On 12/20/01 at 8:34 AM, Angelacos, Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The default screen is the "linux" config screen. F1 will
> make the cdrom/largenet/firewall/etc." options appear, and
> F10 will make the "Linux" option the current screen again.
That's right.
> When using CDROM, it still t
>You're seeing this error because the default configuration is linux -
>which is for a floppy-based boot. The most recent CDROM should use
>cdrom as the default config.
Ah. Thanks.
The default screen is the "linux" config screen. F1 will make the
cdrom/largenet/firewall/etc." options appear,
>Good point. It may be possible as cdrtools (mkisofs) compiles fine under
>cygwin. I haven't tried though. But I agree it will be harder for many
>end-users.
Ewald,
mkisofs / cdrecord work fine in a pure Windows config. I use them to produce
almost all CD's here at work.
I can make them boo
On 12/18/01 at 4:32 PM, Angelacos, Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In case it is any help to anyone else, when I booted with the CD
> and just hit enter (default is linux), linuxrc ran until the section
>
> *** ALMOST ALL OTHER PARAMETERS WILL BE IGNORED! ***
>
> LINUXRC: couldn't moun
Am Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2001 19:36 schrieb Ewald Wasscher:
> Luis.F.Correia wrote:
> >Nathan,
> >
> >When booting from a CD, the only floppy formats supported are 1.44 and
> > 2.88.
>
> David, others, is there a reason for using syslinux instead of isolinux?
> I'd say it's easier to use isolinux
> >>David, others, is there a reason for using syslinux instead of isolinux?
> >>I'd say it's easier to use isolinux and forget about floppy images on
> >>the CD.
> >2) It's easier (IMHO) for end-users to modify the floppy disk boot image
if
> >they need to burn a CD than it is to modify the isol
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>>David, others, is there a reason for using syslinux instead of isolinux?
>>I'd say it's easier to use isolinux and forget about floppy images on
>>the CD.
>>
>
>I don't know about David, but I've stuck with using a floppy disk image for
>a couple of reasons:
>
>1) It
> David, others, is there a reason for using syslinux instead of isolinux?
> I'd say it's easier to use isolinux and forget about floppy images on
> the CD.
I don't know about David, but I've stuck with using a floppy disk image for
a couple of reasons:
1) It's generally easier for me to maintai
>David, others, is there a reason for using syslinux instead of isolinux?
>I'd say it's easier to use isolinux and forget about floppy images on
>the CD.
FWIW,
ISOLinux worked great on the initial load, but there were some problems with
LINUXRC.
If I recall correctly, it seemed to want to mou
Luis.F.Correia wrote:
>Nathan,
>
>When booting from a CD, the only floppy formats supported are 1.44 and 2.88.
>
David, others, is there a reason for using syslinux instead of isolinux?
I'd say it's easier to use isolinux and forget about floppy images on
the CD.
Ewald Wasscher
___
Luis.F.Correia wrote:
>When booting from a CD, the only floppy formats supported are 1.44
and 2.88.
>Check which format Oxygen-CD is using and correct your config file.
Luis,
Thanks.
Just as a clarification, the CD-image I'm using is (currently dated Dec 17)
and at:
http:le
Subject: RE: [Leaf-devel] Oxygen Updates
David Douthitt wrote:
>Also, the Oxygen Bootable CDROM has been updated, but the 'largenet'
>configuration is still SegFaulting at the end. Please help me find >out
why It's very puzzling, as there is plenty of R
David Douthitt wrote:
>Also, the Oxygen Bootable CDROM has been updated, but the 'largenet'
>configuration is still SegFaulting at the end. Please help me find
>out why It's very puzzling, as there is plenty of RAMdisk space
>and other configurations work fine.
In case it is any help to
13 matches
Mail list logo
