On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:37:33PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:28:18PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:18:15AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 03:16:39PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Right, the question is how kernel
On 2013-04-13 20:24, Mohit Dhingra wrote:
Hi All,
I am Mohit Dhingra, planning to work in GSoC project Improve nested
virtualization support for x86. I got in touch with Jan
(jan.kis...@web.de) few days back.
As suggested by him, I am trying to write a simple unit test which
tests the
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:18:15AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 03:16:39PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Right, the question is how kernel can tell QEMU that the cpuid bit is
supported but should not be set unless explicitly asked by an user.
Actually, this seems to
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:46:42AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 17:16 +0800, Asias He wrote:
If we fail to submit the allocated tv_vmd to tcm_vhost_submission_work,
we will leak the tv_vmd. Free tv_vmd on fail path.
Signed-off-by: Asias He as...@redhat.com
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 04:10:50PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
Hi MST,
Ping on this series for use with vhost-scsi-pci code..?
They will need to be heading into target-pending/for-next soon to make
the v3.10 window opening in t-minus 9 days. ;)
--nab
Let me turns this around
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:21:34PM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
From: Yang Zhang yang.z.zh...@intel.com
Current interrupt coalescing logci which only used by RTC has conflict
with Posted Interrupt.
This patch introduces a new mechinism to use eoi to track interrupt:
When delivering an
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 12/04/2013 01:48:04 PM:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:44:14PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Ok, so then you prefer to add the inline functions to read/write to the
vmcs12
fields, (to set the request bit if shadowed field changed) and you are
not
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:29:14AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
This patch makes vhost_scsi_flush() wait for all the pending requests
issued before the flush operation to be finished.
Changes in v4:
- Introduce vhost_scsi_inflight
- Drop array to track flush
- Use RCU to protect vs_inflight
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:51:34PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 12/04/2013 01:48:04 PM:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:44:14PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Ok, so then you prefer to add the inline functions to read/write to the
vmcs12
fields, (to
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 05:23:41PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 04/12/2013 07:36 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com writes:
On 04/11/2013 12:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hello folks,
Here's the latest round of ARM fixes and updates for kvmtool. Most of
this is
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:41:58PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Rusty,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:36:00PM +0100, Rusty Russell wrote:
I'm confused. kvmtool is using too much memory, or the guest? If
kvmtool, the Device Initialization section above applies to the driver,
not the device.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:00:10PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:51:34PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 12/04/2013 01:48:04 PM:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:44:14PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Ok, so then you prefer to add
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:59:51PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:33:32PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:25:23PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 01:47:21PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:39:43PM
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The basic idea is to always transfer the pending event injection on
vmexit into the architectural state of the VCPU and then drop it from
there if it turns out that we left L2 to enter L1, i.e. if we enter
prepare_vmcs12.
vmcs12_save_pending_events takes
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
vmx_set_nmi_mask will soon be used by vmx_nmi_allowed. No functional
changes.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 20 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
Check if the interrupt or NMI window exit is for L1 by testing if it has
the corresponding controls enabled. This is required when we allow
direct injection from L0 to L2
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
If we are entering guest mode, we do not want L0 to interrupt this
vmentry with all its side effects on the vmcs. Therefore, injection
shall be disallowed during L1-L2 transitions, as in the previous
version. However, this check is conceptually independent
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
We only need to update vm_exit_intr_error_code if there is a valid exit
interruption information and it comes with a valid error code.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+),
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The logic for checking if interrupts can be injected has to be applied
also on NMIs. The difference is that if NMI interception is on these
events are consumed and blocked by the VM exit.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
Changes in this version:
- reworked patch 2, 4 and 5 according to review
- restored clearing of vm_entry_intr_info_field
- no longer read idt_vectoring_info_field from VMCS
- removed check of idt_vectoring_info_field on vmx_nmi_allowed/
vmx_interrupt_allowed
- added
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:25:09PM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
From: Yang Zhang yang.z.zh...@intel.com
The follwoing patches are adding the Posted Interrupt supporting to KVM:
The first patch enables the feature 'acknowledge interrupt on vmexit'.Since
it is required by Posted interrupt, we need
On 2013-04-14 12:07, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:00:10PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:51:34PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 12/04/2013 01:48:04 PM:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:44:14PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
On 2013-04-13 20:24, Mohit Dhingra wrote:
Hi All,
I am Mohit Dhingra, planning to work in GSoC project Improve nested
virtualization support for x86. I got in touch with Jan
(jan.kis...@web.de) few days back.
As suggested
Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote on 14/04/2013 01:27:10 PM:
On 2013-04-14 12:07, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:00:10PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:51:34PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 12/04/2013 01:48:04
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:27:10PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-04-14 12:07, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:00:10PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:51:34PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 12/04/2013 01:48:04 PM:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
As we may emulate the loading of EFER on VM-entry and VM-exit, implement
the checks that VMX performs on the guest and host values on vmlaunch/
vmresume. Factor out kvm_valid_efer for this purpose which checks for
set reserved bits.
Signed-off-by: Jan
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
If we load the complete EFER MSR on entry or exit, EFER.LMA (and LME)
loading is skipped. Their consistency is already checked now before
starting the transition.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |4 ++--
1 files
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 14/04/2013 01:34:52 PM:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:27:10PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-04-14 12:07, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:00:10PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:51:34PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:49:44PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 14/04/2013 01:34:52 PM:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:27:10PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-04-14 12:07, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:00:10PM +0300, Gleb Natapov
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:58:03PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:29:14AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
This patch makes vhost_scsi_flush() wait for all the pending requests
issued before the flush operation to be finished.
Changes in v4:
- Introduce
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:07:51PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:59:51PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:33:32PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:25:23PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 01:47:21PM
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:14:47PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
This adds a test case that jumps into VM86 by iret-ing to a TSS and back
to Protected Mode using a task gate in the IDT.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com
Applied, thanks. Found a bug with it and
If guest vcpu is in VM86 mode the vcpu state should be checked as if in
real mode.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index d268677..fec7c48 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -3554,7 +3554,7 @@ static bool
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 02:30:27PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 03/20/2013 03:06 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:58:56PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 03/17/2013 11:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:09:09PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Some
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 14/04/2013 02:16:02 PM:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:49:44PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 14/04/2013 01:34:52 PM:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:27:10PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-04-14 12:07, Gleb Natapov
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 04:47:48PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 14/04/2013 02:16:02 PM:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:49:44PM +0300, Abel Gordon wrote:
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote on 14/04/2013 01:34:52 PM:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:52:19AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
These patches add ability to measure speed of MMIO versus PIO, in
different configurations. As I didn't want to reserve a hardcoded range
of memory, I added pci bus scan support instead. Used together with the
new pci-testdev
On 04/14/2013 06:01 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 05:23:41PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 04/12/2013 07:36 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com writes:
On 04/11/2013 12:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hello folks,
Here's the latest round of ARM fixes
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:12:49PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The logic for checking if interrupts can be injected has to be applied
also on NMIs. The difference is that if NMI interception is on these
events are consumed and blocked by the VM exit.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:12:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Changes in this version:
- reworked patch 2, 4 and 5 according to review
- restored clearing of vm_entry_intr_info_field
- no longer read idt_vectoring_info_field from VMCS
- removed check of idt_vectoring_info_field on
On 2013-04-14 17:23, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:12:49PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The logic for checking if interrupts can be injected has to be applied
also on NMIs. The difference is that if NMI interception is on these
events are
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:16:46AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 04/14/2013 06:01 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 05:23:41PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 04/12/2013 07:36 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com writes:
On 04/11/2013 12:36 PM, Will
On 04/14/2013 11:53 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Initializing them only when they're actually needed will do the trick here.
Not initializing, adding the buffers. In the current spec, initialization
is always done before DRIVER_OK.
Yeah, that's better, but we're going to need a spec
On Tuesday, 09 April 2013 12:06:25 -0600,
Alex Williamson wrote:
I've a cluster (active/passive) with two KVM VM with Asterisk and
Pacemaker+Corosync. I wonder if anyone tried to use a OpenVox A400P
card from a virtual machine.
My idea is to have both nodes accessing this card. I don't
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 05:53:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-04-14 17:23, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:12:49PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The logic for checking if interrupts can be injected has to be applied
also on NMIs.
On 2013-04-14 18:18, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 05:53:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-04-14 17:23, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:12:49PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The logic for checking if interrupts can be
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 06:35:14PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-04-14 18:18, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 05:53:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-04-14 17:23, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:12:49PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:41:07AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Currently userspace assumes that that cpuid configuration returned by
KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID is the optimal one. What we want here is a way
for KVM to tell userspace that it can emulate movbe though it is not
optimal.
Ok, I don't
On Sunday, 14 April 2013 13:16:30 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
AFAIK, Athlon64 does not support AMD-Vi, which is the IOMMU support
you'd need.
I will investigate this issue and then tell you.
Well... I was looking if BIOS options of the motherboad (M2N32 SLI
Deluxe) had some reference to
First two patches are trivial bits. Rest rewrites x86-run in python,
which then makes it easy to parse unittests.cfg. This makes it
simpler to invoke individual unittests the same way autotest does.
Kevin has a similar series[1], but I'm reposting this for completeness.
[1]
---
.gitignore | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index ed857b7..52655e1 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
+config.mak
.gdbinit
*.a
*.d
*.o
*.flat
+*.elf
.pc
patches
.stgit-*
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Never appears to have done anything useful
---
x86/run-kvm-unit-tests | 6 --
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 x86/run-kvm-unit-tests
diff --git a/x86/run-kvm-unit-tests b/x86/run-kvm-unit-tests
deleted file mode 100644
index fed925a..000
--- a/x86/run-kvm-unit-tests
Some tests want extra arguments as enumerated in unittests.cfg,
use them.
unittests.cfg also has a few sections about invoking certains tests
with different combinations of options, but x86-run doesn't do
anything with that.
---
x86-run | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
Main motivation here is in the next patch: getting access to ConfigParser
for pulling extra options out of x86/unittests.cfg. Also makes it
easier to get a consistent exit code on failure.
---
v2: Don't drop manual examples from README
README | 14 +---
x86-run | 113
On 04/14/2013 09:40 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 02:30:27PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 03/20/2013 03:06 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:58:56PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 03/17/2013 11:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:59:42AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 04/14/2013 11:53 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Initializing them only when they're actually needed will do the trick
here.
Not initializing, adding the buffers. In the current spec, initialization
is always done before
Just to interject here... all this is about host kernel vs userspace, correct?
I.e. nothing that affects the guest. I assume that the guest sees CPUID and
that is what is supported.
Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:41:07AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Currently
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The logic for checking if interrupts can be injected has to be applied
also on NMIs. The difference is that if NMI interception is on these
events are consumed and blocked by the VM exit.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:36:29AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Just to interject here... all this is about host kernel vs userspace,
correct? I.e. nothing that affects the guest. I assume that the guest
sees CPUID and that is what is supported.
Actually, currently the guest sees MOVBE in
That is what I mean yes...
Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:36:29AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Just to interject here... all this is about host kernel vs userspace,
correct? I.e. nothing that affects the guest. I assume that the guest
sees CPUID and that is
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:43:03AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
+#define EmulateOnUD ((u64)1 46) /* emulate if unsupported by the host
*/
Just rename VendorSpecific to EmulateOnUD. The meaning is the same.
done.
+static int em_movbe(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
+{
+ switch
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Pekka Enberg penb...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Lin Ming min...@gmail.com wrote:
I run poweroff or halt in SDL window, but the window does not exit
although guest is already halted. But qemu can exit properly.
Is it because hlt
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:59:42AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 04/14/2013 11:53 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Initializing them only when they're actually needed will do the trick
here.
Not initializing, adding the buffers. In the current
Add basic documentation for virtio-9p. I can expand more on device operation,
but I don't think there's anything significant enough for the spec to be
mentioned there. Please let me know if I'm wrong.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com
---
virtio-spec.lyx | 206
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:08:47PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Enabling this capability connects the vcpu to the designated in-kernel
MPIC. Using explicit connections between vcpus and irqchips allows
for flexibility, but the main benefit at the moment is that it
simplifies the code -- KVM
On 04/14/2013 11:16 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 04/14/2013 06:01 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 05:23:41PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 04/12/2013 07:36 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com writes:
On 04/11/2013 12:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hello
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:08:47PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Enabling this capability connects the vcpu to the designated in-kernel
MPIC. Using explicit connections between vcpus and irqchips allows
for flexibility, but the main benefit at the moment is that it
simplifies the code -- KVM
67 matches
Mail list logo
