RE: [leaf-user] reduce load on a bering box

On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:45, Robert Coffman - Info From Data Corporation wrote: > I'm not sure I can help with this, but I'd love to know what hardware you > are running this on. > > Actually, I'd love to hear anyone's input on the capacities of their Bering > boxes, what they are doing with them,

RE: [leaf-user] reduce load on a bering box

On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:02, S Mohan wrote: yes i know. i have removed the ip_conntrack helper modules there (no nat or masq), the point is that ip_conntrack is not a module it's in the kernel. mvh Ronny Aasen > shorewall has a file for including modules that need to be loaded. It also > has f

Re: [leaf-user] reduce load on a bering box

On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:19, Andres Alla wrote: > On Tuesday 02 September 2003 14:33, Ronny Aasen wrote: > > [] > > i need to filter/firewall between the 4 nic's to avoid forwarding > > rfc1918 packets to default gw, and filter access to the router itself. > > evrything else is go > > Have you

RE: [leaf-user] reduce load on a bering box

Ronny For high performance, as your case seems to be, you should probably compile your own kernel to make it as slim as possible. Unnecessary features can be removed that way. Necessary stuff could be compiled into the kernel instead of loading it as a module. cheers Erich At 09:12 03.09.2003

[leaf-user] Could I create routing table filter by protocol???

Hi all I have some problem with my bering box. I am now using bering stable 1.0 with 2 gateways. One is using for web accessing only and the other is using for monitoring my computer at co-location. I would like to set routing table for web access (tcp port 80 and 443) using gateway1 and th

[leaf-user] Port-forwarding

I have installed webmin on my server and needs to forward trafic on port 1. I added this rule to shorewall; Rule "DNAT net loc:192.168.1.200:1 tcp 1" added (and, as this shows - no errors when restarting shorewall) Forwarding port 80 to my webserver is no problem - the rule is the sam

RE: [leaf-user] Bering lost it's NICs

I reported this same problem some months ago. I used Dachstein for a year with no problem. As soon as I changed over to Bering 1.2 the internal NIC would cease responding after it got any kind of a load. Transferring a 1 meg file would do it. No one on the list seemed to have the problem except

Re: [leaf-user] Bering lost it's NICs

That's odd, I have two Bering installations, one regular, once UClibc and both are running 3Com 509B cards. Are your cards the 509 or 509B? I'm not having any problems, but i have access to both type of cards. I could try to recreate the problem at my end with a test machine to narrow down the p

RE: [leaf-user] Bering lost it's NICs

BTW, which driver version are you using? The Donald Becker series or the standard Kernel driver? I think i recall some minor problems related to 3Com nic drivers in the past bu cannot recall right now which ones... > -Original Message- > From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wedn

RE: [leaf-user] Port-forwarding

I believe the line should read: DNAT net loc:192.168.1.200 tcp 1" added (take out :1) chris. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom Harr > Jakobsen > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 5:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

RE: [leaf-user] Bering lost it's NICs

Hi the list, 00:0c.0: 3Com PCI 3c905C Tornado at 0xe000. Vers LK1.1.16 One of my Bering boxes is full of this 3Com NICs (4 x eth). I have again frozen the eth0 PPPoE/ADSL this afternoon But, I don't think that the 3com or its driver are in fault. I use also a Soekris Net4521-30 with DP83815D

[leaf-user] latest wisp release

Hi I make WISP upgrade on my test enviroment to the latest release and I have a some question. After some release I not found the sch_cbq modul but the last public kernel config is contain How can I found source for the latest release? I need the snmp in AccesPoint mode but, I don't query the c

[leaf-user] route external networks

Hi all I am using a bering 1.2 distribution. I have two interfaces iface eth0 inet static address 192.16.202.3 masklen 24 iface eth1 inet static address 172.16.2.5 masklen 24 now, i have to put these routes ip route add 192.168.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link ip route add 172.16.

RE: [leaf-user] route external networks

> ip route add 192.168.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link > ip route add 172.16..0.0/16 dev eth1 scope link > ip route add default via 192.168.202.2 dev eth0 > > where should i put these commands so they can be executed > automatically? /etc/init.d/networking in the start section might be easiest and mo

RE: [leaf-user] Could I create routing table filter by protocol???

Hi Mohan Thanx for ur advice. But could I specific that only "TCP Port 80 and 443" using GW1 and "Other TCP Port" using GW2.. Could It possible??? Thanx so much. -Original Message- From: S Mohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:55 PM To: Thitiporn Por