At 10:35 28-11-2000 -0600, you wrote:
>On 24 Nov 2000, at 21:56, Pedro Barreto wrote:
>
> > no really, I was talking about tables, div's, span's, css, a
> > single css file, etc..
>
>Can we keep the web page Lynx-friendly? There are many who depend on
>programs like Lynx (especially the blind).
G'day all,
my 2c, from a lurker.
Quoting Charles Steinkuehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > David, Do you agree with Charles? Should we put the scripts on CVS,
> > > or do you have another idea?
> >
> > I'm not sure what you all mean by "the scripts." As Charles noted, I
[...]
> > Are these the s
> Hello all
> don't be to happy yet :(
>
> I did find out a few things to patch the kernel but now i am stuck.
> the one change i adapted wass __initfunc -> __init
> and the kernel commandline parameters can now be put in the
> different routines with
> routine_setup
> [
> definition
> ]
> __setu
Hello all
don't be to happy yet :(
I did find out a few things to patch the kernel but now i am stuck.
the one change i adapted wass __initfunc -> __init
and the kernel commandline parameters can now be put in the
different routines with
routine_setup
[
definition
]
__setup ("whatever=", rout
> > David, Do you agree with Charles? Should we put the scripts on CVS,
> > or do you have another idea?
>
> I'm not sure what you all mean by "the scripts." As Charles noted, I
> completely and ruthlessly revamped /linuxrc and everything on down.
> For me, that means /linuxrc and everything in /
At 11:34 AM 11/28/00 -0500, Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > no really, I was talking about tables, div's, span's, css, a
> > > single css file, etc..
> >
> > Can we keep the web page Lynx-friendly? There are many who depend on
> > programs
On 27 Nov 2000, at 12:03, Mike Noyes wrote:
> David, Do you agree with Charles? Should we put the scripts on CVS,
> or do you have another idea?
I'm not sure what you all mean by "the scripts." As Charles noted, I
completely and ruthlessly revamped /linuxrc and everything on down.
For me, t
David Douthitt wrote:
>
> On 25 Nov 2000, at 17:06, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>
> > Most of us are talking, or at least thinking about, moving to
> > kernel 2.4.x [...]
>
> Anyone going to switch the firewalls to netfilter?
I would like to, i am at the moment porting
my LRP to Glibc 2.1. i have a
David Douthitt wrote:
> > Most of us are talking, or at least thinking about, moving to
> > kernel 2.4.x [...]
>
> Anyone going to switch the firewalls to netfilter?
Want to give us a link?
> --
> David Douthitt
> UNIX Systems Administrator
> HP-UX, Linux, Unixware
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
rick
David Douthitt wrote:
> > no really, I was talking about tables, div's, span's, css, a
> > single css file, etc..
>
> Can we keep the web page Lynx-friendly? There are many who depend on
> programs like Lynx (especially the blind). Lynx is also present in
> almost every Linux installation - and
On 25 Nov 2000, at 17:06, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> Most of us are talking, or at least thinking about, moving to
> kernel 2.4.x [...]
Anyone going to switch the firewalls to netfilter?
--
David Douthitt
UNIX Systems Administrator
HP-UX, Linux, Unixware
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On 24 Nov 2000, at 21:56, Pedro Barreto wrote:
> no really, I was talking about tables, div's, span's, css, a
> single css file, etc..
Can we keep the web page Lynx-friendly? There are many who depend on
programs like Lynx (especially the blind). Lynx is also present in
almost every Linux i
12 matches
Mail list logo
