I am trying to have the mail procedure in the POSIXness script send me an
email via the cron .
If I run mail from the command shell or directly from a script it works
fine. but when it is run in a script that is run by cron it does not.
I can see the mail processes using 'ps' but no mail is
Karlnet image is forced to use a different kernel in order to run
Karlnet driver and therefore is lagging behind mainstream WISP-Dist
releases. I don't have time to maintain the KarlNet tree, however I do
plan to make a new release fixing a few bugs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm user from
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Bob Pocius wrote:
I'm struggling with getting 1.1 to boot from a cd. This is the same problem
I had the first time I tried the 2.4.20 version of 1.0 stable. During
bootup, the system returns the Could not load packages error. I found the
error in linuxrc, and it seems
Hello;
The problem/situation is:
I have two LEAF routers with dynamic ip's, changing at least once a day.
Both are setup with latest Bering-uClibc 1.1.
I build a solution, but I'm not shure if that's the way to go.
Please review, esp regarding security (vpn/shorewall issues).
The network
For a little over a week now I have been trying to get a vpn pass
through connection working using a Dachstein LRP box.
This morning I got it working.
The real problem was a faulty software installation of the Cisco client
on the windows machine.
The LRP box was never the issue but got most of
Hello list,
I am a very happy Bering 1.0 user. Are there any compelling reasons to upgrade
to Bering 1.1?
regards
Chera Bekker
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
On Monday 24 February 2003 09:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real problem was a faulty software installation of the Cisco client
on the windows machine.
All that was really needed was UDP port 500 open and protocol 50
enabled. This works for Cisco VPN Client 3.5.1(B) running on a Win98
On Monday 24 February 2003 11:23 am, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
snip
e) tunnels
add the tunnels for net-net and gate-gate
ipsec net 0.0.0.0/0 vpn,vgw
snip
Is this setup esp. shorewall changes secure or did I opened pandoras box?
Thanks for the thorough description!
Le Lundi 24 Février 2003 19:27, H.G. Bekker a écrit :
Hello list,
I am a very happy Bering 1.0 user. Are there any compelling reasons to
upgrade to Bering 1.1?
No unless you need:
1/ A driver only supported in the 2.4.20 kernel (e1000.o for example)
2/ the new features provided in the patched
Thanks Jeff.. In trying to get back to upgrading our routers, I was
experimenting with uClibc, v1.0-2.4.18, and v1.0-2.4.20, and I was using the
cdrom modules from the 2.4.18 tarball. I didn't think that would make a
difference, but alas it did. Thanks again!!
Bob Pocius
I've been fooling around with trying to make shorwall.lrp smaller. By
removing essentially empty files from /etc/shorewall and by stripping
comments from the scripts and from shorewall.conf, I've achieved the
following with the Shorewall 1.4.0 Beta2 candidate:
Before:
-rw-r--r--1 root
From: K.-P. =?iso-8859-15?q?Kirchd=F6rfer?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:23:39 +0100
Subject: [leaf-user] vpn with dynamic ip (long)
Hello;
The problem/situation is:
I have two LEAF routers with dynamic ip's, changing at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg12772.html
Peter Mueller just posted that a while ago. It should be just
what you're looking for. Also today I think he posted an introduction
to himself on the leaf-devel list with a few more thoughts about vrrpd.
If you like chess pieces that
13 matches
Mail list logo
