[leaf-user] "Could not mount the boot device" error message

2003-01-09 Thread Craig Caughlin
Hi folks, I'm making a new Bering bootable CD, and I think I have followed the step by step instructions in the Bering user's guide exactly, and I get this error message: end_request: I/O error, dev 02:00 (floppy), sector 0 end_request: I/O error, dev 02:00 (floppy), sector 0 LINUXRC: Could not mo

[leaf-user] syslinux problem

2003-01-09 Thread Chris Buxton
I'm trying to install the wisp distro. I've never used syslinux before. When I follow the instructions in the wisp docs for installation, when I then reboot, it says, "boot failed". Any hints? I've tried it exactly as described, and also using grub. Can I replace syslinux with grub entirely (I

Re: [leaf-user] Bad Bering natsemi.o driver?

2003-01-09 Thread Gene Smith
Craig Caughlin wrote: Hi folks, I'm preparing a new box with the latest, stable Bering and I'm wondering if the driver might be bad? I downloaded the natsemi.o driver for the Netgear FA311 NICs I have from http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.20/net /, and when I use i

[leaf-user] Bad Bering natsemi.o driver?

2003-01-09 Thread Craig Caughlin
Hi folks, I'm preparing a new box with the latest, stable Bering and I'm wondering if the driver might be bad? I downloaded the natsemi.o driver for the Netgear FA311 NICs I have from http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.20/net /, and when I use it, only eth0 is detecte

Re: [leaf-user] Tulip drivers on Bering 1.0 Stable

2003-01-09 Thread tmassey
Hello! As an aside, don't forget that newer FA311's are not Tulip (DEC 21140) based at all, but rather use a NetGear-specific chip. I use these extensively in my firewalls, and they use the fa311.o driver instead. Tim Massey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/09/2003 06:40:24 PM: > > You need t

Re: [leaf-user] LEAF 2.0.3 'default setup' problems (ping failing)

2003-01-09 Thread Mike Noyes
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 16:58, Brad Fritz wrote: > Failed pings are also > documented well in the shorewall docs. Search for "ping" in the > FAQs and Troubleshooting documents at http://shorewall.net/ for > details. Brad, The Shorewall ping information is here: ICMP Echo-request (Ping) htt

Re: [leaf-user] LEAF 2.0.3 'default setup' problems (ping failing)

2003-01-09 Thread Brad Fritz
Wynne, Ray did a good job with the general, low-level debugging suggestions. Unless you've made drastic setup changes, I expect IP forwarding to already be enabled. If that's the case, the next place to check is firewall rules and policies. The best advice I can give is to keep a close eye on

Re: [leaf-user] LEAF 2.0.3 'default setup' problems (ping failing)

2003-01-09 Thread Mike Noyes
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 16:05, Ray Olszewski wrote: > If that's not it, then the problem is most likely in the firewall ruleset. > I'm also not a Shorewall expert, but either one of the Shorewall experts > can tell you its command for reporting firewall details, or you can report > the underlying

Re: [leaf-user] LEAF 2.0.3 'default setup' problems (ping failing)

2003-01-09 Thread Ray Olszewski
On the router, what is the output of this command? cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward It should be 1. If it is 0, then you do not have IP forwarding turned on on the rotuer, and it will not route anything. Fixing that would probably (I'm no expert on Bering config files, I fear) involve

Re: [leaf-user] Tulip drivers on Bering 1.0 Stable

2003-01-09 Thread wing newton
You need to insmod pci-scan.o and then tulip.o. It runs fine in my system with 2 DEC cards. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I have been using EigerStein 2-Beta for about three > years and have been very > satisfied with it. I recently changed ISP's and > need to use PPPoE and > decided t

[leaf-user] LEAF 2.0.3 'default setup' problems (ping failing)

2003-01-09 Thread Wynne Crompton
Hi, I'm a newbie, but would be grateful for help with the following: I set up the following isolated network in order to help learn/test my set-up of Bering 2.0.3: HOST'far' IP 1.2.3.1 running RH Linux 6.2 | | | 1.2.3.4/24 Bering firewall

Re: Fw: [leaf-user] Dachstein CD with Realtek 8139 NICs

2003-01-09 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 11:36 AM 1/9/03 -0800, Chris Low wrote: Great! Thanks for the confirmation. I'm running into another issue though, when I run the unmount /mnt command after making changes to config files on the floppy I get the following msg: Unmount: not found Did I burn a bad copy of the CD or is there s

RE: Fw: [leaf-user] Umount, not UNmount, Duhhh!

2003-01-09 Thread Troy Aden
Don't be too hard on yourself. Everyone is a newbie at least once. ;-)) (I have asked worse questions to this list and been very impressed how nice everyone was to me.) -Original Message- From: Chris Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003

Re: Fw: [leaf-user] Umount, not UNmount, Duhhh!

2003-01-09 Thread Chris Low
Okay, I'm an idiot =) Thanks for all the answers received and all your patience with an obvious newbie! Chris --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.c

Re: Fw: [leaf-user] Dachstein CD with Realtek 8139 NICs

2003-01-09 Thread Etienne Charlier
try umount not unmount - Original Message - From: "Chris Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 8:36 PM Subject: Re: Fw: [leaf-user] Dachstein CD with Realtek 8139 NICs > Great! Thanks for the confirmation. I'm running into another issue though,

Re: Fw: [leaf-user] Dachstein CD with Realtek 8139 NICs

2003-01-09 Thread Chris Low
Great! Thanks for the confirmation. I'm running into another issue though, when I run the unmount /mnt command after making changes to config files on the floppy I get the following msg: Unmount: not found Did I burn a bad copy of the CD or is there something I'm doing wrong? Chris At 06:48 A

RE: [leaf-user] Bering package.local file for partial backups

2003-01-09 Thread Todd Pearsall
Contributions section...what an odd place for it ;) Thanks. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Noyes > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:52 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Bering package.local file for par

RE: [leaf-user] Bering package.local file for partial backups

2003-01-09 Thread Mike Noyes
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 06:40, Todd Pearsall wrote: > If update some of the Bering packages with the .local files (mostly > stealing from Dachstein) is there a home for them on > leaf.sourceforge.net? I'd hate to go through the hassle and no one else > benefits. Todd, Of course there is space for n

Re: [leaf-user] Does this indicate I've been hacked?

2003-01-09 Thread Lynn Avants
On Thursday 09 January 2003 12:30 am, Tony wrote: > Hi Lynn, > > When you say you, you mean the original poster...right? I was responding > to him. Yep, however Sandro uses Portsentry and indicates that this is normal operation of PortSentryso it is not a hack, but rather someone likely tryi

Re: Fw: [leaf-user] Dachstein CD with Realtek 8139 NICs

2003-01-09 Thread M Lu
Yes, here is what I have in my /etc/modules ... ! mount iso9660 /dev/hda # Change the default directory, like this: ! dir /lib/modules/net ###Some ethernet cards #3c509 irq=5 pci-scan rtl8139 .. - Original Message - From: "Chris Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [leaf-user] Bering package.local file for partial backups

2003-01-09 Thread Todd Pearsall
If update some of the Bering packages with the .local files (mostly stealing from Dachstein) is there a home for them on leaf.sourceforge.net? I'd hate to go through the hassle and no one else benefits. Thanks. - Todd > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

Re: [leaf-user] Tulip drivers on Bering 1.0 Stable

2003-01-09 Thread Brad Fritz
On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 08:18:12 EST Wayne Fool wrote: > Hi, > > I have been using EigerStein 2-Beta for about three years and have been very > satisfied with it. I recently changed ISP's and need to use PPPoE and > decided to upgrade to Bering 1.0 Stable. I am using a 100 MHZ Pentium with > 40 me

[leaf-user] Tulip drivers on Bering 1.0 Stable

2003-01-09 Thread wfool
Hi, I have been using EigerStein 2-Beta for about three years and have been very satisfied with it. I recently changed ISP's and need to use PPPoE and decided to upgrade to Bering 1.0 Stable. I am using a 100 MHZ Pentium with 40 meg of Ram. I use two Netgear FA311 network cards. I used the tul

[leaf-user] Re: Do not see DoC device with WISP build 2469

2003-01-09 Thread Vladimir I.
I added entries for node creation in a wrong place. Should be ok now. I have put a new test image in http://www.hazard.maks.net/wisp-dist/downloads , please let me know if it helps. David Ondzes wrote: The bootup correctly identifies my 72 meg DoC but I can't seem to mount it. ls -l /dev/n* /

Re: [leaf-user] wisp with serial_cs and yenta_socket?

2003-01-09 Thread Vladimir I.
No, serial_cs is serial_cs. :) Grab the modules package from http://www.hazard.maks.net/wisp-dist/downloads and take whatever modules you need. Nicolas Cedraschi wrote: Thanks Does the i82365 module also replaces the serial_cs.o (which we need for a modem) or is there another according module

Re: [leaf-user] Mail Questions

2003-01-09 Thread Greg Morgan
Gary St wrote: Hello Everyone. I'm using Eigerstien 2.2.16 and when i try to send mail with command: mail -s test [EMAIL PROTECTED] < somefile I get back: Error: Unknown response. RSET 0: Aborting due to connection error Killing child processes: 2736 2739 with nothing in the logs. Any ide

Re: [leaf-user] wisp with serial_cs and yenta_socket?

2003-01-09 Thread Nicolas Cedraschi
Thanks Does the i82365 module also replaces the serial_cs.o (which we need for a modem) or is there another according module in this configuration? Vladimir I. wrote: Try the latest test WISP-Dist release from http://www.hazard.maks.net/wisp-dist/downloads. Also, WISP-Dist does not use in-ker