Hiho,
--On Tuesday, June 19, 2007 13:41:07 +0100 Richard Hughes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 08:33 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
[...]
I actually extracted the patch set yesterday for the Fedora kernel and
it's in today's rawhide kernel. Should be a good way to get some ext
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 08:33 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 11:05 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 11:10 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >> I posted a patchset which does just that, when the F kernel
> > >> integrates
> > >> it (through
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 11:05 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 11:10 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> I posted a patchset which does just that, when the F kernel
> >> integrates
> >> it (through inclusion of 2.6.23 or by patching the current kernel),
> >> Fedo
Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 11:10 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> I posted a patchset which does just that, when the F kernel
>> integrates
>> it (through inclusion of 2.6.23 or by patching the current kernel),
>> Fedora will be able to suspend/resume just fine.
>>
>
> I'
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 11:10 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> I posted a patchset which does just that, when the F kernel
> integrates
> it (through inclusion of 2.6.23 or by patching the current kernel),
> Fedora will be able to suspend/resume just fine.
I've tried the current kvm kernel git tree
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> Well if there were a way to discover running KVM instances and
> communicate with them, then we wouldn't need to keep a daemon as a
> parent process for libvirt access and control. It's a point I would
> love to see solved at the QEmu level, but it's not really urgent :-)
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:19:09AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 11:10 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > Does anybod know why libvirt does not detect my running qemu VM (that
> > > uses KVM acceleration)? I get:
> > >
> > If you start a virtual machine outside libvirt's knowledg
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 11:10 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> No no no. The proper fix will have suspend "just working", whether or
> not a virtual machine is running or not. When you resume, the virtual
> machines continue running as if nothing had happened.
Ahh gotcha. In which case I apologize, I
Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 10:02 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>>> "Are you sure you want to suspend your computer with a running
>>>
>> virtual
>>
>>> machine?"
>>>
>>>
>> Why invest in workarounds when a fix is available?
>>
>
> Totally agree. I was r
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 10:02 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > "Are you sure you want to suspend your computer with a running
> virtual
> > machine?"
> >
>
> Why invest in workarounds when a fix is available?
Totally agree. I was really looking for a proper fix, e.g. use libvirt
to suspend the virtu
Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 15:30 +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
>>> Is there any easy way we can detect if virtual machines are running?
>>>
>> The module use counts will be elevanted and they'll refuse to unload
>> (or there's a nasty bug somewhere).
>>
>
> Nahh,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 07:36:18PM +0200, Luca wrote:
> On 6/16/07, Richard Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 15:30 +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> >>
> >> > Is there any easy way we can detect if virtual machines are running?
> >>
> >> The module use counts will be elevant
On 6/16/07, Richard Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 15:30 +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any easy way we can detect if virtual machines are running?
> >
> > The module use counts will be elevanted and they'll refuse to unload
> > (or there's a nasty bug s
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 15:30 +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
> > Is there any easy way we can detect if virtual machines are running?
>
> The module use counts will be elevanted and they'll refuse to unload
> (or there's a nasty bug somewhere).
Nahh, that's too brutal. Is there a way to (hypothet
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:29:34AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Is there any easy way we can detect if virtual machines are running?
The module use counts will be elevanted and they'll refuse to unload
(or there's a nasty bug somewhere).
Cheers,
Muli
--
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 10:53 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting lots of bug reports about installing kvm and then suspend
> > breaking. Some background: when the fedora package kvm is installed,
> > then the kvm and kvm_xxx modules get auto loaded at boot. T
Richard Hughes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting lots of bug reports about installing kvm and then suspend
> breaking. Some background: when the fedora package kvm is installed,
> then the kvm and kvm_xxx modules get auto loaded at boot. To get the
> machine to suspend again, the modules have to be rmmo
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 09:27 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:56 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > I'm getting lots of bug reports about installing kvm and then suspend
> > breaking. Some background: when the fedora package kvm is installed,
> > then the kvm and kvm_xxx modules ge
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:56 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> I'm getting lots of bug reports about installing kvm and then suspend
> breaking. Some background: when the fedora package kvm is installed,
> then the kvm and kvm_xxx modules get auto loaded at boot. To get the
> machine to suspend again,
Hi,
I'm getting lots of bug reports about installing kvm and then suspend
breaking. Some background: when the fedora package kvm is installed,
then the kvm and kvm_xxx modules get auto loaded at boot. To get the
machine to suspend again, the modules have to be rmmod'd on suspend and
then modprobe'
20 matches
Mail list logo
