RE: [leaf-user] Re: 3c509.o problem, compiling src for WISP-dist

Hi, I succesfully compiled all NetDrivers-3.1 sources wisp WISP-Dist kernel, but I was able to test only 3c509.o Its now working fine no crashes. I used simple gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -O6 -I/usr/src/wisp-dist -c module.c [-include /usr/src/wisp-dist/include/linux/modversions.h] By this I compi

[leaf-user] Multiple IP addr in Bering.

Hi, I've read something before about this, is was something like up ip add addr dev eth0 down ip add addr dev eth0 but i'm not sure. Anyone can enlight me ? I want to have several IP's on the same interface, for routing purposes... Like, now the external inteface is 194.176.188.5 and i

[leaf-user] WISP-Dist Firewall

Do WISP-dist contain Shorewall firewall in some it's package or you have to use package from bering distrib? Or you have to use just iptables script to set firewall and NAT? I am running 3 interfaces WISP now and IMHO seems that routing is off by default... Is it possible? Thanks Litin -

RE: [leaf-user] WISP-Dist Firewall

Can I use Bearing packages for WISP distrib? If so, I can try to modify packages by dividing them into cramfs and lrp parts. Litin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dominik Strnad Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECT

[leaf-user] Re: WISP-Dist Firewall

Dominik Strnad wrote: > Do WISP-dist contain Shorewall firewall in some it's package or you have to > use package from bering distrib? > Or you have to use just iptables script to set firewall and NAT? WISP-Dist comes with iptables. You can install anything else you want, including shorewall.

Re: [leaf-user] WISP-Dist Firewall

Dominik Strnad wrote: > Can I use Bearing packages for WISP distrib? If so, I can try to modify > packages by dividing them into cramfs and lrp parts. You can even use .lrp packages if you want. Just make sure that you have enough free space on temporary partition (hdX2, or RAM, if you use tmpf

[leaf-user] HELP use Bering with GATED for RIP2, no Shorewall installed

Greets, i use Bering with GATED for RIP2, i have no Shorewall installed! Eth0: 1xx.200.0.0, 255.255.0.0 Eth1: 10.200.27.0, 255.255.255.0 I have the following problem: My Bering Box get all the RIP2 Informations from the other RIP2 Routers, so i have a huge routing tabelle! But i think, my box

Re: [leaf-user] ssh

- Original Message - From: "David Douthitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ArisB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jeff Newmiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 4:06 AM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] ssh > Shutdown the sshd daemon on the firewall, and start it fr

[leaf-user] telnetd.lrp or rshd.lrp ?

Hello, I'm looking for lrp packages that contain rshd and/or telnetd. The configuration is described somewhere, but I can find no binaries for my bering box. Yes - I know - the world is insecure and telnet and rsh, too. But I will see a "sniffer" if he manages to crawl under my table between

Re: [leaf-user] ssh

Aris At 14:25 10.10.2002, you wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "David Douthitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "ArisB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: "Jeff Newmiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 4:06 AM >Subject: Re: [leaf-user] ssh > > > >When i st

RE: [leaf-user] RE:DMZ configuration problems

Your advice is well taken. I solved it last night. It was the eth2 NIC in the router. I replaced the NIC and everything worked. Thanks for the help. This list is great! Troy -Original Message- From: Ray Olszewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09

[leaf-user] Shorewall question

I have a quick shorewall question. How can I forward https connections to webmin on port 25000 and Apache SSL on port 443? I am running a server behind shorewall. I need to enable access to SSL on two different ports. I have setup rules to forward c

Re: [leaf-user] telnetd.lrp or rshd.lrp ?

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 02:28:33PM +0200, Elmar Gerwalin wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking for lrp packages that contain rshd and/or telnetd. > The configuration is described somewhere, but I can find no binaries for my > bering box. CMIIW but I do believe you can use the package from the Oxygen

[leaf-user] Re: LRP Help

I'm not sure exactly what you're using, and what you're trying to do. If you're using one of my distributions, please send questions like this to the Leaf-user list as indicated on my support page: http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/Support.htm You should be able to easily setup port-forwarding to handl

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall question

Troy Aden wrote: > I have a quick shorewall question. > How can I forward https connections to webmin on port 25000 > and Apache SSL on port 443? > I am running a server behind shorewall. I need to enable > access to SSL on two different ports. I have s

[leaf-user] RE: [leaf-devel] snort and nmap

Thanks David, I will keep my eyes open for them. Regards, Eric Kiser -Original Message- From: David Douthitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:52 PM To: Eric B Kiser Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] snort and nmap On Wed,

Re: [leaf-user] Multiple IP addr in Bering.

Just put your commands of ip aliasing like this on /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh : ip a add 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 ip a add 192.168.2.0/24 dev eth0 thank's --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > I've read something before about this, is > was something like > > up ip add addr dev eth0 > dow

Re: [leaf-user] Multiple IP addr in Bering.

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Muhammad Wicaksono Mursid wrote: > Just put your commands of ip aliasing like this on > /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh : > > ip a add 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 > ip a add 192.168.2.0/24 dev eth0 Putting network configuration commands in /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh is a good way to driv

Re: [leaf-user] Multiple IP addr in Bering.

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:12:17 +0300 brosky wrote: > Hi, > > I've read something before about this, is > was something like > > up ip add addr dev eth0 > down ip add addr dev eth0 > > but i'm not sure. > > Anyone can enlight me ? > > I want to have several IP's on the same interface, for r

Re: [leaf-user] RE:DMZ configuration problems

Ray Olszewski wrote: > > I waited to reply in the hope that someone would offer better advice > than I can. Well that's not gonna happen anytime soon :) You pretty well helped him through any leaf config probs he had. It works now. just slowly :/ Troy, Slow ftp means driver/nic/cableing/c

[leaf-user] Anyone in Northern California / SF Bay area?

Might be interested in paying someone local for some consulting/hand-holding for our LEAF project. We are going to be hooking up 100mbits over TP to start, but will quickly moving to 300mbits over gigabit ethernet with fiber. We might need someone to help setting up the LEAF box to do all the

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Michael D. Schleif wrote: > "Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > >>does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? > > > Anybody have such setup that works? > I have three nics in Bering rc3 eth1 10.10.10.0/24 + tinydns private + dnscach

Re: [leaf-user] Multiple IP addr in Bering.

Jeff Newmiller wrote: M.W.M.: >>Just put your commands of ip aliasing like this on >>/etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh : J.N.: > Putting network configuration commands in /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh is a > good way to 1) make a long thread on leaf user :) 2) make the aliases at a late stage in the boo

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

thank you, for your continued interest . . . Matthew Schalit wrote: > > Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > "Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > > > >>does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? > > > > Anybody have such setup that works? > > I have three nics in Bering rc3 > >

Re: [leaf-user] Multiple IP addr in Bering.

Matthew Schalit wrote: > Jeff Newmiller wrote: > > > M.W.M.: > >>> Just put your commands of ip aliasing like this on >>> /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh : >> > > J.N.: > >> Putting network configuration commands in /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh is a >> good way to > > > > 1) make a long thread on l

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Michael D. Schleif wrote: > thank you, for your continued interest . . . > > Matthew Schalit wrote: > >>Michael D. Schleif wrote: >> >>>"Michael D. Schleif" wrote: >>> >>> does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? >>> >>>Anybody have such setup that works? >> >>I

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Matthew Schalit wrote: > > Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > thank you, for your continued interest . . . > > > > Matthew Schalit wrote: > > > >>Michael D. Schleif wrote: > >> > >>>"Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > >>> > >>> > does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? >

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

"Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > > Matthew Schalit wrote: > > Do you forward and masq from the dmz to internal or just forward? > > Have you posted all the rules you're using for that? > > this could be it: > > this page will update

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Matthew Schalit wrote: > Please tell me you've added ipchains -l logging to every packet > 1) inbound on dmz nic > 2) outbound from dmz nic > 3) inbound on internal nic > 4) outbound on internal nic > 5) forwarded by any forward rule > > and r

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

"Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > > Matthew Schalit wrote: > > > > > Please tell me you've added ipchains -l logging to every packet > > 1) inbound on dmz nic > > 2) outbound from dmz nic > > 3) inbound on internal nic > > 4) outbound on internal nic > >

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

On or before Wed, 09 Oct 2002 11:06:30 EST mds and Charles S wrote: mds> I cannot get dmz hosts to resolve addresses for remote internet mds> sites solely via tinydns-public and dnscache ;< tinydns tries to mds> resolve the name and gives up, without so much as asking dnscache. [other details

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Brad Fritz wrote: > > On or before Wed, 09 Oct 2002 11:06:30 EST mds and Charles S wrote: > > mds> I cannot get dmz hosts to resolve addresses for remote internet > mds> sites solely via tinydns-public and dnscache ;< tinydns tries to > mds> resolve the name and gives up, without so much as as