/119415/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119415/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
/filecustommetadata.cpp 664b13f
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119415/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
ink we need a new testcase in which
explicit writing a empty tag. I recommend a new testmethod.
- Felix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119415/#review62926
ot;user.xdg.tags" xatrr was always being set, even if
> > it did not have any value.
> > * What value should you be checking for now?
>
> Felix Eisele wrote:
> I'm not sure if i understand you. The test check only the old way and
> only the positiv way
/filecustommetadata.cpp 664b13f
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119415/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
ot;user.xdg.tags" xatrr was always being set, even if
> > it did not have any value.
> > * What value should you be checking for now?
>
> Felix Eisele wrote:
> I'm not sure if i understand you. The test check only the old way and
> only the positiv way
---
src/file/autotest/filemonitortest.cpp 19d8f85
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119450/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
hink about this idea to do in baloo?
Diffs
-
src/file/autotest/filemonitortest.cpp 19d8f85
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119450/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
Description
---
Added some Unittest for FileMonitor
Diffs
-
src/file/autotest/filemonitortest.h 9a72813
src/file/autotest/filemonitortest.cpp 19d8f85
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119459/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/m
/filemodifyjobtest.cpp ebfc9d9
src/file/lib/filecustommetadata.cpp 664b13f
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119415/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
viewboard.kde.org/r/119459/#review63120
---
On Juli 25, 2014, 10:41 vorm., Felix Eisele wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, v
Vishesh Handa.
Repository: baloo
Description
---
Added some Unittest for FileMonitor
Diffs (updated)
-
src/file/autotest/filemonitortest.h 9a72813
src/file/autotest/filemonitortest.cpp 19d8f85
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119459/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix
/keditcommentdialog.cpp PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119511/diff/
Testing
---
Tested in dolphin
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
/keditcommentdialog.h PRE-CREATION
src/keditcommentdialog.cpp PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119511/diff/
Testing
---
Tested in dolphin
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
itcommentdialog. If this way is ok, I will do this for the other dialogs.
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
> src/CMakeLists.txt 9b3a2d3
> src/kcommentwidget.cpp 00f69a9
> src/keditcommentdialog.h PRE-CREATION
> src/keditcommentdialog.cpp PRE-CREATION
>
> Di
On Juli 26, 2014, 1:58 nachm., Felix Eisele wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119459/
> --
src/keditcommentdialog.h PRE-CREATION
src/CMakeLists.txt 9b3a2d3
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119511/diff/
Testing
---
Tested in dolphin
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
PRE-CREATION
src/kcommentwidget.cpp 00f69a9
src/keditcommentdialog.h PRE-CREATION
src/CMakeLists.txt 9b3a2d3
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119511/diff/
Testing
---
Tested in dolphin
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel
/119459/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
5191b03
src/kedittagsdialog.cpp c83ce9d
src/kedittagsdialog_p.h 0bcf744
src/tagcheckbox.cpp af07a6c
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119543/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
-
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119543/#review63489
---
On Juli 30, 2014, 8:29 vorm., Felix Eisele wrote:
&g
045a185
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119543/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
but
> > there was a point when it split up.
> >
> > Also, if one really doesn't need it to be split up, then we should
> > probably use a QScopedPointer instead of deleting it outself.
>
> Felix Eisele wrote:
> i did googling yesterday and i
but
> > there was a point when it split up.
> >
> > Also, if one really doesn't need it to be split up, then we should
> > probably use a QScopedPointer instead of deleting it outself.
>
> Felix Eisele wrote:
> i did googling yesterday and i
but
> > there was a point when it split up.
> >
> > Also, if one really doesn't need it to be split up, then we should
> > probably use a QScopedPointer instead of deleting it outself.
>
> Felix Eisele wrote:
> i did googling yesterday and i
0bcf744
src/tagwidget.cpp f2c3601
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119543/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119543/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Felix Eisele
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
28 matches
Mail list logo