Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Cédric Schieli
Hello list, A rapid scan of bering-uclibc src repo tells following apps have links to other repos rather than a local copy : apps/automake (ftp.gnu.org) apps/buildenv (ftp.gnu.org, ftp.gwdg.de, www.kernel.org) apps/linux (www.de.kernel.org) apps/openssl (www.openssl.org) apps/syslinux

[leaf-devel] beckup menu disappered

2006-06-30 Thread Andrea Fino
Hi all, I have recently rebuilt the leaf bering base package (yesterday 29 june), to test some modifications I did to the bristuff/asterisk package, and see if all go nicely with the new uclibc buildenv recently commited. Well, when I go to the backup menu of this box, I got: cat:

Re: [leaf-devel] beckup menu disappered

2006-06-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 09:22 schrieb Andrea Fino: Hi all, I have recently rebuilt the leaf bering base package (yesterday 29 june), to test some modifications I did to the bristuff/asterisk package, and see if all go nicely with the new uclibc buildenv recently commited. Well, when I go

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 08:13 schrieb Cédric Schieli: Hello list, A rapid scan of bering-uclibc src repo tells following apps have links to other repos rather than a local copy : apps/automake (ftp.gnu.org) apps/buildenv (ftp.gnu.org, ftp.gwdg.de, www.kernel.org) apps/linux

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Erich Titl
KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 08:13 schrieb Cédric Schieli: .. We better ask Sourceforge stuff if we (and probably more projetcs) can add the kernel sources for every version of the last three years to their servers - I guess they have to provide a seperate disk

Re: [leaf-devel] beckup menu disappered

2006-06-30 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Andrea, Hi all, I have recently rebuilt the leaf bering base package (yesterday 29 june), to test some modifications I did to the bristuff/asterisk package, and see if all go nicely with the new uclibc buildenv recently commited. Well, when I go to the backup menu of this box, I got:

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Mike Noyes
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 23:13, Cédric Schieli wrote: A rapid scan of bering-uclibc src repo tells following apps have links to other repos rather than a local copy : apps/automake (ftp.gnu.org) apps/buildenv (ftp.gnu.org, ftp.gwdg.de, www.kernel.org) apps/linux (www.de.kernel.org)

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 00:45, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: We better ask Sourceforge stuff if we (and probably more projetcs) can add the kernel sources for every version of the last three years to their servers - I guess they have to provide a seperate disk array for n copies of the kernel

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Erich Titl
Mike Mike Noyes wrote: On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 23:13, Cédric Schieli wrote: A rapid scan of bering-uclibc src repo tells following apps have links to other repos rather than a local copy : apps/automake (ftp.gnu.org) apps/buildenv (ftp.gnu.org, ftp.gwdg.de, www.kernel.org) apps/linux

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, If you provide software to download the source then the link it points to _must_not_be_altered_. This is pretty sensible. Eric, That's the way I understood things also (linking to up-stream source was permissible when distributing unmodified binaries), but DSL and MEPIS were

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Erich Titl
Mike Mike Noyes wrote: On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 07:23, Erich Titl wrote: Mike Noyes wrote: ... If you provide software to download the source then the link it points to _must_not_be_altered_. This is pretty sensible. Eric, That's the way I understood things also (linking to up-stream

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 07:49, Eric Spakman wrote: http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/06/23/1728205tid=150 This obligation is specified even more strongly in section 10 of the draft for the third version of the GPL, which specifically states that downstream users (those who,