Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit??? release 0.5

2007-08-20 Thread David Lyon
Marco van de Voort wrote: What I think we should devise or adapt is something a bit similar to the python/perl library model. What exactly is that model? Triple the average linux packaging system size by sticking every unit into a separate installable package and provide of a web of

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit??? release 0.5

2007-08-20 Thread David Lyon
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: - fpc/lazarus uses these library files just as it would internal functions... That is impossible. (or you use internal functions entirely the wrong way). Why impossible ? At compile time, the compiler could decide whether the function is

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit??? release 0.5

2007-08-20 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:42:26PM +1000, David Lyon wrote: The model is that you download the source you need and compile it into your own system. That's no problem, and already the case. Define load. Also keep in mind that Perl installs interpreter sourcecode, what exactly do you imagine

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit??? release 0.5

2007-08-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, David Lyon wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: - fpc/lazarus uses these library files just as it would internal functions... That is impossible. (or you use internal functions entirely the wrong way). Why

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit??? release 0.5

2007-08-20 Thread David Lyon
Marco van de Voort wrote: Define load. Also keep in mind that Perl installs interpreter sourcecode, what exactly do you imagine for FPC? compiled libs, source? How do you deal with versioning? Right. That's what perl does. We should do the same thing. Then compile it into a library

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit??? release 0.5

2007-08-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, David Lyon wrote: Marco van de Voort wrote: Define load. Also keep in mind that Perl installs interpreter sourcecode, what exactly do you imagine for FPC? compiled libs, source? How do you deal with versioning? Right. That's what perl does.

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit??? release 0.5

2007-08-19 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 10:08:57AM +1000, David Lyon wrote: When the ToDos are solved the IDE can be extended. I added a few links to FPC wiki sites there. Well, I have had a think about this library issue a bit further. What I think we should devise or adapt is something a bit

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit??? release 0.5

2007-08-18 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:10:46AM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:46:46 +1000 David Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Darius, Darius Blaszijk wrote: [...] 2) Lazarus only supports static packages. So installing a package would always require to recompile

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit??? release 0.5

2007-08-18 Thread David Lyon
Marco van de Voort wrote: Darius Blaszijk wrote: [...] 2) Lazarus only supports static packages. So installing a package would always require to recompile Lazarus. I have no idea what the progress on this topic is. Perhaps the wiki has something on it, or someone from core can comment.

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit” release 0.5

2007-08-16 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:46:46 +1000 David Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Darius, Darius Blaszijk wrote: [...] 2) Lazarus only supports static packages. So installing a package would always require to recompile Lazarus. I have no idea what the progress on this topic is. Perhaps the

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit” release 0.5

2007-08-16 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, David Lyon wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: As far as I'm concerned, this is an absolute must for inclusion in Lazarus by default. It would ensure that lazarus covers all areas of modern development. (if such a thing exists...) When I made my modern comment, I

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit” release 0.5

2007-08-15 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote: Dear Lazarus users, Web Service Toolkit is a web services package for FPC, Lazarus and Delphi; Web Service Toolkit is meant to ease web services consumption and creation by FPC, Lazarus and Delphi users. I updated from SVN and compiled

RE: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit release 0.5

2007-08-15 Thread Hess, Philip J
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Van Canneyt Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 3:34 AM To: lazarus@miraclec.com Subject: Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit release 0.5 On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote: Dear Lazarus users, Web Service Toolkit is a web services

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit” release 0.5

2007-08-15 Thread David Lyon
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: As far as I'm concerned, this is an absolute must for inclusion in Lazarus by default. It would ensure that lazarus covers all areas of modern development. (if such a thing exists...) When I made my modern comment, I actually meant it with students in mind. Who

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit” release 0.5

2007-08-15 Thread Darius Blaszijk
David Lyon wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: As far as I'm concerned, this is an absolute must for inclusion in Lazarus by default. It would ensure that lazarus covers all areas of modern development. (if such a thing exists...) When I made my modern comment, I actually meant it with

Re: [lazarus] Web Service Toolkit” release 0.5

2007-08-15 Thread David Lyon
Hi Darius, Darius Blaszijk wrote: 1) package management is currently being developed under FPC (see fppkg and fpmkunit and http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPMake). It will consist of a repository with downloadable packages for FPC. This could be extended easily in the near future for Lazarus. But

[lazarus] Web Service Toolkit” release 0.5

2007-08-14 Thread Inoussa OUEDRAOGO
Dear Lazarus users, Web Service Toolkit is a web services package for FPC, Lazarus and Delphi; Web Service Toolkit is meant to ease web services consumption and creation by FPC, Lazarus and Delphi users. Features : - client and server development - services as standalone EXE or dynamic libraries