> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael S. Kazmier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 7:29 PM
> Subject: [LARTC] IMQ Stability
>
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have been doing a lot of arch
Hello all,
I have been doing a lot of archive searching over the last week reading
posts on IMQ and it's apparent stability / instability. I have seen a
number of posts about it not being maintained as well. Can anyone talk to
me about IMQ's stability in a heavy throughput environment (20 Mbps)
Hi,
is there an IMQ-patch available for kernel version 2.4.24?
If so, where can I get it?
greetz
cord
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Sunday 04 January 2004 5:33 pm, Roy wrote:
> > I have read about people having lots of problems with IMQ. So I just
>
> wanted to
>
> > try it and see how stable it is on my box. I gather it could actually
> > be problems with the Kernel and not the IMQ code??
>
> That is possible but prpbably
> I have read about people having lots of problems with IMQ. So I just
wanted to
> try it and see how stable it is on my box. I gather it could actually
> be problems with the Kernel and not the IMQ code??
>
That is possible but prpbably not because of bug in kernel I
as I think it is because kern
Hi Roy,
Thanks for getting back to me so promptly.
> Imq is very invasive componemt which requires to recompile almost everyhing
> this diver is very unstable and will crash for sure, sooner or later
> depending on load.
I have read about people having lots of problems with IMQ. So I just wante
Imq is very invasive componemt which requires to recompile almost everyhing
this diver is very unstable and will crash for sure, sooner or later
depending on load.
I sugest you to leave iptables alone and just modify imq.c source to catch
what you need.
ir you dont have too much trafic it may not
Hi
I have built a custom TMB Mandrake kernel (2.4.22) with IMQ and ESFQ
support. I statically compiled both (mistake?) ESFQ is sorted and
working fine (I have succesfully patched IPROUTE2).
I have got to the stage where I can see the IMQ device as UP with ifconfig.
I can use TC to add QDISCs to t
> > so I suspect that there is problem with shaper itself or netfilter, or
linux
> > dont like when packets are reordered.
> This could be. BTW, today experimenting I got a crash, which says this
> is kernel bug, file skbuff.c, line 92.
How do you get C code error line?
I can only get function
Roy wrote:
Now I am continuing imq development, but seems it is hopeless, no mater what
i do it crashes when qdisc are used
seems that it can be not imq problem but somthing wrong with htb.
Nope. I've tryed other qdiscs, classful/classless -- the same.
..skip..
As you see it is so simple that the
Now I am continuing imq development, but seems it is hopeless, no mater what
i do it crashes when qdisc are used
seems that it can be not imq problem but somthing wrong with htb.
I completely rewrote imq driver, only device registration left. I checked
many diferent variants of code, and no mater w
Hello.
As you know Patrick McHardy stopped to support IMQ. As for now, this
stuff has an annoying problem and I've made a little investigation of
it. So, maybe it will be useful for someone.
First, pass all traffic of the interface (as in, as out) though imq
device. Something like:
iptables -
Hi,
I decided to continue imq development since it is
not much usable as is now.
I am going to make imq the only place for all
trafic shaping.
But there is one problem that this driver is very
unstable by some reason it crashes randomly under high load when dropping many
packets.
and what
Hi!
For the past months, my home nat-router has been acting up, locking
random ports on the quad port ethernet NIC after 3-6 hours of use. After
lots of lots of eliminating and debugging of modules, I have circled in
on the IMQ-modules.
So, IMQ locks up my ethernet ports. I'm running a quad D-Lin
Hi all :)
I'm searching doc about IMQ, but I don't find good info.
Is http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/ the IMQ web page? exists others ??
Any webpage about QoS are welcome.
thx, sorry 4 muy English
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds
Hi,
I am sorry for sending mail in html format :(
I have applied the IMQ patch to 2.4.21 kernel.
But, I don't see IMQ target(s) net Kernel -> Networking_options ->
IP:Netfilter_Configuration.
I don't know what I am missing?
Venkatesh K
___
LARTC mai
Hi,
I have applied the IMQ patch to 2.4.21 kernel.
But, I don't see IMQ target(s) net Kerne ->
Networking_options -> IP:Netfilter_Configuration.
I don't know what I am missing?
Venkatesh K
Hi,
please avoid using "reply to" on a message when you want to start a new
thread. This is annoying when you use a thread view of mails.
Thank you. :-)
--
Jeremie LE HEN aka TtZ/TataZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[E
Hi folks
I'm just writing about the same, sorry. :-)
Does anybody have chenge IMQ sourec code to patch 2.6 kernel?
I know somebody did it, because I asked Patrick McHardy about patch
and he told he got it from a few users but he is not at home yet (maybe
holiday, business trip or whatever).
and
apply fine-tuned ingress/egress control to a
host/subnet. I want to say thanks to everyone to gave me great pointers and
help on this.
Walt
- Original Message -
From: "David Boreham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25,
>> 2) Why the sarcasm about not wanting to recompile the kernel? I love
>> using Linux, and I have recompiled kernels before. However, in this
>> application it may not be my best choice. You do not know my
>> situation. I tried recompiling the kernel on this machine and had
much
>> trouble wit
> 1) Why is RH a bad choice?
It's not necessarily bad, for example they can sell you
good commercial support, and most commercial binary-only
applications will only support RH kernels (e.g. Clearcase).
However, RH tends to have their own ideas about a bunch of
stuff which doesn't always match the
On Thursday 25 September 2003 21:51, Walter D. Wyndroski wrote:
> 1) Why is RH a bad choice?
I think RH changes too much. If you you have a RH apache server and you want
support from the apache community, you are out of luck. The RH apache server
is so much patched that can't help you. And apt
OTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ Install Without Recompiling Kernel?
> > I'm really needing the ability to ingress and egress on a subnet,
actually
> > multiple subnets. Primarily I need to ratelimit said subnet no mater
which
>
Thank you. I had not thought of that route. I will probably go with your
suggestion.
Walt
- Original Message -
From: "David Boreham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ Install With
> I'm really needing the ability to ingress and egress on a subnet, actually
> multiple subnets. Primarily I need to ratelimit said subnet no mater which
> of the nine interfaces (in my router) from which it's traffic is leaving or
> entering the router. However, I still classful queuing using HTB/
> Why don't you take the RH kernel source, apply the imq patch, use the RH
> kernel options and recompile the kernel?
A reasonably painless way to do this is to get the RH kernel RPM source.
Modify the .spec file to add the patches, and rebuild. I've done this in the
past and it tends to result in
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 01:35, Walter D. Wyndroski wrote:
> I mostly figured that. Does anyone on the list have any idea when RH may or
> may not incorporate IMQ into their stock kernel? Mandrake is not an option
> for us as we run RedHat on over ten servers. We are too far entrenched in
> R
available which could assist me until IMQ becomes part of
the RH stock kernel?
Walt
- Original Message -
From: "David Boreham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ Install Without Recompiling Ke
> > If you are willing to use a different distro,
> > then Mandrake 9.1 has a working HTB
> > compiled into its kernel. Just install and shape...
> He wants IMQ, not HTB ...
Oh right, gamma ray hit my brain.
Anyway, that's there too:
# find /lib/modules/2.4.21-0.13mdk/ -name "imq*"
/lib/modules/2
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 21:36, David Boreham wrote:
> > You have to recompile the kernel.
>
> If you are willing to use a different distro,
> then Mandrake 9.1 has a working HTB
> compiled into its kernel. Just install and shape...
He wants IMQ, not HTB ...
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Using
> You have to recompile the kernel.
If you are willing to use a different distro,
then Mandrake 9.1 has a working HTB
compiled into its kernel. Just install and shape...
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo
On Monday 22 September 2003 21:35, Walter D. Wyndroski wrote:
> Is it possible to compile/install IMQ without recompiling the kernel?
>
> Clarification: Is it possible to just compile IMQ into a module much like
> compiling network drivers to work with the current running kernel and then
> just sim
Is it possible to compile/install IMQ without
recompiling the kernel?
Clarification: Is it possible to just compile
IMQ into a module much like compiling network drivers to work with the current
running kernel and then just simply do a modprobe or insmod to insert
it?
I am running RH9.0
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:25:31 +0200
"Thomas Switala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have a system with a monolithic kernel and I am using imq. But now I
> need
> to use more than the default 2 imq devices,
> how can I increase the default to at least 4 with out recompiling a mo
lf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "The Codrinus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ technical question
>
>
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:28:59 +0300 (EEST)
> > The
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:28:59 +0300 (EEST)
The Codrinus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How many IMQ queueing devices you may have ? I've patched the 2.4.21
> kernel and I have by default 2 devices: imq0 and imq1 !
Hello,
use something like modprobe imq numdevs=8 to load imq kernel module or put
On Thursday 11 September 2003 14:28, The Codrinus wrote:
> How many IMQ queueing devices you may have ? I've patched the 2.4.21
> kernel and I have by default 2 devices: imq0 and imq1 !
From
http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/
modprobe imq numdevs=1
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Using Linux as bandwidt
How many IMQ queueing devices you may have ? I've patched the 2.4.21
kernel and I have by default 2 devices: imq0 and imq1 !
regards,
Codrin.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 18:02, Toshiro Viera wrote:
> > > I tried to make IMQ device to work... So I patched the kernel, patched
> > > iptables, made all the stuff, boot to new kernel was ok, module imq was
> > > there and it was ok to load it and 'ip link imq0 up' also worked and
> > > imq0
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 14:05, Rodrigo P. Telles wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I'm using IMQ+HTB in severel NAT Box's, and I never heard to speak about
> that IMQ NAT patch.
> Someone can explain about that patch ?
I can. It makes sure IMQ is afte
> > I tried to make IMQ device to work... So I patched the kernel, patched
> > iptables, made all the stuff, boot to new kernel was ok, module imq was
> > there and it was ok to load it and 'ip link imq0 up' also worked and imq0
> > was present in ifconfig listing. Unitil imq0 was inactive everythi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mike,
I'm using IMQ+HTB in severel NAT Box's, and I never heard to speak about
that IMQ NAT patch.
Someone can explain about that patch ?
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi,
| as I wrote in my last mail I had some troubles with running IMQ
devic
Hi,
as I wrote in my last mail I had some troubles with running IMQ device, because
it caused Kernel panic.
SOLUTION: Of course it was MY mistake, because I forgot to apply IMQ NAT patch..
So if you are trying to run IMQ device on NAT box, don't forget to apply imqnat
patch (http://alfa.tailor.com
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 08:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to make IMQ device to work... So I patched the kernel, patched
> iptables, made all the stuff, boot to new kernel was ok, module imq was
> there and it was ok to load it and 'ip link imq0 up' also worked and imq0
> was pre
Hi,
Not yet, but I will try soon.
Remus
> On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:09, Remus wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I would like to know if IMQ (http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/) is going to
be
> > ported to the 2.6 kernel or there is something else?
> I just took a quick look at the imq patch and
Hi,
I tried to make IMQ device to work... So I patched the kernel, patched iptables,
made all the stuff, boot to new kernel was ok, module imq was there and it was
ok to load it and 'ip link imq0 up' also worked and imq0 was present in ifconfig
listing. Unitil imq0 was inactive everything was clear
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:09, Remus wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to know if IMQ (http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/) is going to be
> ported to the 2.6 kernel or there is something else?
I just took a quick look at the imq patch and I don't think it's difficult to
port it to 2.6. As far
Hi folks,
I would like to know if IMQ (http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/) is going to be
ported to the 2.6 kernel or there is something else?
Thanks
Remus
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:38:26AM -0300, Toshiro Viera wrote:
TV>> Hi,
TV>> does anyone know if IMQ can be installed on linux kernel-2.4.22 ?
TV>> The latest version until now it seems to be IMQ patch against linux 2.4.21
TV>> and when I tried to apply the patch to 2.4.22 I've got some errors.
TV
> Hi,
> does anyone know if IMQ can be installed on linux kernel-2.4.22 ?
> The latest version until now it seems to be IMQ patch against linux 2.4.21
> and when I tried to apply the patch to 2.4.22 I've got some errors.
>
Do you have any succesful experience with IMQ and kernel 2.4.21? I get a
Hi,
does anyone know if IMQ can be installed on linux kernel-2.4.22 ?
The latest version until now it seems to be IMQ patch against linux 2.4.21
and when I tried to apply the patch to 2.4.22 I've got some errors.
regards,
Codrin.
___
LARTC mailing lis
fic Control" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 6:55 PM
Subject: [LARTC] IMQ and fwmark
> Hi all,
>
> I want to divide the incoming traffic between what should go to
> the firewall and what should be forwarded to the local network
> behind it. I started wit
Hi all,
I want to divide the incoming traffic between what should go to
the firewall and what should be forwarded to the local network
behind it. I started with the IMQ example config, but added an
extra htb class right below "10:1" to get the two sfq's to borrow
each other's bandwidth.
However,
Hi,
I would like to know if IMQ (http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/) is going
to be ported to the 2.6 kernel.
Please let me know.
--
S.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Do you patch iptables? Do you make .IMQ-test executable?
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:10:57PM -0300, Esteban wrote:
E>hi,
E>i cant get the -j IMQ on netfilter. The module is loaded
E>Module Size Used byTainted: P
E>ipt_IMQ 768 0 (unused)
E>imq
hi,
i cant get the -j IMQ on netfilter. The module is loaded
Module Size Used byTainted: P
ipt_IMQ 768 0 (unused)
imq 1912 0 (unused)
but i cant find the object in /usr/local/lib/netfilter/*imq.so
i tryed recompiling manualy ipta
On Thursday 03 July 2003 07:45, ? wrote:
> In my shaper I run htb on a bridge. I shape with success the kazaa and
> winmx traffic. As about Kazaa you have to place filters for tcp port
> 1214 and it will work fine.
Or try the layer 7 filter patch for the kernel (but I think it's only r
In my shaper I run htb on a bridge. I shape with success the kazaa and
winmx traffic. As about Kazaa you have to place filters for tcp port
1214 and it will work fine.
Best regards
Stamatis
Esteban wrote:
Someone posted once a script based on htb+imq to handle kazaa and web
traffic..both direc
I have no idea what you are talking about, since i never saw that email. If
you want to filter traffic, anaylize the paquet contents, searching for a
string common on kazaa packets and http traffic packets, so you can mark
then and hence redirect them to the correct queue. ¿Get what i say?
Someone posted once a script based on htb+imq to handle kazaa and web
traffic..both directions, download and upload.
If someone still have it, could it post again?
i searched on posted mailing list but couldnt find it.
Thanks!
___
LARTC mailing list /
Hi,
Maybe someone could help me with this ...
I'm doing some rate limiting tests with large bandwidth (>3MBytes).
HTB qdisc + IMQ just work fine on outgoing traffic, results are almost
perfect
but with incoming traffic it's not the same ...
Results are quite good up to 3MBytes of total shaped in
Hi All,
I am a newbie
I have gone thru the archive for a couple of days now, and kind find
postings that related to what am trying to do, I would appreciate it, if
someone could help me with their sample script which I can tweak.
My setup involves eth0 - Internet, eth1 - LAN
I have 10 compute
Hey...;)
Can you please look through this months archives. Me and a lot of
others have put up some scripts that will work for you.
Trevor
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 02:11, Chijioke Kalu wrote:
> I know I shld read the docs properly but am still having a problem tailoring
> it to suite my needs. I
I know I shld read the docs properly but am still having a problem tailoring
it to suite my needs. If someone can mail me his sample script which may be
close enough to my setup, I would appreciate it, I can try again to work
from there
I got 3 interfaces, eth0 to my internet, eth1 to my lan a
[debian sarge]
Hi
I am planning to use kernel 2.4.21-ac3 with the IMQ patch, since the
vanilla 2.4.21 kernel does not compile with gcc 3.3 (the default
compiler on debian sarge).
Are there any known issues/gotchas with ac3 patch?
Thanks in Advance
Regards
--
K S Sreeram
Director of Research
I wrote this just as FYU for another users
I use IMQ at my work routers so I won't crash tham
And I far I know this crash I got only when traffic going
throw this interface
So I you said IP does not need for this interface and may
this this feature need to be described in documentation
Thanks
On W
Alexander Trotsai wrote:
Something about IMQ device
I try to add imq0 with standard way in redhat distribution
via ifcfg-imq0 file (and add line in modules.conf) and got
BUG
If I attache IP address to IMQ device withing next hours
(may be days, randomly) kernel crash with stack dump and
panic
With
Something about IMQ device
I try to add imq0 with standard way in redhat distribution
via ifcfg-imq0 file (and add line in modules.conf) and got
BUG
If I attache IP address to IMQ device withing next hours
(may be days, randomly) kernel crash with stack dump and
panic
Without address same configura
Jan Rafaj has been so kind to update the imq patch to 2.4.21 and
iptables-1.2.8.
No functional changes have been made. The updated patch and instructions are
available at http://trash.net/~kaber. This is the only place where this
and future
updates (if any) will be available. I'm going to replace
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi again
I'm not sure I made myself clear.
Before using IMQ I was using ingress on ppp0 and egress on eth0 to police
incoming traffic to the LAN.
Now i'm using IMQ. I would like to do something like that:
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j IMQ -i ppp0
iptables -t man
Hi,
My setup is:
LAN --(eth0)-- GW/FW --(ppp0)-- Internet
How to distinguish incoming traffic to the gateway from the traffic to the LAN ?
I'm using 'iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j IMQ -i ppp0' to send incoming traffic
to imq0
Now I would like to put incoming traffic to the gateway and i
>then you need to use NF_IP_PRI_FILTER < x < NF_IP_PRI_NAT_SRC,
>for example NF_IP_PRI_FILTER + 1 or NF_IP_PRI_NAT_SRC - 1.
>look into include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h for a list of pre-defined values.
>
>Patrick
thanks for your help, i only wonder if NF_IP_PRI_MANGLE+1 would be
sufficient, since th
mikee wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if i change imq-patch
+static struct nf_hook_ops imq_egress_ipv4 = {
+ { NULL, NULL},
+ imq_nf_hook,
+ PF_INET,
+ NF_IP_POST_ROUTING,
+ NF_IP_PRI_LAST
+};
to
+ NF_IP_POST_ROUTING,
+ NF_IP_PRI_MANGLE+1
will this be working correc
Dear all,
Has anyone tried to use IMQ with DSMARK before?
I plan to use it to do DSCP remarking @ ingress.
Care to share your experience? Any problem, etc..
My config: RH8 (kernel 2.4.18-14) iptables 1.2.6a
Thanks and Regards,
Titus
___
LARTC mail
Hi,
I wonder if i change imq-patch
+static struct nf_hook_ops imq_egress_ipv4 = {
+ { NULL, NULL},
+ imq_nf_hook,
+ PF_INET,
+ NF_IP_POST_ROUTING,
+ NF_IP_PRI_LAST
+};
to
+ NF_IP_POST_ROUTING,
+ NF_IP_PRI_MANGLE+1
will this be working correctly?
(I'd like
> Do you have the iptables source installed in /usr/src/iptables-1.2.6a
&&
> Iptables is in two parts. Kernel space and userspace. The
> imq-2.4.18.diff-10 patch is for kernel space only. This one is for
> userspace.
ahh, that clears it up. Will try again in a couple hours. thanks guys
Jay
___
Ok, I untarred a new copy of the 2.4.20 source and then i applied the
http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/imq-2.4.18.diff-10 patch against it with
patch -p1 <../imq-2.4.18.diff-10 which produced this output:
patching file Documentation/Configure.help
Hunk #1 succeeded at 8758 (offset 402 lines).
patching
On Monday 31 March 2003 05:15, Jay Wineinger wrote:
> Hey guys,
> I want to use IMQ with netfilter support. I know that I need to patch
> the kernel (2.4.20) to get this to work properly. Ive tried a number of
> things so far and I cant seem to get to the the IMQ target support for
> netfilte
Kjell Chris Flor wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03827.html
you can't add ingress and egress packets into
the same IMQ device from the same physical device.
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j IMQ
iptables -t mangle -A PRETROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ
Is this problem
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03827.html
you can't add ingress and egress packets into
the same IMQ device from the same physical device.
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j IMQ
iptables -t mangle -A PRETROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ
Is this problem solved?
**
Hey guys,
I want to use IMQ with netfilter support. I know that I need to patch
the kernel (2.4.20) to get this to work properly. Ive tried a number of
things so far and I cant seem to get to the the IMQ target support for
netfilter to appear in the make menuconfig. Anyways, could someone po
I asked Patrick about NAT and IMQ and he referred me to an archive
post on this:
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html
I have applied this patch and it is working as expected.
Contents included below:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--0200010
Hello
I have a server with a dsl connection on eth1 and local interface eth0.
Because of the NAT i cannot direct traffic to IMQ device in PREROUTING chain
but have to use INPUT and FORWARD. So i use rules.
iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0
iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -i eth1
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 01:22:38AM +0100, Jirka Pirko wrote:
JP>is here anybody successfully running HTB + IMQ for ingress traffic?? i can't
JP>do it :(
JP>i'm using following commands:
JP># ifconfig imq0 up
JP># iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth2 -j IMQ --todev imq0
I see mistake at line
On Monday 17 March 2003 01:22, Jirka Pirko wrote:
> is here anybody successfully running HTB + IMQ for ingress traffic?? i
> can't do it :(
>
> i'm using following commands:
>
> # ifconfig imq0 up
> # iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth2 -j IMQ --todev imq0
> # tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle
is here anybody successfully running HTB + IMQ for ingress traffic?? i can't
do it :(
i'm using following commands:
# ifconfig imq0 up
# iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth2 -j IMQ --todev imq0
# tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1 htb default 0
# tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:2 h
On Friday 14 March 2003 15:13, David Watson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using IMQ on my firewall to manage downloads by two networks
> within
> the firewall. I mark traffic in iptables, and jump to IMQ from postrouting.
> This allows me to manage the traffic coming from the internet eve
Hello,
I am using IMQ on my firewall to manage downloads by two networks within
the firewall. I mark traffic in iptables, and jump to IMQ from postrouting.
This allows me to manage the traffic coming from the internet even though
it is leaving on 2 interfaces, however I think I've hit a limi
On Sunday 02 March 2003 17:17, asko askeltaja wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone patched 2.4.20 kernel with imq? Can you please tell how to do
> it...i tried
Try
patch -p1 < ./imq-2.4.18.diff-10,
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @
Hi,
Has anyone patched 2.4.20 kernel with imq? Can you please tell how to do it...i tried
patch -p1 ./imq-2.4.18.diff-10, but nothing happen.
Regards,
Asko
Maksuton sähköposti aina käytössä http://luukku.com
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 13:48, Kjell Chris Flor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Q1: How does IMQ know what phy devices it is a "mother" for?
>
> I read the manual, faq and source, but fail to see how.
>
> The closest I get is when reading source where it sais
> that IMQ makes it possible to use classes to r
Hi,
Q1: How does IMQ know what phy devices it is a "mother" for?
I read the manual, faq and source, but fail to see how.
The closest I get is when reading source where it sais
that IMQ makes it possible to use classes to refer to
phy. dev. but I'm not able to see this relation in examples
where
Hello,
I am using the IMQ with iptables (latest versions) and asking all packets to
be enqueued to IMQ0 from both prerouting and postrouting (using different
iptables rules to mark different streams). When I do this I get the kernel
saying:
"Dead loop on netdevice imq0, fix it urgently!" and comm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 06 February 2003 18:23, Robert Penz wrote:
argh, found my mistake, I've forgotten the "IMQ target support"
- --
Regards,
Robert
-
Robert Penz
robert.penz AT outertech.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I've running imq on some servers and it works everywhere except the new
machine I just try to set up.
on that machine I get that
tsunami:/usr/src# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
for
Hello,
please keep in mind that there is a BUG in IMQ code so you can't
add ingress and egress packets into the same IMQ device from the same
physical device.
e.g.
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j IMQ
iptables -t mangle -A PRETROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ
You will get kernel panic
Leszek,
: Configuring IMQ for egress traffic, it is not possible
: to specify interfaces which we want use to shape.
I'm afraid I'll have to disagree! :) Try adding the "-o interface" flag
to your iptables command to select based on the output interface.
Instead of:
iptables -t mangle -A P
Hello!
Configuring IMQ for egress traffic, it is not possible
to specify interfaces which we want use to shape.
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j IMQ in effect direct
all packets to IMQ pseudo-device, independent from interface
the packet is going to out. How to specify, that we want to
send to
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Aaron Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anybody got imq running on iptables 1.2.7a. The home page for imq only
> seems to have a patch for 1.2.6a.
I'm successfully run iptables 1.2.7a with patch from IMQ homepage.
The thing what I only does to get i
101 - 200 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
