doesn't exist in kdelibs4 either. I think it got replaced with KStatusNotifierItem since 4.4 ? That one is still

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

On Friday 27 December 2013 18:31:19 Ivan Čukić wrote: It just *needs* to be smooth and stable. It would be awful if the first impression of baloo was the same as with the first releases of plasma and nepomuk. Maybe the Nepomuk/Baloo developers could think about a fallback plan in case problems

Re: Regression of KItemWidgetDelegate in 4.12

On Wednesday 11 December 2013 19:59:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hi guys, seems that 4.12 is hit by a pretty bad regression in KItemWidgetDelegate (patches that don't seem to have been reviewed, but I won't fight that now) More info at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328528 It seems

Re: Adopting AppData in KDE?

On Saturday 02 November 2013 12:53:14 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: Okay... Couple of questions: * screenshot: which theme/color scheme should be used (btw, for Krita, on Gnome3, Plastique is hard-coded, because other themes are broken.) You want to sell your app to the user: use what makes it look

Re: Proposal for branching policy towards KF5

On Friday 19 July 2013 01:39:47 Michael Jansen wrote: On Friday, July 19, 2013 12:21:21 AM David Faure wrote: After more live discussion with Sebas and Marco plus Aaron over a video chat, we came up with the following setup for the workspace repos (*) : - the development branch for their

Re: Proposal for branching policy towards KF5

On Thursday 18 July 2013 10:26:06 Sebastian Kügler wrote: - master stays on 4.11, receives bugfixes, our releases are based on this branch and their version number will stay 4.11 how do we prevent that people commit features into master? I would prefer if we lock down master in gitolite so

Re: KDE/4.11 branched what to do with kde-workspace?

On Monday 15 July 2013 14:42:14 Sebastian Kügler wrote: Hey, On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 18:57:41 Albert Astals Cid wrote: So the kde-workspace dudes decided they don't want a 4.12 release and that they'll do a LTS 4.11, fine, how do we fix that branch wise? After carefully reading

Re: KDE/4.11 branched what to do with kde-workspace?

On Wednesday 10 July 2013 01:25:06 Andras Mantia wrote: On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:45:39 PM Martin Graesslin wrote: * master is opened for feature development and will lead to Plasma Workspaces 2 (or whatever the release will be called in the end). Does this mean that kde-workspace

Re: Releases in 3 months

On Wednesday 10 July 2013 17:13:11 Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2013-07-10, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote: =3D=3D On scheduling mainenance releases in a longer 4 month cycle, i=E2=80=99d cut that to 8 weeks and keep jus= t the one=20 update. this would ease the burdon on our

Re: KDE/4.11 branched what to do with kde-workspace?

On Tuesday 09 July 2013 18:57:41 Albert Astals Cid wrote: So the kde-workspace dudes decided they don't want a 4.12 release and that they'll do a LTS 4.11, fine, how do we fix that branch wise? I don't see how that affects branching. * 4.11 is branched from master * master is opened for feature

Re: Releases in 3 months

On Monday 08 July 2013 20:06:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dilluns, 8 de juliol de 2013, a les 14:03:19, Scott Kitterman va escriure: Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dilluns, 8 de juliol de 2013, a les 11:25:42, Scott Kitterman va escriure: On Monday, July 08, 2013

Re: Plasma Workspaces 4.11: the last feature release in the 4.xseries for kde-workspace

On Saturday 04 May 2013 22:34:04 Kevin Kofler wrote: On Friday 03 May 2013 at 17:04:44, Matthias Klumpp wrote: @Kevin: I am only remotely following this issue, but as PackageKit developer, I would of course like to see our project in Plasma Workspaces as soon as possible. But I don't know

Re: cxx11-cmake-modules in kdereview

On Saturday 02 March 2013 00:37:25 Ivan Čukić wrote: gcc -std=c++11 -fPIE -E -dM -I$QTDIR/include -include QtCore/qglobal.h -xc++ /dev/null | grep Q_COMPILER That will give you the full listing of detected features, matching exactly what will be available at compile-time. This does

Re: Login for bug reporting

On Sunday 10 February 2013 16:40:06 Jekyll Wu wrote: On 2013年02月07日 18:29, Martin Gräßlin wrote: Also spend a moment and look at the report. There is multiple times written that we don't want any further comments on the bug and that doesn't help anything. Still attachements, still

Re: Login for bug reporting

On Wednesday 06 February 2013 22:41:25 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: Hi all, On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Frank Reininghaus frank7...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 06.02.2013 18:57 schrieb Kevin Krammer: Hi folks, at FOSDEM I was approached by a person who asked me to relay his

Re: [GSoC] KWin colour management

On Sunday 18 March 2012 20:01:01 Casian Andrei wrote: Hello, taking it to the KWin mailinglist as that's the relevant list in case this proposal would be accepted. First of all thanks for considering doing a GSoC project around KWin. I need your guidance in order to create a decent proposal. I