[LARTC] Multiple routing query

on things to try? Thanks in advance, Mike. -- -- Mike Harris Psand.net Tlf: +44 7811 671 893 / +34 69 676 3122 / +44 870 162 4927 ext 2 Fax: +44 870 162 4925 Web: http://psand.net PGP: http://www.psand.net/mike/mike.gpg.pub IRC: irc://irc.psand.net:6667/#psand -- Psand Limited

Re: [LARTC] Multiple routing query

along. Many thanks for that again Peter, Mike. Mensaje citado por Peter Rabbitson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mike Harris wrote: I test this using ping but it doesn't seem to work properly, whichever interface is set as the default route becomes just that. So 'ping -I eth0 lartc.org' works

[LARTC] Split access multi-route problem - need help.

configuration is correct and perhaps shed some light on other things that I may have overlooked, such as the correct kernel modules etc. For reference the install is Debian Etch, kernel 2.6.18-5-amd64. Any help much appreciated, Thanks in advance, Mike. -- -- Mike Harris Psand.net Tlf: +44

[LARTC] newbie needs policing help

if the above rules make any sense :( ) Any helpers out there? TIA, Mike Wright :m) ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[LARTC] route to a host behind and ipsec tunnel

Hi there, I have a client who has several branch offices, they are adding a system that uses a PC in the main office to create a PPTP connection to the Applications host. So, locally I specify a route on my gateway to handle this. ip route add 1.2.3.4/20 via 192.168.24.4 (Firewall

[LARTC] restricting bandwidth using TC

having is that the bandwidth exceeds the 12 Meg by almost 5 Meg. Any help is appreciated. Thanks Mike Pearson ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: VoIP using just prio qdisc? No. was [ [LARTC] Sanity Check ]

On Monday 26 June 2006 08:27, Martin A. Brown wrote: Good morning, Mike, : I need a sanity check. I'm trying to setup my network to handle : VoIP. I'm thinking that all I need to do is prioritize the : realtime traffic above the interactive and bulk traffic. I see : so much discussion about

[LARTC] Sanity Check

Hi all. I need a sanity check. I'm trying to setup my network to handle VoIP. I'm thinking that all I need to do is prioritize the realtime traffic above the interactive and bulk traffic. I see so much discussion about traffic shapping, but I don't THINK this is needed, right? I understand

Re: [LARTC] 2 WAN - 1 LAN - ping and route problem

, Mike Wright :m) ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] HOWTO unmaintained?

I don't even think this is list is being maintained. Several people have tried to unsubscribe. From: Ed W [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Georg C. F. Greve [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Andreas Klauer [EMAIL PROTECTED],lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: Re: [LARTC] HOWTO unmaintained? Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005

Re: [LARTC] Unsubsription impossible

I too wish to unsubscribe. Several attempts have been unsuccessful. Thanks - Original Message - From: Thomas Heinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 5:50 PM Subject: [LARTC] Unsubsription impossible

[LARTC] ARP, EAP, and Wireless Security

direction that you could provide. Best regards, Mike attachment: winmail.dat___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[LARTC] Resetting traffic history

suggestions? I've shut down the problem site and disabled tc while I try to figure out a solution. Thanks for your help! Mike mslinn at mslinn.com

[LARTC] Apologies

Seems I sent an HTML message to the listserv by mistake. Sorry! Mike ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [Fwd: Re: [LARTC] ssh and cs LAG]

We had no problems with smp on 2.6.8.3, and since this cpu supports hyperthreading we enjoy a *big* power boost using smp. :) Mike Andy Furniss wrote: Hariett Jones wrote: Got some solutions myself. LAG is caused by : NETDEV WATCHDOG eth0 timeout this is caused bacause of problems with rtl8139

RE: [LARTC] Layer 7 netfilter not working

Add -i eth0 if eth0 is your outward facing interface, you may also have to place the mark in PREROUTING. It's been a while since I fiddled and am kind of fuzzy ATM about iptables packet traversal. Mike. -Original Message- From: FB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004

RE: [LARTC] Layer 7 netfilter not working

Everyone, Don't you mark on the inbound interface and shape on the outbound interface? Mike Fetherston -Original Message- From: FB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 1:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [LARTC] Layer 7 netfilter not working Hello there! I

RE: [LARTC] Layer 7 netfilter not working

You may be marking on the ingress interface. Locally generated packets do not go through that NIC and therefore do not get marked. You would have to mark them on the INPUT chain of your egress interface. Mike Fetherston -Original Message- From: FB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

[LARTC] Re: Modems: Cable or DSL digital blunders that lartc may help with.

--- Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ed Wildgoose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You need something which works at IP level or above. TCP (level higher) has some stuff, but (I repeat) it basically involves dropping traffic until the sender slows down. There are protocols like ECN, but

[LARTC] Fwd: Re: IPP2P: Simular project l7-filter.

--- Mike Mestnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:51:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Mestnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IPP2P: Simular project l7-filter. To: Eicke Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Eicke Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Mestnik wrote: http

Re: [LARTC] Modems: Cable or DSL digital blunders that lartc may help with.

Yes, I do understand the LARTC and wondershaper. As for ADSL-qos I didn't, but I did read all the TCP rfcs regarding packet lose and throughput negotiation, ect. --- Ed Wildgoose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, SwFC is lame. Howerver it would be a good band-aid, to have router and modem

[LARTC] IPP2P: Simular project l7-filter.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/l7-filter/ Providse and posibly replaces your project. Thay use regex(in kernel space) to filter packets in much the same way you do. How ever regex is not going into the kernel! Here is a mail that describes the situation.

Re: [LARTC] HTB: 3. Sharing hierarchy

I finaly found why my filters woulden't work, I was using grouping maches up with quotation() chars. This caused tc to silently IGNORE thoes matches while letting other non-quotated matches to work normaly, within the same tc cmd. I reworked my whole script to use 10:0 as the parent for filters,

Re: [LARTC] HTB: 3. Sharing hierarchy

I finaly found why my filters woulden't work, I was using grouping maches up with quotation() chars. This caused tc to silently IGNORE thoes matches while letting other non-quotated matches to work normaly, within the same tc cmd. I reworked my whole script to use 10:0 as the parent for filters,

Re: [LARTC] Modems: Cable or DSL digital blunders that lartc may help with.

--- Ed Wildgoose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mike, Cable, being Asymetrical, is able to upload at a given rate and hopefully has a buffer, in the modem, of some kind. When I nc(netcat) to a UDP echo, or discard, server I get about 10Mbps out on my ethernet, but only 256Kbps acctualy

Re: [LARTC] Modems: Cable or DSL digital blunders that lartc may help with.

--- Ed Wildgoose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.lammertbies.nl/comm/info/RS-232_flow_control.html ECN is software flow control. There is also icmp for software FC? The idea is too prevent 'buffer underruns' in the modem, any SNMP or other stats on this buffer would also provide SWFC.

[LARTC] HTB: Packet header size option.

--- On Wed, 05 May 2004 14:01:28 +0100 Andy Furniss Wrote: I forgot to say - if you use DSL tweaking uprate right upto the limit with bulk traffic may not be a good idea. There are atm overheads and thay are greater (as %) for small packets eg. htb counts empy ack as 40 bytes but it's 106

[LARTC] HTB: 3. Sharing hierarchy

On http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm... There is a nice explanation on how/why to setup a hierarchy with HTB. Howerver what is missing is how to setup finters for this case? I had this working when I was using a seperat qdisc for each ?layer?, making each HTB only one level

[LARTC] Modems: Cable or DSL digital blunders that lartc may help with.

I have a Cable 'modem' that has a problem that many of these devices is bound to have. I was wondering what other lartc user thought about this and if DSL has simular problems. Cable, being Asymetrical, is able to upload at a given rate and hopefully has a buffer, in the modem, of some kind.

RE: [LARTC] shaping

Not the answer you're looking for, but why not just specify your total bandwidth being much larger than your interface actually is and then subdividing into your groups? Mike. -Original Message- From: Abraham van der Merwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 8:58 AM

[LARTC] Monitoring qdisks and classes.

Are there any tools like iptraf or top to display tc stats? I would like to see things like flowes(TCP or UDP connections) as well as simple per second stats. I'm trying to monitor my p2p uploads and network connections to see if things are getting into the right class. I used to use mrtg for

[LARTC] IPSec Questions

? 2. How do I handle it when my IP address changes, as in example.com, here. Thanx in advance. - -- Mike gpg key: http://diehlnet.com/~mdiehl/mdiehl.asc 83AD D927 758D 4BFC A800 0277 4B26 75A4 F0D1 C7EB -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAV9kWSyZ1pPDRx

[LARTC] RE: Anyone using PCI/USB xDSL under Linux?

may want to try LinuxQuestions.org as well. Mike (a.k.a. AWEV) __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

RE: [LARTC] limiting p2p

POSTROUTING 1 -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -L -n -v -x should show you some hits in the POSTROUTING chain now :-) Hope that helps, Mike. -- GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...) jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http

RE: [LARTC] limiting p2p

. Regards, Mike. -- GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...) jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel +++ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo

Re: [LARTC] network monitor

I need to know what is going on/in/out on my network.Now I know of ntop and mrtg's but aren't there something different If you're looking for a console based tool try iptraf to monitor current stats of network devices. Regards, Mike. -- GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz

RE: [LARTC] limiting p2p

? Regards, Mike -- GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...) jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel +++ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo

RE: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases

Can you even shape on aliases? I thought you could only shape on the actual device. Why not shape on the source or destination IP? Mike. -Original Message- From: Gordan Bobic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LARTC

RE: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases

Yes: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07410.html search for the text alias bummer. Mike. -Original Message- From: Gordan Bobic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP

RE: [LARTC] Controlling only delay using HTB without stealing excess bandwidth

I disagree here. You can easily use IPTables to mark packets based on just about anything (source/dest IP, MAC, source/dest port, etc). You can then use those marks to assign traffic to the HTB classes you wish. Mike Fetherston -Original Message- From: Roy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [LARTC] mangle

). This is done on my external NIC. Mike Fetherston -Original Message- From: Eddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 10:02 AM To: Mike Subject: RE: [LARTC] mangle So you put all rules on your internal interface? On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 16:43, Mike wrote

[LARTC] Split Access Problems

Security. Mike Taekema [EMAIL PROTECTED]www.netmaster.comPage

Re: [LARTC] Packet mangling latency

mangling performace in 2.6. It's not exactly what you want to know but have a look at http://ilabws13.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~mai97bwf/delay.html Hope that helps a little. Mike -- NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Fotos, Musik, Dateien... Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gruß

[LARTC] REJECTing: How and When to use What type of reply.

For this thread I'd like to FOCUS on rejecting bad traffic and not on dropping. The first case I'd like to discuss is where all but a handful of public web sites are allowed for ought going connections. A typical NAT setup is used where all the users sit behind a firewall, some have full

RE: [LARTC] REJECTing: How and When to use What type of reply.

--- Daniel Chemko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # Original Message: For this thread I'd like to FOCUS on rejecting bad traffic and not on dropping. The first case I'd like to discuss is where all but a handful of public web sites are allowed for ought going connections. A

Re: [LARTC] HTB_debug_dump: is annoying :) [Pach included]

, some class has too small rate\n,min_delay); --- Trevor Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry Mike, This isn't an answer to your queries but instead a question. I would like to know if there are any added fields to the tc -s -d output post application

[LARTC] HTB_debug_dump: is annoying :) [Pach included]

I use MRTG to graph tc -d output, so the debug_dump fills up my dmesg logs ect. It's just annoying. Attached is a patch vs 2.5.74 and my MRTG script. __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com linux-2.5.74.htbdebug.patch

[LARTC] Traffic Shaping with fwmark/IPTables

the firewall, or am I doing something wrong? Probably the latter. Attached is my script. If it's horrible please forgive my newbie-ness, if it's great forget that previous statement!! ;P Mike Fetherston # eth0 - outside NIC # eth1 - inside NIC tc qdisc del dev eth0 root handle 1: tc qdisc del dev

RE: [LARTC] Scenario Issue

requested an ip. Or use dhcpcd to bind IP's to MAC addresses.. You can do quasi-static IP's that way. An entry in /etc/dhcpcd.conf would look like this: host HOST-NAME { hardware ethernet MAC ADDRESS; fixed-address IP ADDRESS; } Mike. ___ LARTC

[LARTC] Commercial Alternatives

Hi all. I'm putting together a few proposals for a client who has a T3 with four 4down1up cable modems. They want to loadbalance the bandwidth. I am going to propose a linux box to do this but for completeness sake I am curious what products do others use to do this. I am toying with the

[LARTC] Complicated Route Statement

Hi there. I am having trouble coming up with a routing statement for the following Lan A is connected to LAn B via a Freeswan site to site VPN On lab B there is a cisco router which is handles traffic for an IP address. I need to find a way to have traffic to this Other machine routed

[LARTC] Multiple Static Ip's on a adls connection

Hi all. I have recently signed up with a adsl supplier. I ordered static ip's I was given a block from 153-158. I am trying to make it so that each machine gets a live ip address that is accessable on the wan. I am using floppyfw as my router on a p200. I know that I could setup the the