Re: How am i supposed to use arc? - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 26 de març de 2017, a les 20:26:25 CEST, A. Bikadorov va > escriure: >> On 26.03.2017 20:17, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > El diumenge, 26 de mar� de 2017, a les 18:41:00 CEST, A. Bikadorov va >> > >> >

Re: How am i supposed to use arc? - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On 26.03.2017 22:34, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 26 de març de 2017, a les 20:26:25 CEST, A. Bikadorov va > escriure: >> On 26.03.2017 20:17, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >>> El diumenge, 26 de mar� de 2017, a les 18:41:00 CEST, A. Bikadorov va >>> >>> escriure: On 26.03.2017

Re: How am i supposed to use arc? - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El diumenge, 26 de març de 2017, a les 20:26:25 CEST, A. Bikadorov va escriure: > On 26.03.2017 20:17, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El diumenge, 26 de mar� de 2017, a les 18:41:00 CEST, A. Bikadorov va > > > > escriure: > >> On 26.03.2017 18:36, Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > >>> Write it in a wiki

Re: How am i supposed to use arc? - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On 26.03.2017 20:17, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 26 de març de 2017, a les 18:41:00 CEST, A. Bikadorov va > escriure: >> On 26.03.2017 18:36, Boudhayan Gupta wrote: >>> Write it in a wiki page? >>> >>> Freundliche Grüße >>> Boudhayan Gupta >>> KDE e.V. - Sysadmin and Community Working

Re: How am i supposed to use arc? - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El diumenge, 26 de març de 2017, a les 18:41:00 CEST, A. Bikadorov va escriure: > On 26.03.2017 18:36, Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > > Write it in a wiki page? > > > > Freundliche Grüße > > Boudhayan Gupta > > KDE e.V. - Sysadmin and Community Working Groups > > +49 151 71032970 > > > > On 26 March

Re: How am i supposed to use arc? - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CEST, Ben Cooksley va > escriure: >> Hi everyone, >> >> We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories >> (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced

Re: How am i supposed to use arc? - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Il 26 marzo 2017 18:33:41 CEST, Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > >I tried using arc today, after reading some documentation it seems i >need to >use > arc diff >to upload a patch, but then i got hit by > > >$ arc diff >Usage Exception: This command requires arc to

Re: How am i supposed to use arc? - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On 26.03.2017 18:36, Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > Write it in a wiki page? > > Freundliche Grüße > Boudhayan Gupta > KDE e.V. - Sysadmin and Community Working Groups > +49 151 71032970 > > > On 26 March 2017 at 18:33, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a

Re: How am i supposed to use arc? - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Write it in a wiki page? Freundliche Grüße Boudhayan Gupta KDE e.V. - Sysadmin and Community Working Groups +49 151 71032970 On 26 March 2017 at 18:33, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CEST, Ben Cooksley va > escriure: >> Hi everyone, >>

How am i supposed to use arc? - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > Hi everyone, > > We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories > (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator. > Thanks go to Luigi Toscano for providing significant

Re: Finding contributor email is imposible - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Fredrik Höglund wrote: > On Monday 06 February 2017, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va >> escriure: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > From this point forward, communities should be moving

Re: Finding contributor email is imposible - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Michael Pyne wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:35:15PM +0100, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va >> escriure: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > From this point forward, communities should be

Re: Finding contributor email is imposible - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Monday 06 February 2017, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > > Hi everyone, > > > > From this point forward, communities should be moving away from > > Reviewboard to Phabricator for conducting code review. Sysadmin will >

Re: Finding contributor email is imposible - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:35:15PM +0100, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > > Hi everyone, > > > > From this point forward, communities should be moving away from > > Reviewboard to Phabricator for conducting code review.

Finding contributor email is imposible - was - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > Hi everyone, > > From this point forward, communities should be moving away from > Reviewboard to Phabricator for conducting code review. Sysadmin will > be announcing a timeline for the shutdown of Reviewboard in

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El dilluns, 6 de febrer de 2017, a les 10:19:30 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El dilluns, 6 de febrer de 2017, a les 8:18:04 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > >> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Albert Astals Cid

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dilluns, 6 de febrer de 2017, a les 8:18:04 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: >> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > El dissabte, 4 de febrer de 2017, a les 12:44:54 CET, Ben

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El dilluns, 6 de febrer de 2017, a les 8:18:04 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El dissabte, 4 de febrer de 2017, a les 12:44:54 CET, Ben Cooksley va > > > > escriure: > >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Albert Astals

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dissabte, 4 de febrer de 2017, a les 12:44:54 CET, Ben Cooksley va > escriure: >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > El divendres, 3 de febrer de 2017, a les 21:06:08 CET, Ben

Re: Differential commit log keyword is uncomfortable - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va >> escriure: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> We've just completed the registration of

Re: Differential commit log keyword is uncomfortable - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: >> Hi everyone, >> >> We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories >> (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones)

Re: Differential commit log keyword is uncomfortable - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

> Does anyone have love for the current syntax? I have a khotkeys macro for that... +1 for DIFFERENTIAL. It also seems that release scripts don't extract Phabricator links for inclusion in the changelog (it does that with REVIEW) Cheers, Kai Uwe

Differential commit log keyword is uncomfortable - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > Hi everyone, > > We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories > (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator. > Thanks go to Luigi Toscano for providing significant

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El dissabte, 4 de febrer de 2017, a les 12:44:54 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El divendres, 3 de febrer de 2017, a les 21:06:08 CET, Ben Cooksley va > > > > escriure: > >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Albert

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: >> This is not ok, the web interface for reviewboard was as good as rb-tools (I >> guess tbh i never used them) and "forcing" the use of a weird tool noone has >> heard of is not a good way to attract new

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

> This is not ok, the web interface for reviewboard was as good as rb-tools (I > guess tbh i never used them) and "forcing" the use of a weird tool noone has > heard of is not a good way to attract new contributors Agreed. Especially since arc is some mental php script that randomly amends

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El divendres, 3 de febrer de 2017, a les 21:06:08 CET, Ben Cooksley va > escriure: >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:37 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Thursday February 2 2017 21:50:38 Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > >>You missed the point. This "bit rot" is not about disk damage but >>about software incompatibility. ZFS doesn't help with that... > > You mean diffs that

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El divendres, 3 de febrer de 2017, a les 10:24:08 CET, Elvis Angelaccio va escriure: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >> El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET,

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El divendres, 3 de febrer de 2017, a les 21:06:08 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> We've just completed the

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

René J.V. Bertin ha scritto: > On Thursday February 2 2017 21:50:38 Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > >> You missed the point. This "bit rot" is not about disk damage but >> about software incompatibility. ZFS doesn't help with that... > > You mean diffs that no longer apply cleanly? In that case you

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Thursday February 2 2017 21:50:38 Nicolás Alvarez wrote: >You missed the point. This "bit rot" is not about disk damage but >about software incompatibility. ZFS doesn't help with that... You mean diffs that no longer apply cleanly? In that case you missed our point. Being able to consult

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va >> escriure: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> We've just completed the registration

Re: Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: >> Hi everyone, >> >> We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories >> (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

2017-02-02 7:23 GMT-03:00 René J.V. Bertin : > On Thursday February 2 2017 22:09:34 Ben Cooksley wrote: > >>For those who dismiss decay as an issue - problems with previous >>Reviewboard upgrades not taking cleanly have resulted in some reviews >>being damaged, causing their

Phabricator differential is not good - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > Hi everyone, > > We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories > (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator. > Thanks go to Luigi Toscano for providing significant

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Harald Sitter wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Luigi Toscano

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Harald Sitter wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Luigi Toscano >> wrote: >>> Il 02.02.2017 10:09 Ben Cooksley ha scritto: >>> Hi

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Luigi Toscano > wrote: >> Il 02.02.2017 10:09 Ben Cooksley ha scritto: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> As a starting point: keeping the software itself running is a >>>

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Could this be of any help? https://www.cloudpipes.com/integrations/phabricator/reviewboard A paying service, but if the integration allows migration of existing ReviewBoard stuff into Phabricator a well-timed 2-month trial (or multiple thereof ;)) might suffice? There's also this:

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Il 02.02.2017 10:09 Ben Cooksley ha scritto: > >> Hi all, >> >> As a starting point: keeping the software itself running is a >> non-starting option from my perspective. It's going to be shutdown. >> This is purely

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Il 02.02.2017 10:09 Ben Cooksley ha scritto: Hi all, As a starting point: keeping the software itself running is a non-starting option from my perspective. It's going to be shutdown. This is purely to reduce the amount of maintenance effort we have to expend in keeping our systems running.

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Hi all, As a starting point: keeping the software itself running is a non-starting option from my perspective. It's going to be shutdown. This is purely to reduce the amount of maintenance effort we have to expend in keeping our systems running. There is an enormous amount of software and other

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 07:45:15 +1300 Ben Cooksley wrote: [snip] > > I think that we need some cleanup on the old reviews (Albert Astal Cid > started > some time ago) and more important strongly tell new users (and old > users) to use Phabricator. I don't think that anyone wants

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

El dijous, 2 de febrer de 2017, a les 7:45:15 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > Anything older than that usually won't apply to the code anymore. You'd be surprised (yes i have a script that actually applies the MRs and lots of them even very old apply). Cheers, Albert

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Am 1. Februar 2017 20:34:52 MEZ schrieb Ben Cooksley : >On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Milian Wolff wrote: >> On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 7:56:52 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin > >>

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Milian Wolff wrote: > On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 7:56:52 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin > wrote: >> > On Sunday January 29 2017 08:32:21 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >>

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On 2/02/2017 12:41 AM, "Luigi Toscano" wrote: On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 10:31:44 CET Francis Herne wrote: > Sorry, forgot to reply-all and only sent to kdevelop-devel... > > - > > Hi, > > First off, there's a lot of postponed, or at least

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On 1/02/2017 10:38 PM, "René J.V. Bertin" wrote: On Wednesday February 1 2017 22:16:50 Ben Cooksley wrote: >We'd still have to keep the software running, and up to date (to avoid >it becoming a security risk). Running yes, but if log-in is disabled at the core and not

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 10:31:44 CET Francis Herne wrote: > Sorry, forgot to reply-all and only sent to kdevelop-devel... > > - > > Hi, > > First off, there's a lot of postponed, or at least possibly-useful, > work on ReviewBoard which would be lost. Some of this is from

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 11:52:01 CET Alexander Zhigalin wrote: > Completely agreeing with Rene, Luigi and Milian. > All this sounds very sad to me. > Phabricator is indeed very powerful and better for management stuff. > But Differential is not even merely comparable to RB by ease of use,

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Sorry, forgot to reply-all and only sent to kdevelop-devel... - Hi, First off, there's a lot of postponed, or at least possibly-useful, work on ReviewBoard which would be lost. Some of this is from newish contributors who might be discouraged - e.g. the author of

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 7:56:52 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > On Sunday January 29 2017 08:32:21 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > > > Hi, > > Hi Rene, > > > >From this point forward, communities should be moving

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Wednesday February 1 2017 22:16:50 Ben Cooksley wrote: >We'd still have to keep the software running, and up to date (to avoid >it becoming a security risk). Running yes, but if log-in is disabled at the core and not linked to the central LDAP service or whatever it is you use, what

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:26 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Wednesday February 1 2017 20:59:46 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > Hi > >> >>While I have yet to test it, Reviewboard does use quite a bit of AJAX >>and other dynamic resources - so I won't be surprised to find out that

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Wednesday February 1 2017 20:59:46 Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi > >While I have yet to test it, Reviewboard does use quite a bit of AJAX >and other dynamic resources - so I won't be surprised to find out that >the usual mechanisms for creating static copies of sites don't produce >a workable

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Ben Cooksley ha scritto: >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin >> wrote: >>> On Sunday January 29 2017 08:32:21 Ben Cooksley wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >> >> Hi Rene, >> >>> >>> >From

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Tuesday January 31 2017 20:10:42 Luigi Toscano wrote: >> It will be a complete shutdown of Reviewboard - we'll be archiving it >> in the event for some reason it becomes necessary to access the data >> it stores. > >Isn't it a way to change the site in static website and keep it alive?

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Ben Cooksley ha scritto: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin > wrote: >> On Sunday January 29 2017 08:32:21 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> Hi, > > Hi Rene, > >> >> >From this point forward, communities should be moving away from >>> Reviewboard to Phabricator

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Sunday January 29 2017 08:32:21 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > Hi, Hi Rene, > > >From this point forward, communities should be moving away from >>Reviewboard to Phabricator for conducting code review. Sysadmin will

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

On Sunday January 29 2017 08:32:21 Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi, >From this point forward, communities should be moving away from >Reviewboard to Phabricator for conducting code review. Sysadmin will >be announcing a timeline for the shutdown of Reviewboard in the near >future. I hope that shutdown

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Il 29 gennaio 2017 16:31:24 CET, Olivier Churlaud ha scritto: >Le dimanche 29 janvier 2017, 16:24:46 CET Luigi Toscano a écrit : >> Il 29 gennaio 2017 16:16:51 CET, Olivier Churlaud > ha >scritto: >> >Le dimanche 29 janvier 2017, 08:32:21 CET Ben

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Il 29 gennaio 2017 16:31:24 CET, Olivier Churlaud ha scritto: >Le dimanche 29 janvier 2017, 16:24:46 CET Luigi Toscano a écrit : >> Il 29 gennaio 2017 16:16:51 CET, Olivier Churlaud > ha >scritto: >> >Le dimanche 29 janvier 2017, 08:32:21 CET Ben

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Le dimanche 29 janvier 2017, 16:24:46 CET Luigi Toscano a écrit : > Il 29 gennaio 2017 16:16:51 CET, Olivier Churlaud ha scritto: > >Le dimanche 29 janvier 2017, 08:32:21 CET Ben Cooksley a écrit : > >> We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories > >>

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Il 29 gennaio 2017 16:16:51 CET, Olivier Churlaud ha scritto: >Le dimanche 29 janvier 2017, 08:32:21 CET Ben Cooksley a écrit : >> We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories >> (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator. >>

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Il 29 gennaio 2017 16:16:51 CET, Olivier Churlaud ha scritto: >Le dimanche 29 janvier 2017, 08:32:21 CET Ben Cooksley a écrit : >> We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories >> (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator. >>

Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Le dimanche 29 janvier 2017, 08:32:21 CET Ben Cooksley a écrit : > Hi everyone, Hi, > We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories > (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator. > Thanks go to Luigi Toscano for providing significant assistance with >

Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Hi everyone, We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator. Thanks go to Luigi Toscano for providing significant assistance with this process. >From this point forward, communities should be moving away from

Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Hi everyone, We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator. Thanks go to Luigi Toscano for providing significant assistance with this process. >From this point forward, communities should be moving away from

Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Hi everyone, We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator. Thanks go to Luigi Toscano for providing significant assistance with this process. >From this point forward, communities should be moving away from

Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

Hi everyone, We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator. Thanks go to Luigi Toscano for providing significant assistance with this process. >From this point forward, communities should be moving away from