Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

Thomas Hackert wrote: >would this discussion not more suitable after the 4.2 release ;? An en_US L10N team should have been created back when TDF was setting up LibOP. Whilst waiting is always optional, by setting up something now, there is a fairly good chance that the en_US version of LibO

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

Hi all My grain of salt there. I strongly believe we need to cross-talk, so I go on cross-posting. Le Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:54:05 +0100, Sophie a écrit: Hi Andras, all, Le 12/12/2013 11:18, Andras Timar a écrit : On 2013.12.11. 17:19, Sophie wrote: *About the en_US overall quality Furt

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Typo in Calc and one question related to Base/Writer

Hi Eike, Thanks for your commits. Regards 2013/12/12 Eike Rathke > Hi Sérgio, > > On Thursday, 2013-12-12 16:55:23 +, Sérgio Marques wrote: > > > issue > > Done. > > Eike > > -- > LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i

[libreoffice-l10n] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.4 RC2 available

Dear Community, The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release candidate of LibreOffice 4.1.4. The upcoming 4.1.4 will be the fourth in a sequence of frequent bugfix releases for our feature-packed 4.1 line. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.1.4 RC2 is not been flagged as ready

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Typo in Calc and one question related to Base/Writer

Hi Sérgio, On Thursday, 2013-12-12 16:55:23 +, Sérgio Marques wrote: > issue Done. Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GPG key ID: 0x65632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C D5B7

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Typo in Calc and one question related to Base/Writer

Hi Eike, Sorry for postig unrelated issue here but can you have a look on this issue ? It´s Calc and OpenFormula related so I this you´re the one to contact. Regards 2013/12/12 Eike Rathke > Hi Mateusz, > > On Monday, 2013-12-09 14:12:21

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Typo in Calc and one question related to Base/Writer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Em 12-12-2013 14:36, Eike Rathke escreveu: >> > https://translations.documentfoundation.org/pl/libo_ui/sw/translate.html#unit=48540980 > That's odd, they look like identifier labels, but apparently are not. > I _think_ they are translatable, and or

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Typo in Calc and one question related to Base/Writer

Hi Mateusz, On Monday, 2013-12-09 14:12:21 +0100, Mateusz Zasuwik wrote: > Is it translatable? > > https://translations.documentfoundation.org/pl/libo_ui/officecfg/translate.html#unit=48540897 That "Base: Database Form" like all those other "Base: ..." are UI names, so yes, translatable. > htt

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Typo in Calc and one question related to Base/Writer

Hi Mateusz, On Monday, 2013-12-09 14:12:21 +0100, Mateusz Zasuwik wrote: > >Cumulated. TRUE calculates the probabilty mass function, FALSE the > cumulative distribution function. > > probabilty > probability Thanks, fixed in master and 4-2 source, should be available after next Pootle update.

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] l10n process, en_US version, Help files

Hi, 2013/12/12 Andras Timar > It is OK to fix new strings, also it is OK to fix obvious typos > anywhere. But we should refrain from re-phrasing old messages. It > would make a lot of unnecessary work for translators, and loss of > translation for unmaintaned languages. IMHO we have more importa

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

Hi Christian, Le 12/12/2013 13:56, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : > Hi Sophie, *, > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Sophie wrote: >> [...] >> *Before updating Pootle: >> - it's important for l10n team to know the approx load of work that will >> be needed to achieve the whole work. Time between

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

Hi Christian, On 2013.12.12. 13:56, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Yes, 4.2.0 was the first time I did update the projects in pootle, and > I personally think it was not a huge desaster. There were two > stumbling stones: > 1) update_against_templates aborting because of added/renamed files > 2) lots

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

Hi Sophie, *, On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Sophie wrote: >[...] > *Before updating Pootle: > - it's important for l10n team to know the approx load of work that will > be needed to achieve the whole work. Time between beta1 and rc1 is short > and that will help to better organize this time be

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

Hi *, On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Sophie wrote: > Le 11/12/2013 19:24, Thomas Hackert a écrit : >> [...] >> would this discussion not more suitable after the 4.2 release ;? > > Only answering your question: nope, because 4.3 is already on the radar, > so that would be great to have something

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

Hi Andras, all, Le 12/12/2013 11:18, Andras Timar a écrit : > On 2013.12.11. 17:19, Sophie wrote: >> *About the en_US overall quality >> - the process to rely on the l10n team to fix the en_US version is ok, >> even if it gives us extra work to understand what is meant before we >> realized it's a

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

On 2013.12.12. 0:35, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Sophie wrote: > >> *After RC1 and l10n integration >> - we need to know when integration is made after our fixes, there is >> currently no communication on this > > Perhaps documenting the process in some pages on the

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] l10n process, en_US version, Help files

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Stanislav Horáček wrote: >> - but that doesn't solve the several typos that already exist and that >> are overlooked by the l10n team (e.g in the Character > Font Effect >> dialog, there is Overline _c_olor and Underline _C_olor and this is the >> same for several

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] l10n process, en_US version, Help files

Hi Sophie, all, thank you very much for this initiative - it is really needed. My few notes: *After RC1 and l10n integration - we need to know when integration is made after our fixes, there is currently no communication on this This can be found in the log of translations git module: http://

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

Hi Robinson, Le 12/12/2013 00:35, Robinson Tryon a écrit : > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Sophie wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This mail is posted to the dev list and the l10n list, please follow up >> on the l10n list. >> >> I would like to open a discussion on the l10n workflow, the quality of >>