At 01:55 PM 11/3/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>Discussions of theory are nice, but they need to be grounded in the facts.
>Here are some facts.
>
>At 12:02 PM 11/3/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> >High-capacity File Server
> >http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751
> >ftp://
Discussions of theory are nice, but they need to be grounded in the facts.
Here are some facts.
At 12:02 PM 11/3/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>High-capacity File Server
>http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751
>ftp://download.sourceforge.net/pub/sourceforge/leaf/
I can connec
At 01:16 PM 11/3/00 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
...
>Unless I'm mistaken, the FTP protocol has nothing whatsoever to do
>with mime-types, et al - only "ascii" or "bin" - and this only to do
>carriage-return conversions.
>
>Mime-types, I believe, are only present in HTTP downloads, which is
>wh
What IE does is documented. You just have to dig a little to find it.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/networking/moniker/overview/appendix_a.asp
At 10:55 AM 11/03/2000 -0800, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>Netscape trusts the accuracy the mime type reported by the Web server.
>Period. If it is wrong,
At 01:16 PM 11/3/00 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>On 3 Nov 2000, at 10:55, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>
> > At 01:16 PM 11/3/00 -0500, Rick Onanian wrote:
>
> > >However, it would be important to know how web browsers choose
> > >binary or ASCII for FTPing. I would guess that they do it
> > >based on th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> no, they trust the server's mime.types config file.
>
> the web admin, should add the 'img' extension/string to the
> 'application/octet-stream' entry on the mime.types
Please, people, while in this discussion, keep in mind that
we're talking about FTP, not HTTP.
Look
At 01:05 PM 11/3/00 -0500, Rick Onanian wrote:
>Eiger source has completed uploading
>to ftp://download.sourceforge.net/incoming.
Unfortunately, it looks like those uploads killed the server. I haven't
been able to release any files since they were uploaded. :(
Would someone with Leaf project ad
this seems like a feature that leaf should incorporate, to face comercial
routers that alow this type of redundancy.
comments???
pedro
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 7:14 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PR
On 3 Nov 2000, at 10:55, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> At 01:16 PM 11/3/00 -0500, Rick Onanian wrote:
> >However, it would be important to know how web browsers choose
> >binary or ASCII for FTPing. I would guess that they do it
> >based on their own mime-type list.
>
> This has been discussed again a
It looks like this conversation may be moot. I just ran into a limitation
of the Anonymous FTP directory. Apparently, you can't chown a directory
once created, and only the person that creates the dir has write privileges.
I deleted the eigerstein and oxygen directories I created.
David and Ch
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Onanian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 6:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Anonymous FTP
>
>
> Ray Olszewski wrote:
> > >Until proven otherwise, I would assume the default ftp
> download would be
>
Ray Olszewski wrote:
> >However, it would be important to know how web browsers choose
> >binary or ASCII for FTPing. I would guess that they do it
> >based on their own mime-type list.
>
> This has been discussed again and again back on the LRP list. Neither of the
> major browsers does what you
On 3 Nov 2000, at 10:19, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> At 11:52 AM 11/3/00 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
> >Another question: if I take module X from system X with kernel A, and
> >move module X to system Z with kernel A (same version kernel), is
> >this going to work assuming that system X and system
At 01:31 PM 11/3/00 -0500, Rick Onanian wrote:
>Can we please have Reply-to munging on? I just sent this to the LRP
>list...force of habit, automatic pilot, absent-mindedness, whatever...
Done. I may change it back though. It depends on possible solutions to the
member_posting_only=yes problem.
At 01:16 PM 11/3/00 -0500, Rick Onanian wrote:
...
>
>Web browsers are not good FTP clients.
True. But when you offer the ftp site from a Web-based link, you have to
anticipate that they will often be used to access the ftp site and take
account of their limitations.
Whether you like them or not
Can we please have Reply-to munging on? I just sent this to the LRP
list...force of habit, automatic pilot, absent-mindedness, whatever...
Ray Olszewski wrote:
> Just to be clear, Rick ... my experience compiling kernels (pretty much
> limited to 2.0.36, 2.2.13, and 2.2.17 ... but I can't imagin
At 10:25 AM 11/3/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>At 09:53 AM 11/3/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>...
> >
> >Until proven otherwise, I would assume the default ftp download would
> >be binary. This may bite me later.
>
>It's already "bit" us, I think.
>
>Isn't my report from yesterday a valid counter
On 3 Nov 2000, at 10:05, Mike Noyes wrote:
> At 11:36 AM 11/3/00 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
> >The correct Oxygen release is September 2000, not "2000" - there's
> >two months left :)
>
> Wasn't the last Oyxgen release Oct 25 2000? At the rate you're
> updating Oxygen, I thought it best to use
> Charles,
> I'm glad to see you arrived safely. When you have time (no rush) would you
> move your files on the leaf site from:
> /home/groups/leaf/htdocs/addons/images
> to:
> /home/groups/ftp/pub/leaf/eigerstein/
>
> I'd like to save the 100MB were allowed for the web site. Thanks.
Will do...I
Ray Olszewski wrote:
> >Until proven otherwise, I would assume the default ftp download would be
> >binary. This may bite me later.
>
> It's already "bit" us, I think.
>
> Isn't my report from yesterday a valid counter-example to your assumption?
> Surely Sourceforge didn't *explicitly* make the
At 01:04 PM 11/3/00 -0500, Rick Onanian wrote:
...
>Kernel modules are more flexible than we give them credit for.
>
>If you compile 2.2.16 kernels on five machines, each with their
>own configurations and each compiling different modules, then
>the modules compiled on one are very likely to work
Eiger source has completed uploading
to ftp://download.sourceforge.net/incoming.
--
rick -- A mind is like a parachute... it only works when it's open.
ICQ# 1590117 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
Help with LRP: lrp.c0wz.com 68 Camaro wanted: dingo.mcrnet.net
Windows u
At 09:53 AM 11/3/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
...
>
>Until proven otherwise, I would assume the default ftp download would be
>binary. This may bite me later.
It's already "bit" us, I think.
Isn't my report from yesterday a valid counter-example to your assumption?
Surely Sourceforge didn't *exp
David Douthitt wrote:
> Another question: if I take module X from system X with kernel A, and
> move module X to system Z with kernel A (same version kernel), is
> this going to work assuming that system X and system Z are binary-
> compatible?
Kernel modules are more flexible than we give them c
At 11:52 AM 11/3/00 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>On 3 Nov 2000, at 9:27, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>
>> Or possibly the modules should just be in with the kernel, all in a
>> single tarball ...
>
>This is the way the LRP kernels were bundled; despite the large size,
>I appreciated it since all the m
At 11:36 AM 11/3/00 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>The correct Oxygen release is September 2000, not "2000" - there's
>two months left :)
Wasn't the last Oyxgen release Oct 25 2000? At the rate you're updating
Oxygen, I thought it best to use the year only (BAD e.g. Windows 2000).
This will allo
At 09:27 AM 11/3/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>At 08:51 AM 11/3/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >At 07:59 AM 11/3/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >>I just created Anonymous FTP directories for eigerstein and oxygen.
> >>
> >>ftp://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/leaf/
> >
> >Should we create kernel and mod
On 3 Nov 2000, at 9:27, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> Or possibly the modules should just be in with the kernel, all in a
> single tarball ...
This is the way the LRP kernels were bundled; despite the large size,
I appreciated it since all the modules were included with the Linux
kernel - no mistaki
The correct Oxygen release is September 2000, not "2000" - there's
two months left :)
--
David Douthitt
UNIX Systems Administrator
HP-UX, Linux, Unixware
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mail
At 08:51 AM 11/3/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>At 07:59 AM 11/3/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>>I just created Anonymous FTP directories for eigerstein and oxygen.
>>
>>ftp://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/leaf/
>
>Should we create kernel and module directories in the Anonymous FTP area?
It might be bette
At 07:59 AM 11/3/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>I just created Anonymous FTP directories for eigerstein and oxygen.
>
>ftp://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/leaf/
Should we create kernel and module directories in the Anonymous FTP area?
--
Mike Noyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/projects/leaf
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Ok, but I was referring to the original upload that was released on the LRP
> SF site. You didn't flake, because this is the first request I sent for
> upload assistance.
No, really, I'm sure you asked me to do it again since the original
upload, after leaf started. Okay, anyw
At 10:45 AM 11/3/00 -0500, Rick Onanian wrote:
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> > Rick,
> > I hate to ask you to do this again, but would you upload the source
> > for Eiger to download.sourceforge.net?
>
>Don't hate asking me to do it again..sometimes I flake and you
>have to remind me. That goes for everyon
At 09:55 AM 11/3/00 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>In the current list context, is there going to be a package
>repository on the LEAF ftp?
David,
You now have a ftp directory to do with as you please at:
ftp://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/leaf/oxygen/
--
Mike Noyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourcefo
On 3 Nov 2000, at 9:07, Rick Onanian wrote:
> David Douthitt wrote:
> > On 2 Nov 2000, at 15:24, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >
> > > Are the packages in lrp.c0wz.com/files/packages/ddout/incoming
> > > directory ready for prime time?
> >
> > As far as I know. I didn't put them there :)
>
> Hey, I did
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Rick,
> I hate to ask you to do this again, but would you upload the source for
> Eiger to download.sourceforge.net?
Don't hate asking me to do it again..sometimes I flake and you
have to remind me. That goes for everyone who asks me to do
things...if it doesn't get done promp
I just created Anonymous FTP directories for eigerstein and oxygen.
ftp://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/leaf/
David & Charles,
Please follow the instructions here to upload files:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=792&group_id=1
--
Mike Noyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.ne
I've made it to Texas, and am back online (with a full T1, but I have to
share it with a bunch of other folks :< ) I'm fairly busy, but I'll try to
at least read all the list mail. Expect a reduced number of responses,
however.
Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steink
Mike Noyes wrote:
> We discussed this possibility when the problem came up on the LRP SF site.
> I didn't try to upload a .htaccess file to download.sourceforge.net, so it
> may work. For now I'm just going to upload the files again with the .bin
> extension. It's a more consistent way to designat
At 09:02 AM 11/3/00 -0500, Rick Onanian wrote:
>You may be able to modify, for our directories, the mime-types
>using a .htaccess file.
We discussed this possibility when the problem came up on the LRP SF site.
I didn't try to upload a .htaccess file to download.sourceforge.net, so it
may work.
David Douthitt wrote:
> On 2 Nov 2000, at 15:24, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> > Are the packages in lrp.c0wz.com/files/packages/ddout/incoming
> > directory ready for prime time?
>
> As far as I know. I didn't put them there :)
Hey, I didn't make 'em. ;)
> I think Rick got tired of trying to keep up
Ray Olszewski wrote:
> 1. The extension .ima (as in Oxygen_2000_img_extras.ima) is not recognized
> by the Sourceforge Web server as binary; neither is .img (as in
> EigerStein_contrib_img_pppoe-beta0.2.img). In both instance, my Netscape on
> Windows tries to display it as text. You might want to
On 2 Nov 2000, at 17:56, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Why don't you setup a directory on the Leaf Anoymous FTP directory
> for your packages. Charles was able to rsync his files to the Leaf
> site real quick.
How do I do that?
--
David Douthitt
UNIX Systems Administrator
HP-UX, Linux, Unixware
[EMAIL
At 02:59 PM 11/2/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>Mike -- A couple of details.
>
>1. The extension .ima (as in Oxygen_2000_img_extras.ima) is not recognized
>by the Sourceforge Web server as binary; neither is .img (as in
>EigerStein_contrib_img_pppoe-beta0.2.img). In both instance, my Netscape
I'm doing something simple on 3dstudio max3, just the LEAF 'word' with the
description beneath and the 'the internet leaf and you' above.
but I've asked a friend of mine who's an artist, to draw an adequate tux for
leaf!!!
during this weekend I hope to post something.
but I'll have something ve
Everyone,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
now available.
--
Mike Noyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/projects/leaf
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel
46 matches
Mail list logo
