On Thursday 02 January 2003 10:59 pm, you wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:00:17 CST Lynn Avants wrote:
> Not that you said they were, but the unspecified DNS suffix and
> the nslookup "Can't find server name..." message are not related.
> nslookup is complaining because the PTR lookup for
> 254.1.
On Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:00:17 CST Lynn Avants wrote:
> On Thursday 02 January 2003 09:30 pm, you wrote:
>
> > I have never seen the lag in Win2K on any other network but mine.
> > See below for data.
>
> I can tell you why.. ;-)
>
>
> > Primary DNS Suffix . . . . . . . :
> >
Kory,
On Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:30:32 EST Kory Krofft wrote:
> Brad,
> Here is what I can provide. I do not doubt you that Leaf may not
> be the culprit. I have removed the secondary DNS IP from the TCP
> config and run several of the tests you suggested. I noticed however
> that once I removed t
On Thursday 02 January 2003 09:30 pm, you wrote:
> I have never seen the lag in Win2K on any other network but mine.
> See below for data.
I can tell you why.. ;-)
> Primary DNS Suffix . . . . . . . :
> Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast
> C:\>nslookup
> *** Ca
On Thu, 02 Jan 2003 12:01:51 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Message: 5
> From: "S Mohan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'leaf-user'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:22:54 +0530
> Subject: [leaf-user] IPSec
>
> Chad has made Win2K configuration using IPSec look simple in his
> docume
Brad,
Here is what I can provide. I do not doubt you that Leaf may not be the
culprit.
I have removed the secondary DNS IP from the TCP config and run several
of the
tests you suggested. I noticed however that once I removed the IP I no
longer am
experiencing the lag. It has only been a few hou
--On Thursday, January 02, 2003 02:57:39 PM -0700 Steve Fink
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I modified the configuration more to match the examples on your
website. I must have missed the policy example on the previous
documentation, because I didn't have anything in there.
Here is the output o
--On Thursday, January 02, 2003 02:57:39 PM -0700 Steve Fink
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom,
I modified the configuration more to match the examples on your
website. I must have missed the policy example on the previous
documentation, because I didn't have anything in there.
Here is the ou
Tom,
I modified the configuration more to match the examples on your
website. I must have missed the policy example on the previous
documentation, because I didn't have anything in there.
Here is the output of shorewall status. I still can't get a Win2K
connection to even show an
Hi Kory
Kory Krofft wrote the following at 18:09 01.01.2003:
Folks,
Thanks for all the input I received on this. While I orginally
believed that it was more of a Win2K issue than a LEAF one but
now I am not so sure. What I learned from the group was that Win2K
uses what might be termed a "Non St
This appears to be the default in Bering/Shorewall for PPPoE and is already
set.
Thanks.
===
Work: http://www.olgclotteries.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
888-345-7568 ext. 2205
Personal: http://www.mullan.ca
[EMAIL PROTECTE
11 matches
Mail list logo