Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-05-14 Thread David Douthitt
Mike Noyes wrote: > BTW, your ISO accounts for more than half of all our file downloads. > > Oxygen_2.1.3_iso_Oxygen-LRP-CD.bin 8,119 > Total 15,069 Wow. And not to mention that the CDROM is due for a new release too :-) I've added: - Disk images culled from

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-05-14 Thread Mike Noyes
David Douthitt, 2001-05-14 11:19 -0500 >Ewald Wasscher wrote: > > > > David Douthitt wrote: > > > >I've been compiling busybox these days under Red Hat 6.2 using > > >egcs-2.90.29 (egcs release 1.0.3). Perhaps I should upgrade? > > > That's up to you of course, but if your current compiler works

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-05-14 Thread David Douthitt
Ewald Wasscher wrote: > > David Douthitt wrote: > >I've been compiling busybox these days under Red Hat 6.2 using > >egcs-2.90.29 (egcs release 1.0.3). Perhaps I should upgrade? > That's up to you of course, but if your current compiler works properly > (I thought your segfualt issues were sol

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-05-14 Thread Ewald Wasscher
David Douthitt wrote: >Ewald Wasscher wrote: > >>It appears that busybox more segfaults when compiled with the slink >>"egcc", which is egcs-2.91.60, _and_ only when the lines it is fed don't >>fit on the screen. Recompiling with gcc-2.7.2.3 solved this. >> Perhaps I should try again with gcc-2.9

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-05-14 Thread David Douthitt
Ewald Wasscher wrote: > It appears that busybox more segfaults when compiled with the slink > "egcc", which is egcs-2.91.60, _and_ only when the lines it is fed don't > fit on the screen. Recompiling with gcc-2.7.2.3 solved this. Interesting! I've been compiling busybox these days under Red Hat

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-05-13 Thread Ewald Wasscher
Ewald Wasscher wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> On 23 Apr 2001, at 19:47, Ewald Wasscher wrote: >> >>> KP Kirchdörfer wrote: >> >> > 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51 I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness links and other

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-05-01 Thread ssrat
On 30 Apr 2001, at 22:17, Ewald Wasscher wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Ironic that Matthew (the fellow who did Materhorn) was the > > bridgeutils maintainer, and has now left it stagnate until someone > > else picked it up. > AFAIK the 2.4 kernel needs other bridge utils than Matthew'

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-30 Thread Ewald Wasscher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 30 Apr 2001, at 2:08, Ewald Wasscher wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> On 22 Apr 2001, at 14:34, Ewald Wasscher wrote: >> 22-4TODO: update all binaries to the _latest_ versions available? Is this a good idea? That will probably use some add

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-30 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 30. April 2001 03:08 schrieben Sie: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On 23 Apr 2001, at 19:47, Ewald Wasscher wrote: > >> KP Kirchdörfer wrote: > Unfortunately I do experience segfaults now with busybox more. It seems > that when it gets an input line longer than approx. 78 (don't know t

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Sonntag, 29. April 2001 23:16 schrieben Sie: > On 25 Apr 2001, at 21:02, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: > > Is the only choice between Scylla (vi-mode) and Charybdis (wasting disk > > space)? > > e3ws, e3vi, e3ne, e3em, et al, are just links to e3; in Oxygen you > need to be careful as the actual binary

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 30 Apr 2001, at 2:08, Ewald Wasscher wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On 22 Apr 2001, at 14:34, Ewald Wasscher wrote: > >> 22-4TODO: update all binaries to the _latest_ versions available? Is > >> this a good idea? That will probably use some additional diskspace > > Yes, definit

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread Ewald Wasscher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 23 Apr 2001, at 19:47, Ewald Wasscher wrote: > >> KP Kirchdörfer wrote: > 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51 >>> >>> I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness >>> links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread Ewald Wasscher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 22 Apr 2001, at 14:34, Ewald Wasscher wrote: > >> replace gunzip with zcat > > > My understanding is that zcat is: > > #!/bin/sh > > gunzip -c $1 Of course, but it's also an alias for the gunzip applet in busybox. > > >> 22-4add e3 (the pre 1.5 from oxyg

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 24 Apr 2001, at 8:30, Ewald Wasscher wrote: > I wonder why some people replace some POSIXness links with their busybox > counterparts. On average the POSIXness version is smaller, so why > replace it when it works? I bet that they don't care to remove the > relevant code from POSIXness so t

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 22 Apr 2001, at 14:34, Ewald Wasscher wrote: > replace gunzip with zcat My understanding is that zcat is: #!/bin/sh gunzip -c $1 > 22-4add e3 (the pre 1.5 from oxygen) as the default editor e3 is going to 1.5 very soon. Remember to change options in e3.asm... > 22-4TODO: update

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 23 Apr 2001, at 19:47, Ewald Wasscher wrote: > KP Kirchdörfer wrote: > >> 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51 > > I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness > > links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as long as we see the > > seg fault in

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 25 Apr 2001, at 21:02, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: > Is the only choice between Scylla (vi-mode) and Charybdis (wasting disk > space)? e3ws, e3vi, e3ne, e3em, et al, are just links to e3; in Oxygen you need to be careful as the actual binary is e3.bin, with a shell wrapper and all the links point t

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-25 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 23. April 2001 20:41 schrieben Sie: > KP Kirchdörfer wrote: > > >> 22-4add e3 (the pre 1.5 from oxygen) as the default editor > > > > Is this a version of e3, which don't make a backup of the original file? > > This feature of e3 is just wasting space, especially within lrcfg. > >

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-25 Thread George Metz
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Eric Wolzak wrote: > The problem was that the exclude option > overrides > the include option. > I used the following command > tar -c -v `cat $INCLUDE` -X $EXCLUDE | gzip > >$DIR/$PACKAGE.lrp So, uh, call me stupid and feel free to point and laugh and stuff, but can't y

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-24 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 24. April 2001 20:06 schrieben Sie: > KP Kirchdörfer wrote: > >>> I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the > >>> POSIXness links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as > >>> long as we see the seg fault in 'busybox more' it's not ready for prime

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-24 Thread Ewald Wasscher
Ewald Wasscher wrote: > I compile on a debian slink install with all of the updates. The > compiler I used was "egcc" which is gcc-2.91.60 iirc. Duh, that means glibc-2.0.7 of course Ewald Wasscher ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] htt

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-24 Thread Ewald Wasscher
KP Kirchdörfer wrote: >>> I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the >>> POSIXness links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as long >>> as we see the seg fault in 'busybox more' it's not ready for prime time - >>> even if it's a beta version. >> >> How shoul

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-24 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 24. April 2001 18:54 schrieben Sie: > On the other hand I've included minix-support IN busybox - allows me to Sorry, cut-and-paste error: On the other hand I've included minix-support FROM busybox - allows me to kp ___ Leaf-devel mailin

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-24 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 23. April 2001 20:41 schrieben Sie: > KP Kirchdörfer wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 22. April 2001 15:31 schrieb Ewald Wasscher: > >> 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51 > > > > I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the > > POSIXness links and other progs with busyb

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-24 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 24. April 2001 09:25 schrieb Ewald Wasscher: > > > I use it.also without problem > > this is my busybox list: > > basename, busybox, cat, chgrp, chmod, chown, > > clear, cp, cut, date,dd, df, dirname, dmesg, du, > > dutmp, echo, egrep, expr, false,fdflush,find, > > free, grep, gunzip,

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-24 Thread Ewald Wasscher
Eric Wolzak wrote: >> Too bad. Probably I won't have much luck, but > > I'll try anyway :-) > be carefull with root.lrp. I used tar and > everything did backup fine. > Only root caused a real trouble. > I experimented with this for some time a summary > of my post: > > The problem was that

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-23 Thread Eric Wolzak
Ewald wrote > KP Kirchd=F6rfer wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, 22. April 2001 15:31 schrieb Ewald Wasscher: > > > >> 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51 > > > > > > I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POS= IXness > > links and other progs with busybox and tiny

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-23 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> > Might I add to the TODO-list, to include Seawall? > > What does Charles think about that? For most home-users the default > Eigerstein firewall rules will be sufficient I suppose. For an updated EigerStein image, the current firewall scripts should remain, or migrate to something like my exte

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-23 Thread Ewald Wasscher
KP Kirchdörfer wrote: > Am Sonntag, 22. April 2001 15:31 schrieb Ewald Wasscher: > >> 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51 > > > I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness > links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as long as we see the > se

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-22 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2001 15:31 schrieb Ewald Wasscher: > 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51 I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as long as we see the seg fault in 'busybox more' it's not read

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-22 Thread Ewald Wasscher
Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > Wow! Progress!!! > >> Below you'll find a list of all the changes I have made so far in the >> process of producing an updated version of Eigerstein2BETA. Feedback is >> of course appreciated. I also wonder if it's possible to compile >> tinylogin with md5 password

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-22 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Wow! Progress!!! > Below you'll find a list of all the changes I have made so far in the > process of producing an updated version of Eigerstein2BETA. Feedback is > of course appreciated. I also wonder if it's possible to compile > tinylogin with md5 passwords (good idea anyway) and without link

[Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-22 Thread Ewald Wasscher
Hello all, Below you'll find a list of all the changes I have made so far in the process of producing an updated version of Eigerstein2BETA. Feedback is of course appreciated. I also wonder if it's possible to compile tinylogin with md5 passwords (good idea anyway) and without linking with li