Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 07:49, Eric Spakman wrote: > > http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/06/23/1728205&tid=150 > > This obligation is specified even more strongly in section 10 of > > the draft for the third version of the GPL, which specifically states that > > "downstream users" (thos

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Erich Titl
Mike Mike Noyes wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 07:23, Erich Titl wrote: >> Mike Noyes wrote: ... >> >> If you provide software to download the source then the link it points >> to _must_not_be_altered_. >> >> This is pretty sensible. > > Eric, > That's the way I understood things also (linking

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, >> >> If you provide software to download the source then the link it points >> to _must_not_be_altered_. >> >> This is pretty sensible. >> > > Eric, > That's the way I understood things also (linking to up-stream source was > permissible when distributing unmodified binaries), but DSL and

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 07:23, Erich Titl wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > My understanding of the new enforcement is if you distribute you must > > make source available. No more linking to up-stream source for > > compliance, when distributing unmodified binaries. :-( > > I read the interview with S

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Erich Titl
Mike Mike Noyes wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 23:13, Cédric Schieli wrote: >> A rapid scan of bering-uclibc src repo tells following apps have links to >> other repos rather than a local copy : >> >> apps/automake (ftp.gnu.org) >> apps/buildenv (ftp.gnu.org, ftp.gwdg.de, www.kernel.org) >> apps/l

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 00:45, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > We better ask Sourceforge stuff if we (and probably more projetcs) can add > the > kernel sources for every version of the last three years to their servers - I > guess they have to provide a seperate disk array for n copies of the kernel >

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Mike Noyes
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 23:13, Cédric Schieli wrote: > A rapid scan of bering-uclibc src repo tells following apps have links to > other repos rather than a local copy : > > apps/automake (ftp.gnu.org) > apps/buildenv (ftp.gnu.org, ftp.gwdg.de, www.kernel.org) > apps/linux (www.de.kernel.org) > apps

Re: [leaf-devel] beckup menu disappered

2006-06-30 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Andrea, >Hi all, > >I have recently rebuilt the leaf bering "base" package (yesterday 29 >june), to test some modifications I did to the bristuff/asterisk >package, and see if all go nicely with the new uclibc buildenv recently >commited. > >Well, when I go to the backup menu of this box,

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Erich Titl
KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 08:13 schrieb Cédric Schieli: .. > > We better ask Sourceforge stuff if we (and probably more projetcs) can add > the > kernel sources for every version of the last three years to their servers - I > guess they have to provide a seperate disk

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 08:13 schrieb Cédric Schieli: > Hello list, > > > A rapid scan of bering-uclibc src repo tells following apps have links to > other repos rather than a local copy : > > apps/automake (ftp.gnu.org) > apps/buildenv (ftp.gnu.org, ftp.gwdg.de, www.kernel.org) > apps/linux (www

Re: [leaf-devel] beckup menu disappered

2006-06-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 09:22 schrieb Andrea Fino: > Hi all, > > I have recently rebuilt the leaf bering "base" package (yesterday 29 > june), to test some modifications I did to the bristuff/asterisk > package, and see if all go nicely with the new uclibc buildenv recently > commited. > > Well,

[leaf-devel] beckup menu disappered

2006-06-30 Thread Andrea Fino
Hi all, I have recently rebuilt the leaf bering "base" package (yesterday 29 june), to test some modifications I did to the bristuff/asterisk package, and see if all go nicely with the new uclibc buildenv recently commited. Well, when I go to the backup menu of this box, I got: cat: /var/lib/