On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:27:51AM +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
> > My branch of the Gelato Federation (http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/)
> > wants to invest time and effort into IA64 KVM which could mean helping
> > with a merge, streamlining code, benchmarking, bug hunting or
> > something else along
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>Thanks for your suggestions. It is a surely good idea to create a
> IA64 mailing list to talk about the IA64-KVM. But now we have to rebase
> them to latest commits before sending out, since the kvm source layout
> changed much recently. Once the final source layout com
Caleb Moore wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 09:00 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> Hi Xiantao,
>>
>>Perhaps more people would be able to help restructure the tree to
>> support more architectures if a snapshot of the kvm/ia64 code was
>> made available. We might want to think about a kvm-ia64-
>
> I agree.
>
> My branch of the Gelato Federation (http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/)
> wants to invest time and effort into IA64 KVM which could mean helping
> with a merge, streamlining code, benchmarking, bug hunting or
> something else along those lines. We've already got an open source
> Ita
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 09:29 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> H, Alex/Akio
>Thanks for your suggestions. It is a surely good idea to create a
> IA64 mailing list to talk about the IA64-KVM. But now we have to rebase
> them to latest commits before sending out, since the kvm source layout
> chan
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 09:00 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Hi Xiantao,
>
>Perhaps more people would be able to help restructure the tree to
> support more architectures if a snapshot of the kvm/ia64 code was made
> available. We might want to think about a kvm-ia64-devel mailing list
> too (
Akio Takebe wrote:
> Hi, Alex and Xiantao
>
>> Perhaps more people would be able to help restructure the tree to
>> support more architectures if a snapshot of the kvm/ia64 code was
>> made available. We might want to think about a kvm-ia64-devel
>> mailing list too (such as ppc has already).
Hi, Alex and Xiantao
> Perhaps more people would be able to help restructure the tree to
>support more architectures if a snapshot of the kvm/ia64 code was made
>available. We might want to think about a kvm-ia64-devel mailing list
>too (such as ppc has already). Thanks,
>
I also think so. :)
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 18:21 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Caleb Moore wrote:
>
> > Is such a merge likely in the near future or should we proceed in
> > creating our own port?
>
> Hi, Caleb
> We have completed kvm IA64 port until the end of Aug, and showed a
> demo in kvm forum of Aug. T
Caleb Moore wrote:
> Is such a merge likely in the near future or should we proceed in
> creating our own port?
Hi, Caleb
We have completed kvm IA64 port until the end of Aug, and showed a
demo in kvm forum of Aug. Then, we could successfully boot windows, and
Linux guest on open guest fir
Hi,
We are interested in an IA64 port of KVM, either experimenting with
someone else's or writing our own. I've tried getting in contact with Yu
Fenghua of Intel but it seems that we will be unable to get hold of
their source code until it is in the main tree.
Is such a merge likely in the near f
11 matches
Mail list logo