Greetings,
Hi,
I've been experiencing problems with HTB where the whole machine locks
up. This usually happens when the whole qdisc is being removed and
occasionally when a leaf is being removed.
You may be interested in reading these two:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9318
gypsy wrote:
gypsy wrote:
tc qdisc add dev eth0.2 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1 ceil
1 burst 100 quantum 1600
tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb prio 1 rate
7000 ceil 7000 burst 100 quantum 1600
tc
gypsy wrote:
tc qdisc add dev eth0.2 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1 ceil
1 burst 100 quantum 1600
tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb prio 1 rate
7000 ceil 7000 burst 100 quantum 1600
tc
On 9/18/07, hhoxha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi every body
I have a linux server with Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz , and 2 Gigabit
of RAM , kernel version 2.6.22.6 , and 2 Intel 82541PI Gigabit Ethernet
controllers
In simple situation i would like to limit bandwidth for 2 customers
Hello.
I have a benchmark setup where I try to shape the traffic of
3000 concurrent tcp connection using HTB and hash tables.
The machine doing the shaping is running Debian 4.0 with Linux kernel
2.6.18 and has two 1 Gbps ethernet interfaces (in and out).
During the testing everything is going
Hi,
how long is the period over that the htb rate of a class will be estimated? on
a site i read 10 sec but the update rate is 10 sec. i think the average rate
determination is nearly 120 seconds?
What is the exact meaning of requeues? If one packet must be 5 times requeued
this statistics
Hi every body
I have a linux server with Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz , and 2 Gigabit
of RAM , kernel version 2.6.22.6 , and 2 Intel 82541PI Gigabit Ethernet
controllers
In simple situation i would like to limit bandwidth for 2 customers 1) (
to 34 Mb/s ) and 2) 68 Mb/s .
My conf is
On 16 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose we have simple router with upstream interface connected
to internet (eth0) and downstream interface connected to lan (eth1).
Lan uses private addressing so there is NAT rule used for traffic
leaving eth0.
You can redirect lan-internet traffic
Hi everyone,
I have a small problem. I have my debian server setup in my home.
I have setup htb that is working perfectly.
The only problem I have is to control the traffic server - internet
I have a daemon (bittorrent) and I would like to limit its download to a
certail amount. How can I do
On 15 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a small problem. I have my debian server setup in my home.
I have setup htb that is working perfectly.
The only problem I have is to control the traffic server - internet
I have a daemon (bittorrent) and I would like to limit its
Any idea how to control that traffic (serv - net)
Its the same problems with apt etc etc When I use it, it uses the
entire amount of bandwidth...
You can shape download to server on ingress using IFB:
http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php?title=IFB
IMQ could also be helpfull, but IFB is included
On 15 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can shape download to server on ingress using IFB:
http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php?title=IFB
But AFAIK at the moment practically only if there is no NAT involved (or
if you do not want to classify de-nated traffic).
Any news regarding this
Is quantum not perhaps a bit high? Try setting it lower, and see what
happens?
-justin
On 2007-08-29 08:06, Martin Björnsson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me
results I
expect. I've created 4 HTB classes:
1:10 TCP ACKs
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me
results I
expect. I've created 4 HTB classes:
1:10 TCP ACKs (prio 0)
1:20 TCP traffic on dst port 10001 (prio 1)
1:30 TCP traffic on dst port 1 (prio 2)
1:40 Default
Martin Björnsson pisze:
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me
results I
expect. I've created 4 HTB classes:
1:10 TCP ACKs (prio 0)
1:20 TCP traffic on dst port 10001 (prio 1)
1:30 TCP traffic on dst port 1 (prio 2)
1:40
Yes, exactly. So my 1:20 class (prio 1) should get to send more than the 1:30
class. But
it doesn't, they both get about the same throughput.
Nobody else having problems with the prio parameter?
Martin
bartekR wrote:
Martin Björnsson pisze:
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio
Hello Martin,
I used to have this kind of problem before. Not sure if I resolved it
with the help of folks on this mailing list, but I never tested.
What you can try is to remove the prio parameter from the classes and
leave the prio only for the filters.
Let us know if that helps.
Cheers,
Hi Andy :)
* Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
DervishD wrote:
I've thought that the culprit may be cpufreq. I have cpufreq scaling
activated, and cpufreq reduces the clock speed from 1800MHz to 1000MHz
when the processor is idle. This is more or less the same amount that I
lose
DervishD wrote:
I'll start a new thread here for this and will report to LKML too.
OK you should probably report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than LKML.
Andy.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
Hi Andy :)
* Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
DervishD wrote:
I'll start a new thread here for this and will report to LKML too.
OK you should probably report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than LKML.
I was considering it, but then I thought that maybe this problem was
known
DervishD wrote:
Hi all :)
I've been using a tc setup for almost two years, but at some point
(probably when I switched to kernel 2.6.x, but I'm not sure) it has
started making something very weird.
For a certain class, the rate is 125000bit and the ceil is
27bit, but the
Hi all :)
I've been using a tc setup for almost two years, but at some point
(probably when I switched to kernel 2.6.x, but I'm not sure) it has
started making something very weird.
For a certain class, the rate is 125000bit and the ceil is
27bit, but the fastest rate I get is
Marco C. Coelho wrote:
I've got a linux (2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.centos.plus) router doing pppoe
termination and HTB rate limiting.
the number of connections has grown quite a bit in the last few months,
and I'm now getting a:
HTB tree is too deep
message on the monitor.
where is the setting
I've got a linux (2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.centos.plus) router doing pppoe
termination and HTB rate limiting.
the number of connections has grown quite a bit in the last few months,
and I'm now getting a:
HTB tree is too deep
message on the monitor.
where is the setting for max depth?
Edouard Thuleau wrote:
Hi all,
I patch my kernel (2.6.17) and my tc (iproute2-2.6.18-061002) utilitie for
an accurate packet scheduling on an ATM link.
I configure my HTB hierarchy on the upload of the link and try with
differents flows.
It works correctly but in some of case I lose about 50%
Hi all,
I patch my kernel (2.6.17) and my tc (iproute2-2.6.18-061002) utilitie for
an accurate packet scheduling on an ATM link.
I configure my HTB hierarchy on the upload of the link and try with
differents flows.
It works correctly but in some of case I lose about 50% of my bandwith.
I use
Ranko Zivojnovic wrote:
Greetings,
I've been experiencing problems with HTB where the whole machine locks
up. This usually happens when the whole qdisc is being removed and
occasionally when a leaf is being removed.
Common is that it always happens when some sort of removal is in
progress.
Marco Aurelio ha scritto:
What exactly happens if the sum of the children classes rate is bigger
than the parent's?
HTB will assign to the leaf the rate regardeless of the value of the
parent's rate.
The parent's rate is used only to compute how much bandwith must be
allocated to the leaf's
What exactly happens if the sum of the children classes rate is bigger
than the parent's?
What if the majority of these classes are using less than the minimum
rate established (eg. 0kbps)?
--
Marco Casaroli
SapucaiNet Telecom
+55 35 34712377 ext 5
Hi I am current trying to set up a guaranteed minimum rate for the leaf
(1:1x). Also would I be correct in saying that the quantum is the
dividing rule (so if I keep it the same 1532 and keep all the leafs in
1:1x prio 3 they should all get the same amount of bandwidth shared
across them
original at: http://www.praga.org.ar/wacko/DevPraga/htbgen
Htb-gen has evolved a lot since it release in feb/2006, but i have no
time to make a public decent documented and generalized release.
But right now i think that is better to put the stuff here, so others can
enjoy the notorious
Hey,
i saw a related question made by another user in this list, but i still do
not understanding how to do it or each values put.
I have HTB rules in a ISP and i control for each customer this way:
Flush and 1:0 class
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0
Pablo Fernandes Yahoo wrote:
I would like to have the customer using 150kbit stable in a download. But at
the begining of the conection, i would like to have a 200kbit burst.
Depends what you mean - burst is an amount of data not a bitrate. If you
want them (using your setup) to have 25k of
Michael Fincham wrote:
Hey everyone,
For some reason my htb configuration isn't allowing any class to burst
up to its ceiling ever, even when the link is only being utilised by one
class that class only ever gets its assigned rate and exactly that
assigned rate...
The hierarchy I have is 1: at
actual script to say for sure.
Jon Flechsenhaar
Boeing WNW Team
Network Services
(714)-762-1231
202-E7
-Original Message-
From: Michael Fincham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:23 PM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: [LARTC] HTB and burst...
Hey
On Thursday 26 April 2007 19:34, terraja-based wrote:
Hi folks,
Hi!
Hola!
I`ve a problem to use HTB and SFQ.
The first script, below, to show a simple configuration, does work
fine...!!!
But, in the second example, does not work, becouse i put more code to
clasify the traffic by protocol,
Hi folks,
I`ve a problem to use HTB and SFQ.
The first script, below, to show a simple configuration, does work
fine...!!!
But, in the second example, does not work, becouse i put more code to
clasify the traffic by protocol, http and ftp in this case.
Somebody can tell me the errors?
Thx, in
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:01:02 +0200, Radu Oprisan wrote
Bc.Slavomir Danas wrote:
I'm trying to access shared folders (samba) on ip 10.4.10.10 from
my
laptop with ip 172.16.0.2.
Everything works as expected when downloading or uploading (correctly
shaped and policed at 1Mbit). But when I
Hi all,
I patch my kernel (2.6.17) and my tc (iproute2-2.6.18-061002) utilitie for
an accurate packet scheduling on an ATM link.
I configure my HTB hierarchy on the upload of the link and try with
differents flows.
It works correctly but in some of case I lose about 50% of my bandwith.
I use the
This is my simple situation:
I want to policy download and shape upload going through my router.
It has two interfaces: eth0 (10.4.10.222/24 connected to LAN) and eth1
(172.16.0.1/24 connected to my laptop).
My setup:
[eth1]
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 999
tc qdisc add dev
Bc.Slavomir Danas wrote:
I'm trying to access shared folders (samba) on ip 10.4.10.10 from my
laptop with ip 172.16.0.2.
Everything works as expected when downloading or uploading (correctly
shaped and policed at 1Mbit). But when I try to download and upload at
the same time, my speed drops
Hi,
we have upgraded a gateway machine for our network and suddenly
shaping doesn't work as it used to. Before the upgrade the traffic was
shaped correctly - both OUTPUT and FORWARD packets shared the same
class and it just worked. But now only FORWARD packets are shaped,
OUTPUT uses whole line
Hello all,
Probably a silly problem as a result of lack of understanding here, but I'm
having some trouble with a supposedly simple shaping script here.
I have a bunch of IPs on an interface tun0 (VPN clients) which I'm trying to
rate limit to 5Mbps default, and then set externally by a script
Flechsenhaar
Boeing WNW Team
Network Services
(714)-762-1231
202-E7
-Original Message-
From: Simone84bo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 3:05 PM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: [LARTC] HTB? (NEWBIE)
Hi to all
I am studying HTB on LARTC how to. I realize a simple
On Jan 20, 2007, at 12:05 AM, Simone84bo wrote:
Hi to all
I am studying HTB on LARTC how to. I realize a simple configuration on
router:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 3mbit burst 15k
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1
Hi to all
I am studying HTB on LARTC how to. I realize a simple configuration on
router:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 3mbit burst 15k
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k
tc class add dev
You should propably try:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 20
and not 30 cause your default class is 20 no?
On 1/20/07, Simone84bo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to all
I am studying HTB on LARTC how to. I realize a simple configuration on
router:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle
Hello
First of all : Happy new year !
Does anyone can explain me or give me resource of how can I setup burst
on HTB classes ...
I've got a 20Mb of bandwith with burst to ~ 24Mb
I haven't understand well how to cburst , burst parameters (calculate
values) !
Seems that If I don't specify
Hello,
I'm using shorewall at the moment, but I'm asking this because I'm
thinking on switching to htb from a script if this isn't possible from
shorewall.
Is it possible to get HTB to treat each individual IP in an IP range
as a separate leaf, so I don't have to insert a separate HTB rule for
Hi,
I have many example of HTB GUI . All is already well developed, which
discussed in this link.
However, can anyone teach me what software to use to build a own web based GUI
HTB software in Fedoracore ( Linux based) ? Thanks
Regards
Alan
Hi,
I have many example of HTB GUI . All is already well developed, which
discussed in this link.
However,
can anyone teach me what software to use to build a own web based GUI
HTB software in Fedoracore ( Linux based) ? Thanks
Regards
Alan
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of alan tan
Sent: Thursday, 23 November 2006 10:18 p.m.
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: [LARTC] HTB GUI
Hi,
I have many example of HTB GUI . All is already well developed,
which discussed in this link
http
.
Regards,
Mark
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of alan
tan
Sent: Thursday, 23 November 2006 10:18 p.m.
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: [LARTC] HTB GUI
Hi,
I have many example of HTB GUI
. All is already well developed, which discussed
Hi all,
Is the prio specification in the htb class global or is it on a per
class basis ?
A simple example:
class 1:10 parent 1:
class 1:100 parent 1:10 prio 3
class 1:200 parent 1:10 prio 7
class 1:201 parent 1:200 prio 1
class 1:202 parent 1:200 prio 2
Which class will get excessive
I have 2 nic card with fedora installed. Now, do i need to install any bridge
or gateway? or straight install and configue HTB? My objective is to limit
bandwidth in and out from the ethernet card.
Thanks
___
LARTC mailing list
My objective is to limit bandwidth through each user's IP\
THanks
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
plugthebox.net /dev/null wrote:
Hello,
hi
This process
kills my machine for 3-4 minutes until dumping all htb/sqf/iptables into
files and running these files (remember that i almost have 1200 IPs, and
each IP has 6 HTB+SFQ line with 2 iptables)
both iptables and tc have a batch mode, and both
Hello,
I'm working on a customized Linux firewall/router for a small/medium ISP
(1200 users) we have almost 4 ranges of internal IPs and i want to limit
each IP to a certain speed.
The problem is that i'm storing all info about the user including IP and
bandwidth rates on a MySQL server, then
own [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Thossapron Apinyapanha [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: lartc lartc lartc@mailman.ds9a.nlSent: Friday, October 13, 2006 7:56:02 PMSubject: Re: [LARTC] HTB has 2 bucket?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Greetinsg Thossapron,: in HTB use 2 bucket for manage 2 rate??? first bucket - ke
PROTECTED]To: Thossapron Apinyapanha [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: lartc lartc lartc@mailman.ds9a.nlSent: Friday, October 13, 2006 7:56:02 PMSubject: Re: [LARTC] HTB has 2 bucket?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Greetinsg Thossapron,: in HTB use 2 bucket for manage 2 rate??? first bucket - ke
in HTB use 2 bucket for manage 2 rate???
first bucket - keep token for sending with rate
second bucket - keep ctoken for sending with ceil rate
Is it true?? may be i'm misunderstand about token/bucket thoery___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetinsg Thossapron,
: in HTB use 2 bucket for manage 2 rate??? first bucket - keep
: token for sending with rate second bucket - keep ctoken for
: sending with ceil rate Is it true?? may be i'm misunderstand
: about token/bucket thoery
Yes,
Flechsenhaar, Jon J wrote:
I don't know if you answer basic HTB questions but I'l try anyway. I'm
implementing AF and EF with a root rate of 500 kbps (kilo bits per
second). I am using DSMARK to classify packets. I'm implementing this
on two different hardware sets PPC and x86 with the same
Please see below
Jon Flechsenhaar
Boeing WNW Team
Network Services
(714)-762-1231
202-E7
-Original Message-
From: Flechsenhaar, Jon J
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:30 AM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: FW: [LARTC] 2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken?
Please see below
Jon
*~ r a K u ~ * wrote:
I have a lot question about tc-command because now i'm doing research to compare
performance between HTB and HFSC
so i'm doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful to me ... My
question is
*In HTB tc command question*
1. I'm use opensource (Mastershaper) for
Namitha Rao wrote:
Hi
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004977.html
I have the same problem to discuss as in the above link. I want to allocate
say X MBit per individual connection regardless of the number of
connection
. KIndly could anyonen suggest me how to proceed.
I have
I have a lot question about tc-command because now i'm doing research to compare performance between HTB and HFSC so i'm doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful me ... my question is 1. I'm use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i'm try to config
f00ty wrote:
Hi all !
I'm building a network appliance whose goals are to enhance Voip
quality on 512/128k DSL links. But, i have a voice quality problem,
and i think i'm doing something wrong, but i can't find what. Please
excuse my terrible english, i'm french.
From what i've read, tc is
I have a lot question about tc-command because now i'm doing research to compare
performance between HTB and HFSC
so i'm doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful to me ... My question is
In HTB tc command question1. I'm use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic
I have a lot question about tc-command because now i'm doing research to compare performance between HTB and HFSC so i'm doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful me ... my question is
1. I'm use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i'm try to config
Hi
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004977.html
I have the same problem to discuss as in the above link. I want to
allocate say X MBit per individual connection regardless of the
number of connection . KIndly could anyonen suggest me how to proceed.
I have tried with SFq but is
El Thursday 14 September 2006 05:55, Namitha Rao escribió:
Hi
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004977.html
I have the same problem to discuss as in the above link. I want to allocate
say X MBit per individual connection regardless of the number of
connection . KIndly could
Hi,I try to configure 3 HTB class with a rate near to zero and the ceil equal to the max of the bandwith. And I put prio parameter for each class.In this configuration, HTB is equivalent with Weighted Round Robin algorithm.
Is it more correct to put the good rate for each class or to play with the
Hi all !
I'm building a network appliance whose goals are to enhance Voip
quality on 512/128k DSL links. But, i have a voice quality problem,
and i think i'm doing something wrong, but i can't find what. Please
excuse my terrible english, i'm french.
From what i've read, tc is the tool i need.
d3xcrIpt wrote:
Help me ...
I try use the tc filter, but seems he doesn't work, I already
reconfigured my kernel ( 2.4.32 ) with all options related a QOS
enabled ( like modules ) and nothing happens. I get the tc tool from
HTB source package, well this is my set :
eth0 is my
Help me ...
I try use the tc filter, but seems he doesn't work, I already
reconfigured my kernel ( 2.4.32 ) with all options related a QOS
enabled ( like modules ) and nothing happens. I get the tc tool from
HTB source package, well this is my set :
eth0 is my internal NIC.
tc qdisc add
Hello.
I have a linux server connected to a gigabit lan, and though that lan to a
768kbps/768kbps DSL modem.
I'm trying to shape my webserver running on port 80/443 down to 512kbps,
while leaving all other ports alone. The current configuration script that
I'm using is as follows:
tc qdisc
Mallorca - BalearesTel.: +34 971 448030Fax.: +34 971 436986Bugzilla-Redirect [EMAIL PROTECTED]Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]08/09/2006 10:02Paralartc@mailman.ds9a.nlccAsunto[LARTC] htb traffic shaping problemHello.I have a linux server connected to a gigabit lan, and though that lan to
a 768kbps/768kbps
7:40 AM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb traffic
shaping problem
Good afternoon,
your
configuration seems correct to me. Could you send us the output of tc -s
-d class show dev eth0 during your probes?
What
kernel and tc versions are you using?
Regards,
Eric
Janz
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 02:27, Adorean Alexandru Raul wrote:
I have a router with about 300 clients connecting to it. It has htb with
a class per client.
I wnat to create a script to prioritise www trafic and ssh trafic over
p2p trafic
this is a sample of what i have now:
/sbin/tc
I have a router with about 300 clients connecting to it. It has htb with
a class per client.
I wnat to create a script to prioritise www trafic and ssh trafic over
p2p trafic
this is a sample of what i have now:
/sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:5 classid 1:8012 htb rate 35Kbit
Hi!
Is it HTB fully compatible with BOND interface?
I have this setup (mode= fault tolerance) :
BOND0 - ETH0 + ETH1
BOND1 - ETH2 + ETH3
(
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/marcelo/linux-2.4/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt
)
HTB work very well with Class over BOND0.
If I add
I believe there are some unresolved memory management issues with HTB.
It looks like deleting the qdisc is causing some use after free or
memory corruption problems.
See:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6681
I don't use HTB so I have no idea if this a new or old problem.
Stefano Mainardi wrote:
tc class add dev eth1 parent 11:1 classid 11:2 htb rate 70Mbit ceil 70Mbit
burst 6k cburst 64k quantum 1600
I am not sure if it matters in this case with the big cburst - but
remember burst * 8 * HZ will be the bit rate a class can reach.
Andy.
Hi Andy,how i must setup the value for CBURST for my situation? Have you read?Ste2006/6/1, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:Stefano Mainardi wrote: tc class add dev eth1 parent 11:1 classid 11:2 htb rate 70Mbit ceil 70Mbit
burst 6k cburst 64k quantum 1600I am not sure if it matters in this case
Stefano Mainardi wrote:
Hi Andy,
how i must setup the value for CBURST for my situation? Have you read?
I think the burst is too small - In your case I would just not specify
either burst and let htb choose them.
Andy.
Ste
2006/6/1, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stefano Mainardi
Ok, i try without CBURST value.Thanks ;)2006/6/1, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stefano Mainardi wrote: Hi Andy, how i must setup the value for CBURST for my situation? Have you read?I think the burst is too small - In your case I would just not specifyeither burst and let htb choose them.
Andy.
Stefano Mainardi wrote:
Ok, i try without CBURST value.
Without burst aswell ...
Andy.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Ops BURST...sorry!And CBURST value you think that is correct?2006/6/1, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stefano Mainardi wrote: Ok, i try without CBURST value.Without burst aswell ...
Andy.-- Stefano MainardiPresidente Associazione ILDN - Italian Linux Distro NetworkMobile: 349/3917212Skype:
Stefano Mainardi wrote:
Ops BURST...sorry!
And CBURST value you think that is correct?
I would leave that out aswell and let htb choose it from the rate of the
class.
Andy.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
Andreas,if I want that A,B,C can borrow bandwidth from each other? How i can the structure of HTB tree?Stefano2006/5/28, Andreas Klauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:04:57AM +0200, Stefano Mainardi wrote:
Like I said above, in the case that B is not producing traffic, 7/8 of the
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:28:12PM +0200, Stefano Mainardi wrote:
The goal is to divide the traffic for classes of workstations, at example in
three classes, let say A, B and C.
Sounds simple enough...
If B don't make traffic, 7/8 of 20Mb/s must be assigned to A and all the
rest at B
Why
2006/5/27, Andreas Klauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If B don't make traffic, 7/8 of 20Mb/s must be assigned to A and all the rest at BWhy would you assign traffic at B if it doesn't make traffic?Sorry, all the rest at A :)
Post your HTB script and I (and probably others) will have a look at it.
This
2006/5/28, Andreas Klauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So, in other words, A is allowed to take bandwidth from B.B and C stick to their bandwidth limits.There is a misunderstanding, sorry.I need to know if it is possible to manage in a dynamic way the assignment of traffic to workstations and of the traffic
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:04:57AM +0200, Stefano Mainardi wrote:
Like I said above, in the case that B is not producing traffic, 7/8 of the
20 MB/s need to be assigned to A and the remaining 1/8 will remain to B.
Well, reducing the ceil of A by 1/8 of B's bandwidth in the tree I
posted
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Larry Brigman wrote:
On 5/14/06, Jesper Dangaard Brouer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Muthukumar S wrote:
cut
Also I was wondering what limits (if any) the kernel timer resolution
imposes on HTB.
cut
The kernel timer resolution does have an impact on
Muthukumar S wrote:
Iperf has a demonstrated behavior that when running more than one copy
at the
same time on the same box (client side); that the timing of each will
start to effect
the other copies. This is a function of how Iperf does it's timing
(spin loops).
What traffic generators
On 5/14/06, Jesper Dangaard Brouer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Muthukumar S wrote:
cut
Also I was wondering what limits (if any) the kernel timer resolution
imposes on HTB.
cut
The kernel timer resolution does have an impact on the precision of HTB
(the delay jitter).
I
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Muthukumar S wrote:
cut
Also I was wondering what limits (if any) the kernel timer resolution
imposes on HTB.
cut
The kernel timer resolution does have an impact on the precision of HTB
(the delay jitter).
I have done some detailed studies in my master thesis. Which
I'll try using 450 K and setting a higher ceil to see how it works.
Also I was wondering what limits (if any) the kernel timer resolution
imposes on HTB.
Thanks!
Muthu
On 5/11/06, Jody Shumaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/10/06, Muthukumar S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First up, thanks for the
1 - 100 of 1020 matches
Mail list logo
