Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-03 Thread davidMbrooke
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 15:36 +0200, Andrew wrote: > 01.11.2011 21:34, davidMbrooke пишет: > > On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 21:21 +0200, Andrew wrote: > >> 01.11.2011 20:11, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > >>> Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 00:06:50 schrieb Andrew: > > > > The Yocto Project has the backing of The

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-03 Thread Andrew
03.11.2011 14:58, Erich Titl пишет: > Hi Andrew > > at 03.11.2011 12:27, Andrew wrote: >> 03.11.2011 11:28, Andrew пишет: >>> P.S. linux kernel can load archived modules; this can slightly reduce >>> memory consumption by ramfs. >>From now 'next' branch uses compressed modules - now default me

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-03 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew at 03.11.2011 12:27, Andrew wrote: > 03.11.2011 11:28, Andrew пишет: >> P.S. linux kernel can load archived modules; this can slightly reduce >> memory consumption by ramfs. > From now 'next' branch uses compressed modules - now default memory > footprint is ~20M; also it'll require

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-03 Thread Andrew
03.11.2011 11:28, Andrew пишет: > P.S. linux kernel can load archived modules; this can slightly reduce > memory consumption by ramfs. From now 'next' branch uses compressed modules - now default memory footprint is ~20M; also it'll require much less RAM for module auto-loading (compressed mod

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-03 Thread Andrew
03.11.2011 09:12, Erich Titl пишет: > Andrew > > at 02.11.2011 23:19, Andrew wrote: >> Hi all again. >> Today I finished porting of all basic set of packages that are included >> by default into leaf.cfg, + some more. I did this mostly for comparision >> of RAM usage; -O2 + some busybox features +

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-03 Thread Erich Titl
Andrew at 02.11.2011 23:19, Andrew wrote: > Hi all again. > Today I finished porting of all basic set of packages that are included > by default into leaf.cfg, + some more. I did this mostly for comparision > of RAM usage; -O2 + some busybox features + some updated software > versions gives ~23

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-02 Thread Andrew
Hi all again. Today I finished porting of all basic set of packages that are included by default into leaf.cfg, + some more. I did this mostly for comparision of RAM usage; -O2 + some busybox features + some updated software versions gives ~23M memory usage for i686 iso; 4.1.1 version eats ~20M

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-02 Thread Andrew
01.11.2011 21:34, davidMbrooke пишет: > On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 21:21 +0200, Andrew wrote: >> 01.11.2011 20:11, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>> Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 00:06:50 schrieb Andrew: >>> >>> Not a proposal, just a quick idea: it might be easier longterm to fork >>> again from buildroot an

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch - libresolv

2011-11-01 Thread Andrew
01.11.2011 21:44, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Hi Andrew; > > Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 20:21:24 schrieb Andrew: >> Changes in ppp isn't too heavy - just update plugin's rp_pppoe version >> to 3.10 (which is now in building tree) and to remove missing library >> (libresolv) - that is for unknown r

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch - libresolv

2011-11-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 20:21:24 schrieb Andrew: > Changes in ppp isn't too heavy - just update plugin's rp_pppoe version > to 3.10 (which is now in building tree) and to remove missing library > (libresolv) - that is for unknown reason isn't present as separate > library and pos

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-01 Thread davidMbrooke
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 21:21 +0200, Andrew wrote: > 01.11.2011 20:11, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 00:06:50 schrieb Andrew: > > > > Not a proposal, just a quick idea: it might be easier longterm to fork > > again from buildroot and adjust it to our needs, instead of hack

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-01 Thread Andrew
01.11.2011 20:11, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 00:06:50 schrieb Andrew: >> Hi all again. >> Now I finished porting of basic package set to new toolchain - all that >> are needed for building kernel, root.lrp, initrd and moddb, to look how >> it's working into VM. >> Minim

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 00:06:50 schrieb Andrew: > Hi all again. > Now I finished porting of basic package set to new toolchain - all that > are needed for building kernel, root.lrp, initrd and moddb, to look how > it's working into VM. > Minimal system booted OK; also I saw that syslog-ng i

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-01 Thread Andrew
01.11.2011 01:39, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 12:40:12 schrieb Andrew: >> 31.10.2011 13:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>> Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 11:19:38 schrieb Andrew: 31.10.2011 12:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb A

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 12:40:12 schrieb Andrew: > 31.10.2011 13:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 11:19:38 schrieb Andrew: > >> 31.10.2011 12:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > >>> Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew: > Hi all. > Today I have en

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-31 Thread Andrew
Hi all again. Now I finished porting of basic package set to new toolchain - all that are needed for building kernel, root.lrp, initrd and moddb, to look how it's working into VM. Minimal system booted OK; also I saw that syslog-ng in new environment is linked with libpthread - so I included in

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-31 Thread Andrew
31.10.2011 13:16, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 12:05:01 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: >> Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 11:19:38 schrieb Andrew: >>> 31.10.2011 12:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew: > Hi all. > Today I hav

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-31 Thread Andrew
31.10.2011 13:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 11:19:38 schrieb Andrew: >> 31.10.2011 12:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>> Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain. Now I finished

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 12:05:01 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: > Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 11:19:38 schrieb Andrew: > > 31.10.2011 12:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > > Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew: > > >> Hi all. > > >> Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF t

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 11:19:38 schrieb Andrew: > 31.10.2011 12:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew: > >> Hi all. > >> Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain. > >> Now I finished very basic rework on it, it looks like now

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-31 Thread Andrew
31.10.2011 12:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew: >> Hi all. >> Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain. >> Now I finished very basic rework on it, it looks like now it should >> successfully compile C applications and has workin

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew: > Hi all. > Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain. > Now I finished very basic rework on it, it looks like now it should > successfully compile C applications and has working C++ compiler w/o c++ > libraries (I planned t

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2011, 09:32:20 schrieb Andrew: > 30.10.2011 00:12, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew: > >> Hi all. > >> Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain. > >> Now I finished very basic rework on it, it looks like no

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-30 Thread Andrew
30.10.2011 00:12, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew: >> Hi all. >> Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain. >> Now I finished very basic rework on it, it looks like now it should >> successfully compile C applications and has workin

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-29 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew: > Hi all. > Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain. > Now I finished very basic rework on it, it looks like now it should > successfully compile C applications and has working C++ compiler w/o c++ > libraries (I planned t

[leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-10-29 Thread Andrew
Hi all. Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain. Now I finished very basic rework on it, it looks like now it should successfully compile C applications and has working C++ compiler w/o c++ libraries (I planned to replace libstdc++ to uClibcpp). Now compiler has native arch