[Lazarus] Lazarus 1.0.10 Release

2013-06-12 Thread Mattias Gaertner
The Lazarus team is glad to announce the release of Lazarus 1.0.10. This is a bug fix release, built with the fpc 2.6.2. The previous release 1.0.8 was built with 2.6.2 too, while release 1.0.6 was built with 2.6.0. Here is the list of changes for Lazarus and Free Pascal:

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Schnell
On 06/10/2013 08:55 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Where is UNICODE defined ? Isn't the define UNICODE a heritage from Delphi ( version xyz) ? I suppose FPC and Lazarus need to stay compatible on that behalf. -Michael -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Schnell
Is there already published (or somehow definable) road map for a string-wise Delphi XE compatible FPC / Lazarus combination ? I am eager to (finally !!) show my colleagues - who always use the current Delphi release - a way to port their projects to Linux -Michael --

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Michael Schnell wrote: On 06/10/2013 08:55 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Where is UNICODE defined ? Isn't the define UNICODE a heritage from Delphi ( version xyz) ? It has a different meaning. I suppose FPC and Lazarus need to stay compatible on that behalf.

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Schnell
On 06/12/2013 11:10 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Not necessarily. Compatible concerning Language/rtl functions, yes. Defines, this is debatable. I do know that my colleagues use UNICODE a lot when porting their (huge) code-base from pre-Unicode Delphi to Unicode aware Delphi versions. So

Re: [Lazarus] Thanks for Lazarus

2013-06-12 Thread Lukasz Sokol
Dunno about FB, but Google+ has a few https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/114860965042324270757 Free Pascal / Lazarus IDE community https://plus.google.com/u/0/107983650593631817381/posts Free Pascal Compiler :) L. On 12/06/2013 00:10, Flávio Etrusco wrote: +1. (BTW noboy created a

Re: [Lazarus] New compiler options page Additions and Overrides

2013-06-12 Thread Lukasz Sokol
Hi, On 11/06/2013 16:54, Mattias Gaertner wrote: [...] No, it is by design. The IDE options are the defaults for all projects. The project options are more specific, so they must come after that. The session options are for the users own experiments. That's why they come last. From

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Michael Schnell wrote: On 06/12/2013 11:10 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Not necessarily. Compatible concerning Language/rtl functions, yes. Defines, this is debatable. I do know that my colleagues use UNICODE a lot when porting their (huge) code-base from

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Schnell
On 06/12/2013 01:35 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Add {$IFDEF FPC} {$DEFINE UNICODE} {$ENDIF} to your source, or, alternatively, fpc -dUNICODE Both do the trick. I'm not sure if this is the trick requested, as the target is to automatically modify their source code in a way that it

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Michael Schnell wrote: On 06/12/2013 01:35 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Add {$IFDEF FPC} {$DEFINE UNICODE} {$ENDIF} to your source, or, alternatively, fpc -dUNICODE Both do the trick. I'm not sure if this is the trick requested, as the target is to

Re: [Lazarus] Thanks for Lazarus

2013-06-12 Thread Raul Parra
https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/118430288678776838534 Firebird https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/117235123572311449920 Codetyphom 2013/6/12 Lukasz Sokol el.es...@gmail.com Dunno about FB, but Google+ has a few https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/114860965042324270757 Free

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Schnell
On 06/12/2013 02:18 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: It is bad practice to rely in code on the defines defined by the compiler. Of course I do know this (and many more similar portability-paradigms). But my colleagues do coding only with Delphi (and thus Windows) in mind. I can't help this.

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Michael Schnell wrote: On 06/12/2013 02:18 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: It is bad practice to rely in code on the defines defined by the compiler. Of course I do know this (and many more similar portability-paradigms). But my colleagues do coding only with Delphi

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Schnell
On 06/12/2013 02:39 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Adding -dUNICODE on the fpc commandline is difficult ? Not at all. A problem would arise, if fpc or Lazarus would define UNICODE in _a_different_ way than Delphi does, and thus simply doing -dUNICODE would be not allowed or not possible.

Re: [Lazarus] Cross compiler

2013-06-12 Thread Antonio Fortuny
Le 27/05/2013 19:28, Sven Barth a écrit : Am 27.05.2013 14:51 schrieb Antonio Fortuny a.fort...@sitasoftware.lu: Because I develop for Win32, Win64, WinCE (win32 based) and Linux x86_64, to have one signle development platform would be a charm. I think this is still a dream and there is a

Re: [Lazarus] Cross compiler

2013-06-12 Thread Sven Barth
Am 12.06.2013 15:22, schrieb Antonio Fortuny: Le 27/05/2013 19:28, Sven Barth a écrit : Am 27.05.2013 14:51 schrieb Antonio Fortuny a.fort...@sitasoftware.lu: Because I develop for Win32, Win64, WinCE (win32 based) and Linux x86_64, to have one signle development platform would be a charm. I

Re: [Lazarus] Regressions in GTK2 interface ?

2013-06-12 Thread Luca Olivetti
Al 13/05/13 11:37, En/na Juha Manninen ha escrit: From Patrick Chevalley : If using the default Gtk theme oxygen-gtk there is no icon. By setting another theme (Clearlooks, qtcurve) all the menu have an icon. I can confirm that. All the problem are gone after switching to Raleigh Gtk2 theme

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote: Is there already published (or somehow definable) road map for a string-wise Delphi XE compatible FPC / Lazarus combination ? No. This is part of that, but only the most initial level. Much is not yet decided. ... including how

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:55:24AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote: On 06/10/2013 08:55 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Where is UNICODE defined ? Isn't the define UNICODE a heritage from Delphi ( version xyz) ? Yes, and if you chose the explicit compatibility mode for that version, $mode

Re: [Lazarus] Unicode branch

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Marco van de Voort wrote: On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:55:24AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote: On 06/10/2013 08:55 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Where is UNICODE defined ? Isn't the define UNICODE a heritage from Delphi ( version xyz) ? Yes, and if you chose the

Re: [Lazarus] New compiler options page Additions and Overrides

2013-06-12 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:12:10 +0100 Lukasz Sokol el.es...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On 11/06/2013 16:54, Mattias Gaertner wrote: [...] No, it is by design. The IDE options are the defaults for all projects. The project options are more specific, so they must come after that. The session

Re: [Lazarus] Gtk3LCL pre-alpha

2013-06-12 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, zel...@holobit.net wrote: Hi folks, I've been working on gtk3lcl for about 2 months, sshoot is taken on Fedora 16 + KDE + gtk3-3.6.4. Basically all handles are implemented (except TStatusBar, TTrayIcon, TSplitter and TPopupMenu(main menu works)) ,but of course most of