Jay Vosburgh schrieb:
> Another similar Rube Goldberg sort of scheme I've set up in the
> past (in the lab, for bonding testing, not in a production environment,
> your mileage may vary, etc, etc) is to dedicate particular switch ports
> to particular vlans. So, e.g.,
>
> linux box eth0 ---
Jay Vosburgh schrieb:
> Grant Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On 07/31/07 06:01, Ralf Gross wrote:
> >> But I don't have an isolated network. Maybe I'm still too blind to see a
> >> simple solution.
First, thanks for your very detailed reply.
[...]
> >The only other nasty thing that come
Grant Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 07/31/07 06:01, Ralf Gross wrote:
>> But I don't have an isolated network. Maybe I'm still too blind to see a
>> simple solution.
There really isn't a simple solution, since you're not doing
something simple. It sounds simple to say you want to
On 07/31/07 10:31, Ralf Gross wrote:
I've talked to one of the people of the network staff. He meant they
never used CEF in this type of scenario. I'm also not very familiar
with Cicso products.
My physical scenario is a Cisco 3640 router with two (10BaseT) ethernet
connections connected to ex
Grant Taylor schrieb:
> >I think it's not possible with the Cisco switches we use here to
> >increase the bandwidth between 2 hosts on L2.
>
> It sounds like a "per packet" or "per flow" decision that is defaulting
> to "per flow" for deciding which port on an EtherChannel to use.
>
> I'm not t
On 07/31/07 06:01, Ralf Gross wrote:
But I don't have an isolated network. Maybe I'm still too blind to
see a simple solution.
This is why Paul's solution, though accurate, will not work in your
scenario.
The fact that you are trying to go across an aggregated link in the
middle between the
Paul Zirnik schrieb:
> > > On Monday 30 July 2007 16:10, Ralf Gross wrote:
> > > > My goal is to increase the bandwidth for a single tcp session between
> > > > the two hosts for a backup job (per packet round robin?), not for
> > > > multiple connections between many hosts. I know that I won't get
Paul Zirnik schrieb:
> This is why i sayed you need two different switches. With only one the switch
> will allways send only to one port, because he knows the MAC address
> and will not balance traffic on two or more ports with the same MAC address
> as destination. Etherchannel has no balancing
On Monday 30 July 2007 22:48, Ralf Gross wrote:
> Paul Zirnik schrieb:
> > On Monday 30 July 2007 16:10, Ralf Gross wrote:
> > > My goal is to increase the bandwidth for a single tcp session between
> > > the two hosts for a backup job (per packet round robin?), not for
> > > multiple connections b
On 07/30/07 15:48, Ralf Gross wrote:
I tried this setup a while ago. Both hosts were connected to a Cisco
switch. On the linux hosts I created bond0 interfaces (round robin)
and the switch ports on both switches were configured as Port
Channels.
Seeing as how this is a short coming of the switc
On 07/30/07 15:12, Ralf Gross wrote:
I've tried bonding before. But this didn't work either because the
cisco switch decides on a src/dst mac/ip hash which port of the port
channel will be used. But in my case the hash is always the same
because between host A and host B. Thus always the same i
Paul Zirnik schrieb:
> On Monday 30 July 2007 16:10, Ralf Gross wrote:
> >
> > My goal is to increase the bandwidth for a single tcp session between
> > the two hosts for a backup job (per packet round robin?), not for
> > multiple connections between many hosts. I know that I won't get 2 x
> > 115
Grant Taylor schrieb:
> On 07/30/07 09:10, Ralf Gross wrote:
> >I'm trying to increase the bandwidth between two hosts (backup). Both
> >hosts are in the same /24 subnet and each of them is connected to a
> >Cisco switch by 2 GbE interfaces (intel e1000). The switches/host are
> >located in diff
On Monday 30 July 2007 16:10, Ralf Gross wrote:
>
> My goal is to increase the bandwidth for a single tcp session between
> the two hosts for a backup job (per packet round robin?), not for
> multiple connections between many hosts. I know that I won't get 2 x
> 115Mb/s because of packet reordering
On 07/30/07 09:10, Ralf Gross wrote:
I'm trying to increase the bandwidth between two hosts (backup). Both
hosts are in the same /24 subnet and each of them is connected to a
Cisco switch by 2 GbE interfaces (intel e1000). The switches/host are
located in different building which are connected
That sounds like an overly complicated way to do it. I would just
create a 512kbit class with subclasses for the internet traffic, and
route all MAN traffic into a 100mbit class. Should be some way to know
which ip's will go to the MAN. Creating a virtual interface makes little
sense here, si
Hi there...
I have an idea for you, just don't ask me how to implement it.
1. bring up some virtual interface, I'm almost sure linux has some way of
doing it. this interface should output data to your real interface.
2. try to route all MAN traffic trough this interface. you'll need to know the
On 6/17/05, Omry Yadan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am trying to shape my upstream bandwidth, mostly per port. and I am
> having some problems getting things to work the way I want them to.
>
> before I throw my configuration at you guys ;), I`d like to debug it by
> myself - but I was
l-label="bytes per second" \
-w 600 -h 200 \
DEF:http=$WDIR/rrd/webserver.rrd:http:AVERAGE \
DEF:https=$WDIR/rrd/webserver.rrd:https:AVERAGE \
AREA:http#00ff00:"HTTP traffic" > /dev/null
echo "Done"
Cheers,
Andreas
hareram ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) schrieb:
>
>
You can do this with iptraf. You can call it with
iptraf -s{yourinterface} -t1 -B
and it will output per port statistics in it's logfile for 1 minute (-t1) that
looks like this:
TCP/22: 564 packets, 101772 bytes total, 13.57 kbits/s; 341 packets, 24968
bytes incoming, 3.32 kbits/s; 223 packets,
Andy Furniss wrote:
Fatih Düzova wrote:
Hi,
I implemented queues on some ports with htb by filtering. and to have
a constant bw, i defined rate and ceil the same. But while watching
the bw's, I ve realized they may sometimes exceed the defined value
for short periods.
How are you measuring t
Fatih Düzova wrote:
Hi,
I implemented queues on some ports with htb by filtering. and to have
a constant bw, i defined rate and ceil the same. But while watching
the bw's, I ve realized they may sometimes exceed the defined value
for short periods.
How are you measuring this and what rates do y
Ionut Gogu wrote:
Hello!
I'm using a Slackware Linux as a router and 50 IP addresses for my
LAN Clients.
Is there any program i can install that will be able to tell me:
how much (ie. kbps) each individual IP is using at moment t?
salut, :)
u can use tcptrack, supports libcap expressio
Dnia czwartek 03 luty 2005 14:08, Ionut Gogu napisał:
> Hello!
> I'm using a Slackware Linux as a router and 50 IP addresses for my LAN
> Clients. Is there any program i can install that will be able to tell me:
>
> how much (ie. kbps) each individual IP is using at moment t?
Try jnettop.
http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pdw/iftop/
-- Nikolay Datchev
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Ionut Gogu wrote:
Hello!
I'm using a Slackware Linux as a router and 50 IP addresses for my LAN
Clients.
Is there any program i can install that will be able to tell me:
how much (ie. kbps) each individual IP is us
Hello
You can use a set of tools : htb_tools 0.2.5 for bandwidth management,
bandwidth statistics ;Documentation and HowTo you can find at
www.arny.ro/htb , a set of configurations file/exemple etc; For more
informations please contact me;
http://www.arny.ro/htb/htb_tools-0.2.5/docs/Ho
On Thursday 13 January 2005 14:02, Johan Jordaan wrote:
> In my search to control bandwidth on my network I found 2 projects..
>
> 1. TC
> 2. BWM Tools - http://freshmeat.net/projects/bwmtools/
>
> This brings me to 2 questions...
>
> Firstly, can TC control bandwidth in both directions?
It can sha
Andy Furniss wrote:
Darryl Cording wrote:
I guess I could match by ip addresses but I hoping for a simpler way
to match everthing.
You were close - default refers to the number after the :
I guess I am still struggling with the syntax of tc.
10: is short for 10:0 .
Thanks for that clue.
tc qdi
Darryl Cording wrote:
Darryl Cording wrote:
But it seems my ftp transfers are not being shaped, in fact, lol, they
are going faster from when I first started experimenting. So it's not
matching correctly. I just want to shape everything going past the
NIC's. I thought that if I could classify th
Darryl Cording wrote:
But it seems my ftp transfers are not being shaped, in fact, lol, they
are going faster from when I first started experimenting. So it's not
matching correctly. I just want to shape everything going past the
NIC's. I thought that if I could classify the entire ip protocol o
Darryl Cording wrote:
Right, because it wasn't classified.
Ok, so I have to classify my traffic before this will route them throu
the qdisc. Are you taking about classifying via iptables?? I thought
that was optional, more for filtering ...etc.
regards
darryl
I was getting confused with the term
Thanks for the feedback Jason,
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 22:29, Darryl Cording wrote:
I am trying to build a Linux router that simply throttles everything
down to certain bandwidths. That is, no priority queuing ...etc, just
slow all traffic down to the specified rates, whi
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 22:29, Darryl Cording wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build a Linux router that simply throttles everything
> down to certain bandwidths. That is, no priority queuing ...etc, just
> slow all traffic down to the specified rates, which are 64,128,256,512
> kbit. We want
ber 2004 4:20 AM
To: Jake
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth and download control
Trying to "control" the incoming traffic at Server (to use your
topology) is
very difficult. It can be done with IMQ, but setting that up requires
patching, and its not completely reliable.
The easiest way to
thing deferred when I send through
procmail for spamassassin...
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Jake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Chris Bennett'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 11:56 PM
Subject: R
OTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2004 4:20 AM
To: Jake
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth and download control
Trying to "control" the incoming traffic at Server (to use your
topology) is
very difficult. It can be done with IMQ, but setting that up requires
patching, and its not completely r
On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 01:17, EC wrote:
> >On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 00:03, EC wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Is there a way to do the following with lartc tools :
> >> I would like to limit any entering user to not use more than Xkb/mb to my
> >> website. The IPs they use are changing all the time so static
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 00:03, EC wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to do the following with lartc tools :
> I would like to limit any entering user to not use more than Xkb/mb to my
> website. The IPs they use are changing all the time so static IP limitation
> cannot be used. Is there a way doing so
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 16:25, Tomasz Chilinski wrote:
> This is not good solution cause of high load where you account many
nets
> and/or hosts. In my opinion ACCOUNT/account from netfilter.org
> patch-o-matic-ng are the best solutions for mass accounting.
>
> Bests,
> Tomasz Chilinski
Perhaps you
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:17:00 +0200, Daniel Frederiksen wrote
> Note: This solution is primarily for general host traffic
> accumulation based on a subnet. The stats are collected via libpcap
> and can be done in promiscuous mode. This is not for website stats,
> for that you need to parse your w
Hello Patrick
I personally use ipfm (http://freshmeat.net/projects/ipfm/) to do the
traffic logging, and then I got a home brewed perl script running in
cron every 5 min. to parse the accumulated data and create/update a RRD
(http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/) base for each
host.
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, andybr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a firewall central which a control the
> download/upload bandwidth with cbq of 9 differents
> networks. Now i need some help from you. I would like
> to use mrtg+snmp to reports these bandwidth to show per
> ip, how? any idea? tips?
>
A simpl
On Sunday 20 June 2004 19:33, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> It's been 4 days since I posted a question and did not receive any
> answer. Can you give me a hint if linux 'tc' 'iproute2' tools are
> able to do what I need?
>
> I don't even know if they can do this and I should continue t
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 03:12:56PM -0300, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote:
> This is the network:
>
> 192.168.1.2 --+
> 192.168.1.3 --+ Router
> 192.168.1.4 --+ Linux/2.4
> 192.168.1.5 --+ eth0 eth1 internetprovider1
> 200.x.x.2 +
> 200.x.x.3 +
> 200.x.x.4 +
Maybe the lin
Hi,
Sorry, I forgot something. I didn't add the "ceil" parameter.
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 128kbit ceil
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 128kbit cei
Hi,
I'm fairly new to this too, but if I understand correctly, you can do
this with htb.
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 128kbit
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 ht
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. I guess it would be best to provide a little more
detail on the problem.
I've got 100+ users. Each of these users have a particular level/speed
of service. These range from 128kbit to 1024kbit. I need a way to set a
limit for each user based on their level/speed of ser
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 08:05, kaushalender1 wrote:
> Hi group,
> I am new to this group and linux.we have a linux box on which we are
> giving bandwidth to multiple customers..this box have two ethernet
>interface eth0 and eth1 .Eth0 is directly connected to internet and
>eth1 is connected to cust
try pyshaper - http://www.freenet.org.nz/python/pyshaper
Very easy yet very versatile
Josh Beagley wrote:
Howdy,
I have searched and read many other mailing list posts/usenet
posts etc, however seem unable to find a direct answer for my
problem
I have a 2Mbit link network, and was wanting
Hi.
hare ram wrote:
yes its very much possible
please visit http://lartc.og
or docum.org for examples
In addition to this, here is one pointer that might be interesting for
you (andybr):
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.classful.html#AEN1072
Bye, Mike
_
Hi
yes its very much possible
please visit http://lartc.og
or docum.org for examples
hare
- Original Message -
From: "andybr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lartc List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 6:27 PM
Subject: [LARTC] Bandwidth Control
Hello All,
I have a link o
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 19:02, Patrick Turley wrote:
> This is, of course, very valuable feedback. Unfortunately, given the
> responses I've had so far, I see that I didn't make it clear what I'm
> really looking for.
I also did some htb tests. I created scripts that uses iptables or tc
counte
This is, of course, very valuable feedback. Unfortunately, given the
responses I've had so far, I see that I didn't make it clear what I'm really
looking for.
I believe that my colleague's test methodology is flawed. I believe that you
cannot generate reliable bandwidth measurements by ftp'ing fil
This is, of course, very valuable feedback. Unfortunately, given the
responses I've had so far, I see that I didn't make it clear what I'm really
looking for.
I believe that my colleague's test methodology is flawed. I believe that you
cannot generate reliable bandwidth measurements by ftp'ing fil
This is, of course, very valuable feedback. Unfortunately, given the
responses I've had so far, I see that I didn't make it clear what I'm really
looking for.
I believe that my colleague's test methodology is flawed. I believe that you
cannot generate reliable bandwidth measurements by ftp'ing fil
Hello Patrick,
Please excuse my suggestion if you have already considered the issue I
indicate below from Stef's FAQ.
: I have measured the performance of HTB with iperf and found it to be
: very close to expected (i.e., within 5%). I have a colleague who is
: measuring the performance by ftp'
Eddie,
: Well the thing is I need to learn bandwidth management,fast.
: Well I've read a few stuff but the thing is,as I understand,there is
: lots of ways and "languages" to use,cbq,htb ens.What is the best and you
: now of a howto just for that specific one?
This gives some references:
h
Good morning, Leon,
: I'm trying to setup my server to bandwidth control. Where we live
: bandwidth is very expensive and we need to closely monitor it. We'll
: buy 512kbps and this will have to be shared between 4 companies. Thus
: giving everybody a minimum if 128kbps but it must be burstabl
On Thursday 30 October 2003 15:34, Ryan Vilim wrote:
> Oh, I am sorry I probably should have specified the setup of my network
> (stupid mistake by me :p). I have a server (linux) a laptop (linux) and
> my parents computer (windows). These are all connected to the internet
> via my router which is
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 05:32, Stef Coene wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2003 22:35, Ryan Vilim wrote:
> > It seems I have quite a difficult (for me) bandwidth shaping problem.
> > What I want is this;
> >
> > Port 80 and port 21 will share 30 kilobytes of the 50kilobytes upstream
> > my ISP gives
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 22:35, Ryan Vilim wrote:
> It seems I have quite a difficult (for me) bandwidth shaping problem.
> What I want is this;
>
> Port 80 and port 21 will share 30 kilobytes of the 50kilobytes upstream
> my ISP gives me, bittorrent will get 10 maximum (ports 6881-6890), and
>
On Friday 10 October 2003 21:59, Randolph Carter wrote:
> Sure stef, no aproximation methods? some probabilistic/statistical
> approach to the problem?
You can control the bandwidth even if you send more data then your modem can
handle. But you will have less control then the situation of where Y
Sure stef, no aproximation methods? some probabilistic/statistical
approach to the problem?
"The two most common things in the universe are hydrogen and
stupidity."
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Stef Coene wrote:
> On Friday 10 October 2003 16:54, Randolph Carter wrote:
> > Sometimes (especially with DSL
On Friday 10 October 2003 16:54, Randolph Carter wrote:
> Sometimes (especially with DSL) in my location when you bought a channel
> say 128Kbps, there are some "peak" times when you can get even 256Kbps,
> and another times the channel can go down to least than 128Kbps(in that
> case the queuing d
Hello Mike,
Thanks for pointing out this software.I am trying to configure this software
and i am facing problem in mysql-jdbc connector driver.
I have one more doubt on IPStat itself:
I read the README file in that it has given the user information..
1. do we need to feed the data in the databas
> Is there any way to findout the bandwidth used by a client(LAN user), from
> Linux gateway server.
>
> I have to take monthly statistics of bandwidth used by a client (LAN
> user).
You could use iptables for that purpose. If you just want to monitor a
single client you have to setup a simple rul
Sathi
In linux server just install iptraf and then you can view the traffic on
per ip basis. First you have to match ip address and its mac address
then you can match that in iptraf and then you can see the incoming and
outgoing traffic of particular client on ip basis.
Joel
On Fri, 2003
On Friday 29 August 2003 13:15, Sathyan wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Is there any way to findout the bandwidth used by a client(LAN user), from
> Linux gateway server.
If it's only for one client, you can create an iptables with his ip address.
You then can read the iptabels counters each 5 minutes to
On Saturday 23 August 2003 18:55, Gustaf wrote:
> I have just read trough the HOWTO but its soo large.
> I wonder if anyone have some simple examples of making everyone on my
> lan to share the bandwidth equally.
>
> So if I'm the only one using the connection I get all the bandwidth but
> if someo
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, [iso-8859-1] Sebastián Aresca wrote:
> Anybody knows about one bandwidth meter to use in Bering.
You might want give nanotop a try. It shows a line like this:
CPU: [==- ] MEM: 8.8MB LAN: 1.0kB/s(RX) 454.00B/s(TX) 0(ERR
Dynamically built and stripped, the execu
Hi,
Have a look at
http://ldp.kernelnotes.de/HOWTO/Querying-libiptc-HOWTO/bmeter.html
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
At 01:50 p.m. 01/08/03 -0300, you wrote:
Anybody knows about one bandwidth meter to use in Bering.
This is a script i built, it's works wel, but it's not very nice!!! =P
#!/b
Madhuri,
: > For download, you
: > can use 3 links but only if you NAT and you have a lot of
: > connections so you can load balance the different connections (like
: > http traffic).
:
: Can you provide some pointers on how to do this, especially load balancing?
Try the nano HOWTO, posted
Hi,
Thanks for the response.
> For download, you
> can use 3 links but only if you NAT and you have a lot of connections so you
> can load balance the different connections (like http traffic).
Can you provide some pointers on how to do this, especially load balancing?
Thanks,
Madhuri
> A
On Saturday 26 July 2003 11:39, madhuri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have three WAN links each of capacity 2 Mbps.
>
> There is a one linux box per link which is used for NAT and firewall. So
> I have three linux boxes and three WAN links to talk to the internet.
>
> We want to do bandwidth shaping over the
fault
routes with weights? Or do we have to do this explicitly with ppp-up?
Mohan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of hare ram
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 4:54 PM
To: Madhuri Patwardhan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LARTC] bandwidth shaping
day, July 26, 2003 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] bandwidth shaping over multiple WAN links
>
>
> We are using redhat 8.0, however we can switch to redhat 9.0 if required.
>
> So you have one linux box with multiple ethernet cards each connected to a
> seperate WAN link and you are
We are using redhat 8.0, however we can switch to redhat 9.0 if required.
So you have one linux box with multiple ethernet cards each connected to a
seperate WAN link and you are doing traffic shaping over these links?
I have read about load balancing with 'teq' or something like that with
linu
Hi Madhuri
yes its possible,
you can make all link one big pipe and share the load equally
to do this you need to add some patches to you kernel
you did not mention what distro are you using
iam using redhat 9.0, with multiple links working fine
best of luck
hare
- Original Message --
On Monday 30 June 2003 20:25, Steve Wright wrote:
> Bernard Robbins wrote:
> > Stef,
> >
> > Can you point me to the location of the docs for the filters + policers?
> >
> >> Incoming traffic can be controlled with filters + policers. Or a
> >> more complicated setup can be done with IMQ + HTB.
>
Bernard Robbins wrote:
Stef,
Can you point me to the location of the docs for the filters + policers?
Incoming traffic can be controlled with filters + policers. Or a
more complicated setup can be done with IMQ + HTB.
Stef
I could use this information also..
TIA,
Steve
_
Hi
I would strongly recommend going with IMQ + HTB. I just installed it
yesterday. It just works beautifully. It gives you the full flexibility
in using HTB SFQ etc, to shape incoming traffic.
Makes me wonder... How come IMQ is not yet part of the standard kernel?
Is it going to be coming in 2.4.
Stef,
Can you point me to the location of the docs for the filters + policers?
Stef Coene wrote:
On Monday 23 June 2003 14:31, K S Sreeram wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 05:47, Trevor Warren wrote:
Hello Sreram,
AFAIK all Traffic Shaping be it Ingress/Egress can be done at your end.
This will he
On Monday 23 June 2003 14:31, K S Sreeram wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 05:47, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > Hello Sreram,
> >
> > AFAIK all Traffic Shaping be it Ingress/Egress can be done at your end.
> > This will help majorly on the link at your end by prioritising trafic
> > appropriately.
> >
>
> Message: 11
> Subject: RE: [LARTC] bandwidth limiting incoming data
> From: K S Sreeram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 24 Jun 2003 09:18:18 +0530
>
> On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 22:05, S Mohan wrote:
> > Let us say eth0 is connected the Interne
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of K S Sreeram
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:01 PM
> To: lartc
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] bandwidth limiting incoming data
>
>
> On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 05:47, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > Hello Sreram,
>
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 05:47, Trevor Warren wrote:
> Hello Sreram,
>
> AFAIK all Traffic Shaping be it Ingress/Egress can be done at your end.
> This will help majorly on the link at your end by prioritising trafic
> appropriately.
>
> You can't possibly change traffic priorities at your isps e
Hello Sreram,
AFAIK all Traffic Shaping be it Ingress/Egress can be done at your end.
This will help majorly on the link at your end by prioritising trafic
appropriately.
You can't possibly change traffic priorities at your isps end.
Trevor
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 17:38, K S Sreeram wrote:
>
- Original Message -
From: "sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Παρασκευή, 20 Ιουνίου 2003 5:43 μμ
Subject: [LARTC] bandwidth management by ip
> How can I manage bandwidth by ip on a linux box.I am a newbie in linux
management.
Is the web site down or something? This
On Friday 04 April 2003 02:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I own a WIreless ISP and have recently began suppling bandwidth to college
> dorms. As I expected, 90% of the bandwidth they consume is downloading
> music with programs such as Kazaa. I would like to throttle this
> bandwidth, only as nee
On Monday 10 March 2003 15:48, Jon Lawrence wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking for a way to limit bandwidth to/from clients using a
> contended 2Mb link. What I'm looking for is to allow a client machine to
> use the full 2Mb but only if there is no traffic to/from other clients.
> I've been looking at htb
Yes,
You can use tc on a bridge. See also this thread:
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2003q1/007378.html
If you are just going to perform traffic control, and you don't need to
use iptables, you don't need the bridge+nf functionality.
Add your filters to the "real" devices, not br0.
On Monday 03 March 2003 21:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, I've got a problem with HTB bandwidth limiting. I've read many docs
> and manuals and I still don't know what is wrong. I've got an internet
> connection on ppp0. I'm trying to set some limits on it, but it doesn't
> work. Now, I'm tryin
Hello there again,
: > I recommend the Sangoma WAN cards. I've been using them for at least 3
: > years under linux, and they are well supported by Sangoma and the linux
: > community (you'll see the driver in the distribution).
:
: Regarding Sangoma solution, what Linux kernel version they
g-Ching Tiew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth control using Linux or other router
> Hello all,
>
> : 1. Purchase a router which has some form of bandwidth management - this
> :would b
Hello all,
: 1. Purchase a router which has some form of bandwidth management - this
:would be expensive, rite ?
You have to decide what is expensive for you. Time, money, expertise,
control, or not having a software/networking vendor to vilify.
: 2. Purchase a low end router with 1 lan
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Bandwidth Restrictions in Linux
Hello
We are ISP and we give Internet Wireless Outdoor Service . The
Base Station
works in 802.11b and it is connected with a Linux Mandrake Server
that make
NAT.
802.11b devices are by design experiencing
.
Thanks
Tushar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Mathieu Deziel
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 7:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Bandwidth Restrictions in Linux
>
> Hello
> >
>
> Hello
> > We are ISP and we give Internet Wireless Outdoor Service . The
> > Base Station
> > works in 802.11b and it is connected with a Linux Mandrake Server
> > that make
> > NAT.
> 802.11b devices are by design experiencing "hidden node" effect.
"Hidden node" problem can be avoided by the
; Lartc@Mailman. Ds9a. Nl
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Bandwidth Restrictions in Linux
Hi,
> So, you were limiting bandwidth with CBQ... and now you change to HTB...??
Yes.
>
> What bandwidth you limited with CBQ and to how many clients...??
In most cases 128 kbit/s and for some special classes
Hi,
> So, you were limiting bandwidth with CBQ... and now you change to HTB...??
Yes.
>
> What bandwidth you limited with CBQ and to how many clients...??
In most cases 128 kbit/s and for some special classes of trafic
96,80,64,48,40,39,32,24 kbit/s. MInimum guaranted rates of 15kbit/s.
Of course
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
