Re: [leaf-devel] Ports to Non-x86 Platforms?

2003-03-24 Thread Spiro Philopoulos
This might not be what you were refering to but Amino Communications (http://www.aminocom.com) has some very small mini set-top boxes that use a PowerPC that can run Linux. Being set-top boxes they have the typical video-out & audio-out ports but they also have an Ethernet port. From what I've hear

Re: [leaf-devel] Ports to Non-x86 Platforms?

2003-03-22 Thread Lynn Avants
On Friday 21 March 2003 05:41 pm, David Douthitt wrote: > > One of my friends has added Linux > > to the Mac boot-menu that was considered impossible (until he did it). > > I don't know which boot menu you mean, but for several years there's > been a couple of INITs that would do this. They depend

Re: [leaf-devel] Ports to Non-x86 Platforms?

2003-03-21 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
David Douthitt wrote: Now with OpenBoot firmware, you don't need all that - you don't need MacOS at all. Open firmware rocks! And it's forth! I've been using forth for the AVR microcontroller code required in a humidity/temperature logger/alarm I'm designing under contract. The PC application

Re: [leaf-devel] Ports to Non-x86 Platforms?

2003-03-21 Thread David Douthitt
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 08:37 PM, Lynn Avants wrote: On Thursday 20 March 2003 08:15 pm, David Douthitt wrote: I, too have been interested in a PowerPC port - mainly because the most popular alternative to the Intel PC platform is Apple Macintosh. Unfortunately, until the introduction of

Re: [leaf-devel] Ports to Non-x86 Platforms?

2003-03-20 Thread Lynn Avants
On Thursday 20 March 2003 08:15 pm, David Douthitt wrote: > I, too have been interested in a PowerPC port - mainly because the most > popular alternative to the Intel PC platform is Apple Macintosh. > Unfortunately, until the introduction of "New ROMs" using OpenBoot, the > Macs wouldn't have all o

Re: [leaf-devel] Ports to Non-x86 Platforms?

2003-03-20 Thread David Douthitt
On Monday, March 10, 2003, at 07:45 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Brian Credeur wrote: Hi, Just curious: Are there any (existing or planned) ports of LEAF to non-x86 platforms? I've been interested in doing a PowerPC port of LEAF since I got my first LRP baesd firewall running. This may act

Re: [leaf-devel] Ports to Non-x86 Platforms?

2003-03-19 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Brian Credeur wrote: I have heard an unconfirmed rumor that the Linksys border routers are Linux/MIPS systems and this gives me two ideas: 1. Could LEAF be flashed onto a Linksys BER? 2. Could a LEAF/MIPS appliance be built for ~$100? I've looked at OpenBrick for an x86 appliance platform, but it

Re: [leaf-devel] Ports to Non-x86 Platforms?

2003-03-19 Thread Brian Credeur
I have heard an unconfirmed rumor that the Linksys border routers are Linux/MIPS systems and this gives me two ideas: 1. Could LEAF be flashed onto a Linksys BER? 2. Could a LEAF/MIPS appliance be built for ~$100? I've looked at OpenBrick for an x86 appliance platform, but it is still expensive

Re: [leaf-devel] Ports to Non-x86 Platforms?

2003-03-10 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Brian Credeur wrote: Hi, Just curious: Are there any (existing or planned) ports of LEAF to non-x86 platforms? I've been interested in doing a PowerPC port of LEAF since I got my first LRP baesd firewall running. This may actually happen in the near future, as a friend and I are discussing pl

[leaf-devel] Ports to Non-x86 Platforms?

2003-03-10 Thread Brian Credeur
Hi, Just curious: Are there any (existing or planned) ports of LEAF to non-x86 platforms? Thanks, Brian --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-07 Thread David Douthitt
On 2/7/02 at 9:07 AM, Charles Steinkuehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might also want to check out the gentoo linux portage > system: http://www.gentoo.org I've heard of them a while back; the creator was inspired to create his own distribution partly because of the BSD ports tree. I just

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-07 Thread David Douthitt
On 2/7/02 at 9:35 AM, guitarlynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (I had written:) > > > After the make install is done, the LEAF system now has > > > /tmp/wget.lrp and an installed wget binary. Lynn wrote: > Then you have come up with how Debian now installs . a > set of one or more boot floppi

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-07 Thread David Douthitt
On 2/7/02 at 10:07 AM, Jack Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've always been attracted by this, even to the point of > installed an OpenBSD 2.9 system to futz with. I bought OpenBSD 2.6 - and just invested in OpenBSD 3.0 :) Nice thing to install on a Quadra 800 :) Just installed OpenBSD 3.

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-07 Thread Jack Coates
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > I absolutely agree, but I think you're missing the point regarding how I'd > like to use the Gentoo portage system (or something similar). > > I am mainly looking for a way to co-opt a configuration/compiling > environment to make it easy for dev

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-07 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> So the choices I'm looking at for my next Linux install (now that my > Mandrake 8 boxen are getting out of date) are: > > LFS: appealing idea, but doesn't fix upgrading issues. > Gentoo: leading the pack because they've brought ports to Linux. > Sorcerer: very nifty, but showing a lot of rough e

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-07 Thread Jack Coates
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, David Douthitt wrote: > I've been working on setting up ports a little bit. I've finally > gotten to installing OpenBSD (this time on intel instead of mac68k) > and it uses ports like the other BSDs. > > Ports are really nice - basically you can download the entire ports > tr

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-07 Thread guitarlynn
On Thursday 07 February 2002 09:55, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > My intent was to suggest we co-opt the portage system to enable an > easily installed, standard development environment. We would also be > able to benifit from the work of others maintaining the portage tree > (updating packages

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-07 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> I haven't played with Gentoo, but this sounds very similar to 'ALFS' > which is an automated LFS. It compiles on the client box, but we > could work around that via CGI/MySQL and everything is done via > chroot. Source is available too. > > The problem I'm seeing is that SF is going to _kill_ us

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-07 Thread guitarlynn
comments inline ;} In reply to DD & CS (& others...): > > After the make install is done, the LEAF system now has > > /tmp/wget.lrp and an installed wget binary. Then you have come up with how Debian now installs . a set of one or more boot floppies, then 'wget' everything else. The unsta

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-07 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> I've been working on setting up ports a little bit. I've finally > gotten to installing OpenBSD (this time on intel instead of mac68k) > and it uses ports like the other BSDs. > > Ports are really nice - basically you can download the entire ports > tree, or just one. Then, you change director

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-07 Thread Mike Noyes
At 2002-02-06 22:19 -0600, David Douthitt wrote: >Considering what this could mean for LEAF, consider this: a >NFS-enabled LEAF system, with / from a full system mounted somewhere. >Changing directories to /usr/src/ports/net/wget, do a make (pulls the >file in, patches, builds, compiles) - and a m

[Leaf-devel] Ports

2002-02-06 Thread David Douthitt
I've been working on setting up ports a little bit. I've finally gotten to installing OpenBSD (this time on intel instead of mac68k) and it uses ports like the other BSDs. Ports are really nice - basically you can download the entire ports tree, or just one. Then, you change directory into /usr