After starting to shape local traffic now i am getting a lot of kernel
panics in tcp_retransmit, so i decided to update my kernel from
2.6.17.14 to 2.6.21.1 , the problem is that after that i get:
# iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j IMQ --todev 0
iptables: No chain/target/match by that
Nikolay Nikolaev wrote:
Hi.
-j IMQ is equal -j ACCEPT...? i mean it after -j IMQ packet don't return
in parent chain??? cause -j ACCEPT action accept the packet in the child
chain and don't return it to parent...
example:
ipt="iptables -t mangle"
$ipt -N HTTP
$ipt -A HTTP -j IMQ // after thi
Hi.
-j IMQ is equal -j ACCEPT...? i mean it after -j IMQ packet don't return
in parent chain??? cause -j ACCEPT action accept the packet in the child
chain and don't return it to parent...
example:
ipt="iptables -t mangle"
$ipt -N HTTP
$ipt -A HTTP -j IMQ // after this packet packets go to -t
Jonas Jasas wrote:
Hello,
I have
eth0 - internet
eth1..4 - local networks
on eth0 i do $IPTABLES -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
I want to balance out/in load for eth1..4 and localhost (mainly
squid). Nat makes impossible to do it on eth0, so I installed IMQ. I
need to get to on imq
Hello,
I have
eth0 - internet
eth1..4 - local networks
on eth0 i do $IPTABLES -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
I want to balance out/in load for eth1..4 and localhost (mainly
squid). Nat makes impossible to do it on eth0, so I installed IMQ. I
need to get to on imq0 unnnated in/out tr
Hi All,Please to advice me. I become crazy
because i cannot find where can be problem. Obviously i miss
something, but what ?I have Linux router for traffic
control / ~400 users , 100 mbit bandwidth / . evereting was great
until i try to implement IMQ for ingress shaping. P
gypsy wrote:
>
> I am attempting to implement IMQ on a 2.4.31 version kernel with
> iptables 1.3.3.
>
> I am following the example at http://www.linuximq.net/usage.html. When
> I enter the line
> iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j IMQ --todev1
>
> (eth1 is the external interface), the
I am attempting to implement IMQ on a 2.4.31 version kernel with
iptables 1.3.3.
I am following the example at http://www.linuximq.net/usage.html. When
I enter the line
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j IMQ --todev1
(eth1 is the external interface), the computer slows to a crawl. OK,
Hi, I'm working on the IMQ patch for 2.6.14-rc* and ran in trouble with
nfcache. I have to be honest that I'm not following kernel devel as I
should so I need to ask for a little help here. I know Mr Harald Welte
removed nfcache but I'm not sure about the way to go. I have this at
net/ipv4/ne
Andy Furniss wrote:
choros wrote:
tc filter add dev imq0 parent 10:2 protocol ip prio 1 handle 3 fw
classid 10:23
The filters need to be on the root - 10: or you need another filter
on 10: to filter the packets to 10:2.
Andy.
thanks for your help . I did what you say and everything s
choros wrote:
tc filter add dev imq0 parent 10:2 protocol ip prio 1 handle 3 fw
classid 10:23
The filters need to be on the root - 10: or you need another filter on
10: to filter the packets to 10:2.
Andy.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9
Hi, i am running imq + htb on my router , the situation is like this
eth0 = uplink to my provider
eth1 = 1st customer
eth2 = 2nd customer
eth3 = 3th customer
eth0 has limit 512 and i want to share this between eth1 eth2 and eth3 ,
but not working , this is the script i used,
\\
I made some changes to IMQ, so it is now possible to have custom numbers for
IMQ devices. Useful when working with VLANs. You can get it at
http://tuxpowered.net/. Readme is on the website.
--
| pozdrawiam / greetings | powered by Trustix, Gentoo and FreeBSD |
| Kajetan Staszkiewicz | JID: [
>> no i want match their private addresses.
>> i want imq0 for ext_if and imq1 for internal_if..
>>
>> so i can traffic shaping on matched NATed ips
>
> Oh ok. I was irritated because you say NATed ips - for me this are all
> clients
> after the passed the nat table...
>
> So you ned BB. IMQ hook
> no i want match their private addresses.
> i want imq0 for ext_if and imq1 for internal_if..
>
> so i can traffic shaping on matched NATed ips
Oh ok. I was irritated because you say NATed ips - for me this are all clients
after the passed the nat table...
So you ned BB. IMQ hook before the post
>> i want to shape traffic for my clients and do not know what behaviour to
>> choose...
>> in your example will it be possible to match NATed addresses of my
>> clients ?
>
> you want to match the translated addresses of your clients (-> external
> IP) -
> then BA is the correct behaviour.
>
no
> i want to shape traffic for my clients and do not know what behaviour to
> choose...
> in your example will it be possible to match NATed addresses of my clients ?
you want to match the translated addresses of your clients (-> external IP) -
then BA is the correct behaviour.
___
>> yes but i want to have two IMQ devices... for outside eth and inside eth
>
> Ahmm.. don't know what you mean with that. But if you have a external
> Interface (ex eth0) on which you want to shape egress and also ingress
> shaping
> you simply do:
>
> ip link set imq0 up
> ip link set imq1 up
>
> yes but i want to have two IMQ devices... for outside eth and inside eth
Ahmm.. don't know what you mean with that. But if you have a external
Interface (ex eth0) on which you want to shape egress and also ingress shaping
you simply do:
ip link set imq0 up
ip link set imq1 up
${IPTABLES} -t ma
> Dariusz Dwornikowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) schrieb:
>> I want to use imq on ROUTER, what behaviour to choose ? AA, BA, AB, BB
>> ??
>
> That depends on what you want to do. For example:
>
> *) BA - If you want to have all packets on the IMQ after the nat table -
> so
> you wouldn't see any interna
Dariusz Dwornikowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) schrieb:
> I want to use imq on ROUTER, what behaviour to choose ? AA, BA, AB, BB ??
That depends on what you want to do. For example:
*) BA - If you want to have all packets on the IMQ after the nat table - so
you wouldn't see any internal ips anymore on
ive got such network:
|| |-|
| WORLD |---|ROUTER/server| -- NATED LAN
|| |-|
I want to use imq on ROUTER, what behaviour to choose ? AA, BA, AB, BB ??
--
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a
s.az wrote:
I want to shape the incoming traffic ( download ) "but using only
fwmark", i know there are other methods, but i want to use this one
particularly...
So, first i create DOWNLOAD and mark with 20 all the traffic with
destination 10.0.0.3 ( eth1 ) incoming from my internet device (
I want to shape the incoming traffic ( download ) "but using only
fwmark", i know there are other methods, but i want to use this one
particularly...
So, first i create DOWNLOAD and mark with 20 all the traffic with
destination 10.0.0.3 ( eth1 ) incoming from my internet device ( eth0 ).
#$
In 2.6 kernel series, the IMQ patch allow you to change this behaviour.
For 2.4 kernels I had seen (some time ago) something about it in IMQ
faqs or there.
You can changhe this behaviour, but I don't remember now if for 2.4
kernels were changing some #define in any .c or .h file.
Best regards
J
Hi!
I would like to thank very much for this great page with Kernel Packet
Traveling Diagram and to suggest small update concerning IMQ.
I think the sentence:
"IMQ in input comes before nat so IMQ does not know the real ip address.
Ingress comes after nat, so ingress knows the real ip address."
OK, i've got the ideea.
In conclusion if i have a simple:
LAN --- router --- WAN
i don't need IMQ stuff :)
thanks
bye
--
Radu Cugut
mobile: +40 742 045686
web:http://rcugut.has.it
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailma
2005 11:14 AM
Subject: [LARTC] IMQ: why do I need IMQ ?
Hello there,
Can someone please explain why do one neeed IMQ ?
I can already shape incoming traffic on my nat router by creating
qdiscs on LAN-side interface. I have done some tests, whith simple
bandwidth limmiting, and it works.
I've rea
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:14:22PM +0300, Radu CUGUT wrote:
> Hello there,
hi
> Can someone please explain why do one neeed IMQ ?
- if you want to shape incoming traffic
- if you want to bundle devices
> I can already shape incoming traffic on my nat router by creating qdiscs on
> LAN-side interf
Hello there,
Can someone please explain why do one neeed IMQ ?
I can already shape incoming traffic on my nat router by creating
qdiscs on LAN-side interface. I have done some tests, whith simple
bandwidth limmiting, and it works.
I've read just about all the stuff on www.linuximq.net ... but
co
Hi,
I would like to ask whether there is support for the
interface imq in the tcng language thats used for easy
traffic control configuration instead of the tc
command line tool.
eg: dev imq0{
egress{}
}
Thanx and kind regards
vinay
__
Hi,
I would like to shape incomming traffic on eth0 and ipsec0 (binded to eth0).
I need to set minimal bandwidth to some packets going via ipsec0
interface.
It is running fine when I simply mark the ESP (protocol 50) packets in the
PREROUTING chain - means all ipsec packets are shaped.
Like:
ipta
Hi Zytek..
I have already read the lartc :)
Umm but atlast i have to put parent to 100.
I was thinking to implement in other way but now i have only to the
solution to put parent to 100kbps.
anyway thanks,
joel
But what I have done
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 20:06, zytek wrote:
> Dnia piÄtek 10
Dnia piątek 10 wrzesień 2004 05:22, Joel n.solanki napisał:
> Hello Andre...
> this is the scenario
>
> My linux router is connected to 1 Mbps leased line. Out of which i only
> want to use 100 kbps for my broadband clients.
>
>
>
> Linux router(100 kbps class 1:101(40kbps) class 1:102(40kbps
Hello Andre...
this is the scenario
My linux router is connected to 1 Mbps leased line. Out of which i only
want to use 100 kbps for my broadband clients.
Linux router(100 kbps class 1:101(40kbps) class 1:102(40kbps)
class 1:103(50kbps)
Hi Joel, you didn't told us details about your scenario or special needs
but to me you don't look like a candidate for IMQ. It is ment to be
used when you need to set global defaults or when you need to use egress
filter features on ingress traffic.
Based in your message I supose that a qdisc
Dear all,
I know this is not imq mailing list. But many of the users over here
have done exactly what i want.
Requirement:- I want to tight bound eth1 for 100 kbps
but after i want to create many classes of 64 kbps or 50 kbps and
others. But the total sum of classes is more than 100 kbps so my et
Hi Bety, a problem like this was reported on IMQ mailling list a couple
of weeks ago. It is still pending review but it must be somehow related
to iptraf. :-|
I'm sorry for not being able to give you some "positive" advice on it
for now.
Tks for reporting this issue. If you need assistance f
hello list,
i have a small question regarding the imq patch from www.linuximq.net
by default it makes only 2 devices. how can i add interfaces (imqX)?
applying the patch to a linux kernel doesn't let me build it as a module.
thanks in advance,
adrian
_
ugust 23, 2004 6:45
AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] imq question
You cant shape router upload or imq will
crash.
also that imq will not be able to shape traffic
per each loacal ip with filters, but you can easily mark packets with
iptables in forward of prerouting
Does anybody have the following problem?
Affected:
IMQ interfaces with --todev target on PREROUTING chain
appear only on 2.6.x kernels (2.4.x working good)
Counters on PREROUTING chain working good (with iptraf sniffing on any
interface), but imq interfaces lost TCP packets which are forwarded f
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:32
AM
Subject: [LARTC] imq question
Hi
I've a stupid question. How can I shape upload
using IMQ?
Instead of putting a rule in iptables in
PREROUTING should i use POSTROUTING?
And another question is, can I make routing rule
bas
Hi
I've a stupid question. How can I shape upload
using IMQ?
Instead of putting a rule in iptables in PREROUTING
should i use POSTROUTING?
And another question is, can I make routing rule
based on ip addresses assigned by iptables to an imq device?The idea is,
let's say i have some rules i
hello all,
i intend to impliment Jiri Fojtasek's imq implimentation here http://hyperfighter.jinak.cz/qos/ on my Linux shaper for production use,I will like to ask if people have implimented it and find it stable and useful as stated in the site.
My bandwidth manager will have 3 interfaces ,
Am Sonntag, 8. August 2004 18:41 schrieb Stefanos Harhalakis:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to contact imq maintainers but there is no contact address in
> www.linuximq.net. There is only a yahoo group but I don't have a yahoo
> account and it seems it doesn't like me a lot (it refused to create a n
Hi there,
I'm trying to contact imq maintainers but there is no contact address in
www.linuximq.net. There is only a yahoo group but I don't have a yahoo
account and it seems it doesn't like me a lot (it refused to create a new
account).
Anyone knows an email address for any IMQ developer?
Mihai, there is no need to make it like that:
qdisc->class->qdisc->client_classes ... this is just an example, not
something that have to be followed.
A possible use for a setup like that would be to have another qdisc
child from 1:1 using CBQ for example, not HTB, and then child classes to
at
Hello,
I've just recently started to use IMQ and I got puzzled after seeing the
imq usage example on the linuximq.net site:
It was something like this:
tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1mbit
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 ha
In fact we've being discussing lately at linuximq.net mailling list this
subject and what would be the best way to enable this "behavior" change
"automatically".
There is no problem on changing where IMQ hooks, after or before NAT for
example, not that we found until now.
The matter is what sh
Hello there!
I was reading this archive:
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html
It was almost two years ago when Patrick wrote a patch to switch IMQ
with nat in PREROUTING chain...
From www.linuximq.org I've downloaded newset IMQ driver for 2.4.26 and
what can i see? The line
Hi Damion, the original IMQ implementation is under development by a
group of people working at www.linuximq.net . There you'll find patchs
for the lastest kernels and iptables, a simple FAQ and a mailling list.
IMQ is being used by a lot of people in diferent environments. Some of
then, like m
Hi,
I've never actually even tried to use the IMQ device before,
but I've watched the emails go back and forth on various problems associated with it,
and what looks like some general instability.
How stable is it really ? Is it suitable for full-time use on a large number of
routers ?
Has anyo
Hi Andres, I'm sorry for not being able to contact you before but this
week was full of new problems. Regarding IMQ compilation I would like to
point you to our web site where you can get new patchs, find a quick
updated FAQ and our mailling list.
http://www.linuximq.net/
There we have all the
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to compile IMQ with kernel-2.4.26 and iptables-1.2.9
and I want to know is this procedure is correct:
- In Kernel 2.4.26 Directory (/usr/src/linux)
# cd /usr/src/linux
# wget http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.4.2
El lun, 05-04-2004 a las 17:58, Andre Correa escribió:
> Hi Joan, can you please tell us what version of kernel and iptables are
> you using?
Kernel -> 2.6.3
Iptables -> 1.2.9
> Are you using Patrick McHardy's / www.linuximq.net original IMQ
> implementation?
I can't apply imq-nat patch to the
Hi Joan, can you please tell us what version of kernel and iptables are
you using?
Are you using Patrick McHardy's / www.linuximq.net original IMQ
implementation?
tks
Andre Correa
www.linuximq.net
Joan Fuster Monzó wrote:
Hi all, my IMQ device works OK (thanks to Andy Furniss), but now I've
Hi all, my IMQ device works OK (thanks to Andy Furniss), but now I've
problems to attach the traffic in the qdisc's. This is my conf:
---
INET
|
|eth0 300Kbps
ROUTER (NAT)
|eth1
|
LAN
-
Cord Buhlert wrote:
Hi,
i tried to insmod the imq.o module from http://pupa.da.ru/imq after a
successful compile, but it thows this error:
> insmod imq.o
imq.o: unresolved symbol nf_unregister_hook
imq.o: unresolved symbol nf_register_hook
I think I have some kernel options disabled, does a
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: [LARTC] IMQ driver & kernel options
> Hi,
> i tried to insmod the imq.o module from http://pupa.da.ru/imq after a
> successful compile, but it thows this error:
>
> > insmod imq.o
&g
Hi,
i tried to insmod the imq.o module from http://pupa.da.ru/imq after a
successful compile, but it thows this error:
> insmod imq.o
imq.o: unresolved symbol nf_unregister_hook
imq.o: unresolved symbol nf_register_hook
I think I have some kernel options disabled, does anyone know which
one
Hello all
I have done next version of my IMQ implementation:
Fixed bug with spinlock in dev_queue_xmit()
Addet experimental support for ingress queue (just only IPV4)
Addet some comments to the sources
Fixed example in README + new example for ingress
The kernel patch for 2.4.25 was
Andy Furniss wrote:
Joan Fuster Monzó wrote:
Hi all, I found in http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/index.html#sources the
precompiled iptables shared libs for 1.2.6 & 1.2.5, but my version is
1.2.9 (in Debian Sid) and I don't know how to patch the .deb file. I
need the -j IMQ target... ¿What can I do?
Th
Joan Fuster Monzó wrote:
Hi all, I found in http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/index.html#sources the
precompiled iptables shared libs for 1.2.6 & 1.2.5, but my version is
1.2.9 (in Debian Sid) and I don't know how to patch the .deb file. I
need the -j IMQ target... ¿What can I do?
Thanks!
There are some
go to www.linuximq.net at first,
this is newer than that forgoten page
or you can use my imq version from http://pupa.da.ru/imq
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi all, I found in http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/index.html#sources the
precompiled iptables shared libs for 1.2.6 & 1.2.5, but my version is
1.2.9 (in Debian Sid) and I don't know how to patch the .deb file. I
need the -j IMQ target... ¿What can I do?
Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte
I encountered errors with linux-2.6.2-imq-4.diff even if I marked both
options as modules or not. But linux-2.6.4-rc2-imq-5.patch seems to be
quite stable until now.
Codrin.
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Andre Correa wrote:
>
> Sorry, but the patch is not broken. It compiles without errors. You just
On Friday 05 March 2004 16:12, Andre Correa wrote:
Hi Andre,
> Sorry, but the patch is not broken. It compiles without errors. You just
> have to choose the right options in your config:
> CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_IMQ=y
> and
> CONFIG_IMQ=y
> and avoid using modules.
which is, in short words, broken
Sorry, but the patch is not broken. It compiles without errors. You just
have to choose the right options in your config:
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_IMQ=y
and
CONFIG_IMQ=y
and avoid using modules.
Andre
Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
On Friday 05 March 2004 00:00, The Codrinus wrote:
Hi Codrin,
I d
Marc,
I've just upgraded my kernel to 2.6.3 with the IMQ patch and it seems to
be fine until now.
Thanks alot,
Codrin.
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2004 00:00, The Codrinus wrote:
>
> Hi Codrin,
>
> > I downloaded the latest imq patch for 2.6.x kern
On Friday 05 March 2004 00:00, The Codrinus wrote:
Hi Codrin,
> I downloaded the latest imq patch for 2.6.x kernels from
> http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.6.2-imq-4.diff
> I successfully applied the patch but when compiling IMQ I get the
> following error messages:
> What might be the prob
Hi,
I downloaded the latest imq patch for 2.6.x kernels from
http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.6.2-imq-4.diff
I successfully applied the patch but when compiling IMQ I get the
following error messages:
CC net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_IMQ.o
net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_IMQ.c: In function `imq_ta
: "Patrick Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: [LARTC] imq or ingress+htb?
> Todays quick question:
>
> Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im
> thinking that a better solution
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 18:33, Patrick Petersen wrote:
> Todays quick question:
>
> Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im
> thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to
> put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with in
Todays quick question:
Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im
thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to
put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with ingress,
and the shape traffic on the inner interface with htb. Wou
Andre,
thanks for doing this. I also felt like I need to say something for
some time. Roy, you should also stop telling people your version would
be "more stable". IMQ's problems are related to specific setups, so I
don't understand how you can state this without even understanding the
problem. Evi
> Hi, I'm sorry for not being able to be really polite this time, but:
>
> Roy, can you please STOP telling that egress crashs IMQ!?
You are to late, I anot teling thi anymore, and I even wont use
ingres and egress definitions anymore because they may cause
missundersatndings.
the better ones are
Hi, I'm sorry for not being able to be really polite this time, but:
Roy, can you please STOP telling that egress crashs IMQ!?
We've discussed it lots of times before, here and at linuximq mailling
list and the only known functionality that crashs IMQ (oriinal) is to
touch local generated traff
>> Roy,
>> '"'But this stability is probably not because my code is better but
because
>> I don't use egress shaping so the crash reasons still unknown.'"'
>>
>I need both ingress and egress traffic shaping, that's why I used the
>classic IMQ version.
Egress shaping will crash original wersion
Roy,
"But this stability is probably not because my code is better but because
I don't use egress shaping so the crash reasons still unknown."
I need both ingress and egress traffic shaping, that's why I used the
classic IMQ version.
> You can try my imq version, which dows not require pach
You can try my imq version, which dows not require paching anything
http://pupa.da.ru/imq
and I think it should be more stable.
- Original Message -
From: "The Codrinus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 6:19 PM
Subj
> On Thursday 19 February 2004 17:19, The Codrinus wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have successfully applied the IMQ patch for kernel-2.6.2 (final
> > release) from http://www.linuximq.net, and now I have support for 4 IMQ
> > devices loaded in kernel. But I don't know how to patch the iptables-1.2.9
> > to
On Thursday 19 February 2004 17:19, The Codrinus wrote:
> Hi,
> I have successfully applied the IMQ patch for kernel-2.6.2 (final
> release) from http://www.linuximq.net, and now I have support for 4 IMQ
> devices loaded in kernel. But I don't know how to patch the iptables-1.2.9
> to support the -
Hi,
I have successfully applied the IMQ patch for kernel-2.6.2 (final
release) from http://www.linuximq.net, and now I have support for 4 IMQ
devices loaded in kernel. But I don't know how to patch the iptables-1.2.9
to support the -j IMQ target. I tried the patch-o-matic for 2.4.x kernels,
but i
Hi,
has anyone IMQ device running on an ISDN line for incoming shaping? I
tried to but everytime a packet gets from the ippp0 to imq0 the kernel
crashes.
Does this work somewhere?
thx 4 help
cord
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman
Hi,
I've patched 2.4.24 with IMQ successfully !!
thank you
Andres
-> -Mensaje original-
-> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> nombre de Andre Correa
-> Enviado el: Martes, 03 de Febrero de 2004 09:56 a.m.
-> Para: ThE LinuX_KiD
-> CC: lartc
-&g
Hi Andres, there is a patch for 2.4.24 available at www.linuximq.net ...
have a try on it and please let us know if you have any trouble using it.
tks
Andre
ThE LinuX_KiD wrote:
Hello
I'm trying the excelent IMQ patch for
iptbles and kernel 2.4.21 and works
very well...
but, there is a IMQ p
Hello
I'm trying the excelent IMQ patch for
iptbles and kernel 2.4.21 and works
very well...
but, there is a IMQ patch for 2.4.24 ?
I've tested IMQ for kernels > 2,4,21 but
patch fails !
Best regards
andres
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi all, i have tried out both IMQ and shaping transmit on 2 NICS downstream and
upstream respectively, which method is preferred in terms of accuracy,
stability etc
pls advise
tc
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:29:13AM -0700, Michael S. Kazmier wrote:
MSK>Hello all,
MSK>I have been doing a lot of archive searching over the last week reading
MSK>posts on IMQ and it's apparent stability / instability. I have seen a
MSK>number of posts about it not being maintained as well. Can
On Jan 26, Michael S. Kazmier wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> Perhaps I missed something below which ties eth0 and eth1 to the PPP pipe,
> or its just my unfamiliarity with PPP.
>
sorry I should of made it cleaner. If you read up on Advanced Routing HOWTO,
its hopefully easy to understand.
lets say:
> the new imq driver that i am developing will have unlimited posibilities
> it willbe fake interface wich passes all ip trafic without exception no
> mater which direction, destination and so on
> even localy generated and received trafic should pass it
May I suggest that if it's new code with
?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alexander Clouter
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 7:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ Stability
On Jan 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you for the detailed discussion. There is no doubt t
OTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 1:33 AM
Subject: [LARTC] IMQ Runtime error
hi all, i have applied all patches and compiled the kernel
(2.4.21), iptables
(1.2.9) and iproute2 (2.4.7-now-ss020116) however when i run '"'modprobe
imq
numdevs=1
Hi Roy,
Excelent Roy!!!
Good job.
Where we can get your IMQ port to test?
Best Regards
Remus
- Original Message -
From: "Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 3:49 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ Stability
>
nuary 26, 2004 1:33 AM
Subject: [LARTC] IMQ Runtime error
> hi all, i have applied all patches and compiled the kernel
> (2.4.21), iptables
> (1.2.9) and iproute2 (2.4.7-now-ss020116) however when i run '"'modprobe
imq
> numdevs=1'"', the system returns - imq.o:
hi all, i have applied all patches and compiled the kernel (2.4.21), iptables
(1.2.9) and iproute2 (2.4.7-now-ss020116) however when i run "modprobe imq
numdevs=1", the system returns - imq.o: init_module: Device or resource busy
the transcript is below -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] project]# modprobe imq
).
Your efforts are highly appreciated!
Aron
---
From: "Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ Stability
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 05:49:15
Internet (eth0) <-> ppp0 - ppp1 <-> LAN (eth1) 10.0.0.0/8
this way dont seem excelent because it still lacks some functionality
and what about using LO or dummy type interface instead of ppp?
the new imq driver that i am developing will have unlimited posibilities
it willbe fake interface w
On Jan 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you for the detailed discussion. There is no doubt that there is a
> need for an IMQ type device/funtionality. What would work really great,
> IMHO, is a "fake" or psuedo ethernet driver that simply sits as a shim
> between one or more real drivers. Th
lo interface) but not very good.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael S. Kazmier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 7:29 PM
Subject: [LARTC] IMQ Stability
> Hello all,
>
> I have been doing a lot of archive searc
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
