Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Hi Philip
Something off-topic that I noticed about you previous emails. I
believe you are using MS Outlook for sending email. I highly
recommend you change you default email format from the Microsoft
proprietary TNEF (RichText) format to HTML or even better Plain Te
On 4/18/07, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is not true. I have never had blank messages from Philip. I am using
Thunderbird on windows. I guess Thunderbird is smart enough to read that mail
format.
Ok, their are a select few email clients that can read TNEF format,
but it i
On 18/04/07, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/18/07, Lee Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That may be my mistake then Christian. I thought I read that somewhere,
> I've never tried it. Nonetheless, that is good news.
What doesn´t work on Free Pascal is creating a
Hi,
The win32 widgetset can be used (with more or less success) on several windows
versions, starting from windows 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, XP 64, Vista 64 bits.
Because Microsoft has done such a good job with the 64 port of the 32 bit winapi to
64 bits and the fpc windows unit abstracts rem
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> The win32 widgetset can be used (with more or less success) on several
> windows versions, starting from windows 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, XP 64,
> Vista 64 bits.
>
> Because Microsoft has done such a good job with the 64 port of the 32
> bit winapi to 64 bits
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Vincent Snijders schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The win32 widgetset can be used (with more or less success) on several
> > windows versions, starting from windows 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, XP 64,
> > Vista 64 bits.
> >
> > Because Microsoft has done suc
Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 1:26:42 PM, Vincent wrote:
VS> The only one I can think of is just "win", but that might be a bit short.
'win' is not shorter than 'gtk', and even 33% longer than 'qt' :-)
Maybe 'mswin'? Or 'msw', like wxWidgets abbreviate Windows stuff.
--
Best regards,
Sergei
___
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
Hi,
The win32 widgetset can be used (with more or less success) on several
windows versions, starting from windows 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, XP 64,
Vista 64 bits.
Because Microsoft has done suc
On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or maybe WinGDI ?
>
> Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
Good one
I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even better might be 'GDI' on
it's own. I don't know of any other platform that has a GDI library
other than Windows. Als
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
The only one I can think of is just "win", but that might be a bit short.
winX ?
rgds
tiziano
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or maybe WinGDI ?
>
> Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
Good one
I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even better might be 'GDI' on
it's own. I don't know of any other platform that has a GDI libr
Lee Jenkins ha scritto:
Flávio Etrusco wrote:
2) Delphi Form has a Bitmap property which allows to set a background
image on the form, while Lazarus does not.
What version is it?
I vaguely remember seeing this on a very recent version of Delphi
(probably Turbo Delphi Explorer), but in Delphi7
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 07:44:03PM +0100, Steven Graham wrote:
> I have a program that I've made with lazaus which in the main form is a
> Toolbar and a some menus, the menu items and toolbar buttons are all
> setup with actions in an action list. The trouble I'm finding is that if
> they have b
* Graeme Geldenhuys wrote, On 18/04/07 11:15:
> On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Or maybe WinGDI ?
>> >
>> > Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
>>
>> Good one
>
> I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even better might be 'GDI' on
> it's own. I don't know of a
I have been sending in "Plain Text".
I've always had Outlook set to "Convert to HTML format".
A brief reading of the link you included seems to indicate that TNEF only
involves attachments.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Graeme Geldenhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 4/18/07, Lee Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That may be my mistake then Christian. I thought I read that somewhere,
I've never tried it. Nonetheless, that is good news.
What doesn´t work on Free Pascal is creating a dll that exports
classes, like for
Sam Liddicott wrote:
* Graeme Geldenhuys wrote, On 18/04/07 11:15:
On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or maybe WinGDI ?
Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
Good one
I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even better might be 'GDI' on
it's own. I don't know of any
On 4/18/07, Hess, Philip J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been sending in "Plain Text".
I've always had Outlook set to "Convert to HTML format".
That's weird. Yeah, your last email didn't have a winmail.dat
file attached and viewing the message source it shows text/html as the
format.
Tiziano_mk wrote:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
The only one I can think of is just "win", but that might be a bit short.
winX ?
It is no X
Marc
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" a
Marc Weustink schrieb:
> Sam Liddicott wrote:
>> * Graeme Geldenhuys wrote, On 18/04/07 11:15:
>>> On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
> Or maybe WinGDI ?
>
> Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
Good one
>>> I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even
On 4/18/07, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it really gdi only? I guess you use at least gdi+
GDI sounds also some old fashined to me.
I'm no low level Windows expert, but isn't GDI+ only Win2000 (or was
that WinXP) and later? Also I thought GDI+ was just a few extensions
(ext
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The win32 widgetset can be used (with more or less success) on several
> windows versions, starting from windows 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, XP
> 64, Vista 64 bits.
>
> Because Microsoft has done such a good job with the 64 port of the 32
> bit winapi to 64 bits and
I would vote for gdi or winapi
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Marc Weustink schrieb:
Sam Liddicott wrote:
* Graeme Geldenhuys wrote, On 18/04/07 11:15:
On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or maybe WinGDI ?
Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
Good one
I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even better
Marc Weustink schrieb:
>>> If we don't use GDI, we need another widgetset anyhow, so win would not
>>> fit there.
>>
>> Is it really gdi only? I guess you use at least gdi+
>
> IIRC lazarus doens't use gdi+ api calls.
Still, I think wingdi sounds old fashioned ;)
Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 6:05:19 PM, Graeme wrote:
GG> On 4/18/07, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Is it really gdi only? I guess you use at least gdi+
>> GDI sounds also some old fashined to me.
>>
GG> I'm no low level Windows expert, but isn't GDI+ only Win2000 (or was
GG> t
On 18/04/07, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would vote for gdi or winapi
i'd vote for winapi, since the gdi is not the widget set and lazarus
doesn't call it directly (?).
henry
_
To unsubscribe: ma
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 07:44:03PM +0100, Steven Graham wrote:
I have a program that I've made with lazaus which in the main form is a
Toolbar and a some menus, the menu items and toolbar buttons are all
setup with actions in an action list. The trouble I'm finding
Damn incorrect Reply-To headers.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Apr 18, 2007 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] New name for the win32 widget set?
To: Sergei Gorelkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 4/18/07, Sergei Gorelkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just opened my platform sdk and looked at list of technologies. We are
using at least: common controls, gdi, shell (maybe smth other). So GDI
cant describe all win32 widgetset. For me win32_64 is better.
Paul.
_
To unsubscribe
If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the files:
winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subjec
I also think winapi best describes what it is.
Paul
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 4:00 pm, Henry Vermaak wrote:
> On 18/04/07, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would vote for gdi or winapi
>
> i'd vote for winapi, since the gdi is not the widget set and lazarus
> does
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
>> The TNEF format can only be read by MS Outlook, not even Outlook
>> Express can read it. For all other mail clients, they will only see a
>> WinMail.dat attachment and a blank message body.
>
> This is not true. I have never had blank messag
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the files:
> winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
>
Still winapi seems most appropriate.
mswindows?
Andrew
_
To unsubscribe: m
Steven Graham wrote:
> h that's interesting. I've done some extra testing with this and the
> error in the other post is when the screen colour depth is at 8-bit, 256
> colours. When set to 16-bit colour, the program runs but the bitmaps
> don't show. This is interesting as they are only 16 col
Micha Nelissen wrote:
8-bit needs palette support which we don't have. Since almost no one
needs it, it's unlikely to be implemented.
Micha
I see!! right, that explains the error in 8 bit. Is a shame as I run a
lot of my old machines in 8-bit in order to run them at my LCD's native
1280x1
Steven Graham wrote:
> I see!! right, that explains the error in 8 bit. Is a shame as I run a
> lot of my old machines in 8-bit in order to run them at my LCD's native
> 1280x1024.
>
> right, so why are the bitmaps not being shown on 16-bit colour? could it
> me the comctrl?
Could be, what versio
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:19:39 -0400
Andrew Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> > If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the
> > files: winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
It's the right name. They map LCL winapi like calls to the winapi.
Micha Nelissen wrote:
Could be, what version of Internet Explorer do you have ? Can you
upgrade it ?
The Win98 SE machines have IE 5.0, on 95 so far I've used IE 3. I could
try to upgrade the machines
_
To unsubscribe: mai
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:19:39 -0400
Andrew Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the
files: winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
It's the right name. They map LCL winapi like ca
Marc Weustink schreef:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:19:39 -0400
Andrew Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the
files: winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
It's the right name. The
To my mind, "win32" does not suggest so much 32 bits as it does the set
of functions introduced with Windows 95. The difference between win32
and win16 is chiefly the additional functions, not so much the 32 vs 16
bits. win32 is the same set of functions that is being called by the
win32 widgetset
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Marc Weustink schreef:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:19:39 -0400
Andrew Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the
files: winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the line of WinCE it would then be Win or Win3264 or win32_64
Yes, but we could also think that wince is actually called winceapi,
only shortened =)
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
8-bit needs palette support which we don't have. Since almost no one
needs it, it's unlikely to be implemented.
Micha
Out of curiosity, what is needed for palette support? A couple of years ago
I implemented some classes that implement color quantization,
dithering and so on. They are part o
Steven Graham wrote:
> Micha Nelissen wrote:
>>
>> Could be, what version of Internet Explorer do you have ? Can you
>> upgrade it ?
>>
> The Win98 SE machines have IE 5.0, on 95 so far I've used IE 3. I could
> try to upgrade the machines
IE 3 could well be too old. Try using at least IE 4.0.
Micha Nelissen wrote:
IE 3 could well be too old. Try using at least IE 4.0. IIRC, even
(early) Borland Delphi/BCB TToolBar wouldn't work properly on Win95/IE3 :-).
Micha
I've now tried with IE 5.5 SP2 and the bitmaps still aren't being displayed.
__
On 4/18/07, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> right, so why are the bitmaps not being shown on 16-bit colour? could it
> me the comctrl?
Could be, what version of Internet Explorer do you have ? Can you
upgrade it ?
This is why I love it when they sue Microsoft for unfair business
Giulio Bernardi wrote:
8-bit needs palette support which we don't have. Since almost no one
needs it, it's unlikely to be implemented.
Micha
Out of curiosity, what is needed for palette support? A couple of years
ago I implemented some classes that implement color quantization,
dithering an
Steven Graham wrote:
> I've now tried with IE 5.5 SP2 and the bitmaps still aren't being
> displayed.
Ok right, need some more info then. FPC version ? Lazarus version ? Do
you have a simple test app to reproduce ? And/or refer me to a bug
report, please.
Micha
__
Can anybody tell me about possible vector graphic component (capability to
read,
write and show svf or cgm file format)??? In linux box, of course...
Trevisani
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
51 matches
Mail list logo
