> On Aug. 17, 2014, 6:57 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > Nice work. Just out of curiosity, is this something you need or is just a
> > simple bug to fix?
> >
> > Also, maybe we should be adding a unit test for this.
It is a bit of both. I was looking for a simple bugfix to get involved and this
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 09:38:29 AM Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Konqueror and rekonq use the same engine. So what one renders, so does the
> other.
rekonq is switching to the Chrome Blink engine in KF5
--
Lindsay
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
>> Visit http://mai
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118448/#review64691
---
To me it looks reasonable. I'll let the final decision to Vish
El Diumenge, 17 d'agost de 2014, a les 21:47:09, Christoph Feck va escriure:
> On Wednesday 04 June 2014 23:00:26 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Ok, so basically do:
> > * 4.14 as planned
> > * 4.15 but we don't call it 4.15 and we call it 14.12 and contains
> >
> > kdelibs4/qt4 and kf5 based appl
On Wednesday 04 June 2014 23:00:26 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Ok, so basically do:
> * 4.14 as planned
> * 4.15 but we don't call it 4.15 and we call it 14.12 and contains
> kdelibs4/qt4 and kf5 based applications
How do we manage which branches are used for the next application
releases?
Let'
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119789/#review64688
---
Nice work. Just out of curiosity, is this something you need o
On Sonntag, 17. August 2014 18:38:29 CEST, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Konqueror and rekonq use the same engine. So what one renders, so does the
other.
The may ship with different defaults for khtml or webkit as backend.
(Actually rekonq might even be linked to a newer version of QtWebkit in his
On Sunday 17 August 2014 12:56:41 Nowardev-Team wrote:
> rekonq : it's something that is in the middle it's lighter but it
> lacks of a lots of stuff and it doesn't render well pages , bank
> websites etc, so i don't use it .
> finally my love konqueror , LOL i like it even if it has problems ,
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118448/
---
(Updated Aug. 17, 2014, 11:34 a.m.)
Review request for Baloo, Localizatio
well , in my daily usage i have seen this :
firefox renders better webpages :
it's a standard for web browsing , this is an average opinion , i
mean there are website where firefox doesn't work well , instead
chromium and konqueror do.
chromium, is integrated better in kde , for example if you
10 matches
Mail list logo
