On Thursday 28 February 2002 00:45, Mike Noyes wrote:
> This is where we disagree. I believe this is a single project with
> many releases/branches. ref.
This I agree with, w/o necessarily heading in the same exact direction.
>>D Douthitt wrote:
> >I'd like to see each distro get:
> >
> >* F
David Douthitt, 2002-02-27 23:07 -0600
>On 2/27/02 at 4:28 PM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
> > The last consideration is licensing. David is using the
> > MIT license, and everyone else is using GPL. From what I
> > understand reading the iBiblio licensing page, only one
> > license i
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 23:07, David Douthitt wrote:
> On 2/27/02 at 4:28 PM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > The last consideration is licensing. David is using the
> > MIT license, and everyone else is using GPL. From what I
> > understand reading the iBiblio licensing page,
At 2002-02-27 20:55 -0800, Mike Sensney wrote:
>I think you are confusing small applications with distributions.
Mike,
Apparently I did. Do you happen to know where the application/requirement
information is for a Linux Distribution repository?
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sourcefor
On 2/27/02 at 10:50 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> David,
> I've done some homework, and discovered the following
> things: SF lists.sf.net server uses Mailman 2.0.5, and
> Python 2.1.1. Mailman uses the Python re module to parse
> regex in Privacy Options - Hold posts.
>
> I believ
On 2/27/02 at 4:28 PM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The last consideration is licensing. David is using the
> MIT license, and everyone else is using GPL. From what I
> understand reading the iBiblio licensing page, only one
> license is allowed per repository.
Sounds like I'm the odd
On 2/27/02 at 4:28 PM, Serge Caron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello David,
Hello!
> You are working under the premise that a file has one and
> only one package of residence. Please note that this is an
> observation and not a value judgment of any kind: AFAIK,
> there is nothing wrong with t
I think you are confusing small applications with distributions. Look at
the
page for /public/ftp/pub/Linux/apps/appliance:
http://ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/appliance/!INDEX.html.;
Each entry consists of tarball, LSM, date and a short description.
On the other hand, I think you will notice that
> I'm currently in a Watchguard training. I'm going to make the WCP
> Certificate.
>
> The trainer told me, that the "Drop-In configuration" (ProxyARP DMZ) is
less
> secure than the routed DMZ. I didn't say anything and thought "Uh, really?
> Why?".
Good for you!
> Is a ProxyARP DMZ less secure
Hi Charles, hi all
> > I'm currently in a Watchguard training. I'm going to make the WCP
> > Certificate.
> >
> > The trainer told me, that the "Drop-In configuration" (ProxyARP DMZ) is
> less
> > secure than the routed DMZ. I didn't say anything and thought
> "Uh, really?
> > Why?".
>
> Good for
At 2002-02-27 16:28 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>At 2002-02-27 10:45 -0800, Mike Sensney wrote:
>>Storage of large files including CD images don't seem to be an issue.
>
>>I suggest that Ibiblio is a much better repository for our files than SF.
>
>It may be, but will everyone agree to the naming con
At 2002-02-27 10:45 -0800, Mike Sensney wrote:
>At 06:41 AM 2/27/2002 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>>BTW, our released files are already on Ibiblio.org as part of the SF
>>mirrors. A link to the SF mirror is on the ibiblio.org home page in the
>>first right box labeled "Sourceforge ftp mirror".
>>
>
At 06:41 AM 2/27/2002 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>At 2002-02-26 23:16 -0800, Steven Peck wrote:
>>Well, that may be a way around the storage limits I have seen message
>>threads about that we are running up against on SF.
>BTW, our released files are already on Ibiblio.org as part of the SF
>mi
> > > The trainer told me, that the "Drop-In configuration" (ProxyARP DMZ)
is
> > less
> > > secure than the routed DMZ. I didn't say anything and thought
> > "Uh, really?
> > > Why?".
> >
> > Good for you!
>
> Good for me that I didn't say anything or good for me that I'm going to
make
> the WCP?
At 2002-02-27 20:22 +0100, KP Kirchdörfer wrote:
>Am Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2002 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes:
>
> > Also, note files that are >10MB should not reside on the shell
> > server. I would greatly appreciate it if everyone started moving
> > their files into their personal tree in cvs ASAP.
At 2002-02-19 22:25 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>On 2/19/02 at 6:25 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > OT: regexp question
> > BTW, is it possible to use a not bracket expression
> > against a string?
> > Here is an example that doesn't work. :-(
> >
> > 'Content-Type: .*[^\(plain\|si
Am Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2002 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> Also, note files that are >10MB should not reside on the shell
> server. I would greatly appreciate it if everyone started moving
> their files into their personal tree in cvs ASAP. Thanks.
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/
Hi Charles, hi all
> Good for you that you question rather than simply believe...
Ahh.. OK :)
> > Unfortunately, you can't define in which chain rules go. (Watchguard
> > Fireboxes run on a highly modified kernel 2.0.38)
> > I don't know in which chain the organize their DMZ stuff.
> Ah...with
>Message: 1
>From: "Steven Peck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 23:06:57 -0800
>Subject: [Leaf-devel] Announcing leaf-project.org site name.
>
>Well folks,
>
>After Mike Sensney's suggestion and talking to Mike Noyes and Charles I
>decided to get the domain na
Hello David,
Sorry for the pause :-)
There is a picture that is becoming clearer and clearer from your posts. I
will quote your post slightly out of sequence to bring some focus to this:
-Original Message-
From: David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Serge Caron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; LEA
Hi Charles, hi all
> Good for you that you question rather than simply believe...
Ahh.. OK :)
> > Unfortunately, you can't define in which chain rules go. (Watchguard
> > Fireboxes run on a highly modified kernel 2.0.38)
> > I don't know in which chain the organize their DMZ stuff.
> Ah...with
Hi all
I'm currently in a Watchguard training. I'm going to make the WCP
Certificate.
The trainer told me, that the "Drop-In configuration" (ProxyARP DMZ) is less
secure than the routed DMZ. I didn't say anything and thought "Uh, really?
Why?".
Is a ProxyARP DMZ less secure than a routed or sta
At 2002-02-27 11:04 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > Suggestions and comments on the proposed change are welcome.
>
> > >I hope all has been going well for your projects lately -- has been
> > >a while since we've talked. As part of our periodic disk usage
> > >quota checks, we noticed that
> Suggestions and comments on the proposed change are welcome.
> >I hope all has been going well for your projects lately -- has been a
> >while since we've talked. As part of our periodic disk usage quota
> >checks, we noticed that leaf is once again using a fairly large chunk
> >of disk for di
Everyone,
I had hoped for some additional time, before we needed to address this
issue, but the situation has changed. We are once again over our quota on
the shell server (ref. forward from Jacob Moorman at the bottom of this
message). I'm proposing the following changes to our Individual Deve
At 2002-02-26 21:54 -0600, guitarlynn wrote:
>I'm coming to the point in the FAQ's that haven't been
>updated since around the inception of the LEAF site.
>My concern is with updating considering LRP 2.9.8
>is LRP now officially an old release, retired, or active
>as far as this site (LEAF) is
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 00:49, Jacques Nilo wrote:
> Changelog for beta4:
looks great, are there any plans to make that available on a CD for more
space ?
It try to access the documentation page, but I get unreachable.
Best regards,
Christophe
--
Christophe Zwecker
:Sysctl
27 matches
Mail list logo