See
http://build.kde.org/job/kwindowsystem_master_qt5/Variation=All,label=LINBUILDER/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Burkhard Lück lu...@hube-lueck.de wrote:
Hi,
I found a lot of docbook issues in many workspace repos, i. e. code but no
corresponding docbook in a repo and vice versa:
kde-cli-tools:
mv plasma-desktop/doc/kcontrol/filetypes/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117599/#review55972
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117599/
---
(Updated April 17, 2014, 4:27 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On April 12, 2014, 11:12 a.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
I wonder if this really belongs in kdecoreaddons. I.e. it is only relevant
for KDE applications porting, right?
IMHO this would fit best in an explicit porting framework
David Faure wrote:
I don't want to put this in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117617/
---
Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules and KDE Frameworks.
On April 12, 2014, 11:12 a.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
I wonder if this really belongs in kdecoreaddons. I.e. it is only relevant
for KDE applications porting, right?
IMHO this would fit best in an explicit porting framework
David Faure wrote:
I don't want to put this in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117619/
---
Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules and KDE Frameworks.
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 12:56:01 Elvis Angelaccio wrote:
So, the choice is between the branch test and test2. Let me know
what do you prefer.
For completeness the alternatives in details are:
- branch test: no splitters, with dividers (i.e. 4 QFrames in a
horizontal layout):
I represented KDE again this year at the freedesktop summit in Nuremberg.
Please find our report below.
From March 31 to April 4, Free Software desktop hackers from many of the
largest desktops (including GNOME, KDE, Unity and LXDE-Qt) met to
collaborate on specifications and tools to improve
El Dijous, 17 d'abril de 2014, a les 20:04:07, Ingo Klöcker va escriure:
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 12:56:01 Elvis Angelaccio wrote:
So, the choice is between the branch test and test2. Let me know
what do you prefer.
For completeness the alternatives in details are:
- branch test:
El Dijous, 17 d'abril de 2014, a les 20:17:38, David Faure va escriure:
I represented KDE again this year at the freedesktop summit in Nuremberg.
Please find our report below.
Awesome work as always David, let us know how we can help :)
Cheers,
Albert
From March 31 to April 4, Free
Hello Thomas and Luigi,
Sorry it has been such a while since you wrote. A lot of water has
flowed under the bridge since then, but this issue is still of the utmost
importance to MacPorts. See:
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/KDEProblems/KDETickets
On 21/03/2014, at 11:52 PM, Thomas Lübking
Ian Wadham ha scritto:
Hello Thomas and Luigi,
Sorry it has been such a while since you wrote. A lot of water has
flowed under the bridge since then, but this issue is still of the utmost
importance to MacPorts. See:
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/KDEProblems/KDETickets
On
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2014 20:32:17 CEST, Luigi Toscano wrote:
Ian Wadham ha scritto:
Sorry it has been such a while since you wrote. A lot of water has
flowed under the bridge since then, but this issue is still of the utmost
importance to MacPorts. See:
15 matches
Mail list logo
