[leaf-user] ACX100 Dlink 520+ fails with kernel_2.4.20

I tried to build the module, as a matter of fact i built it. But i can't make it works under Bering 1.2 (kernel 2.4.20) I haven't got problem with 2.4.18. The problem with 2.4.20 is that when i install the mod then with iwconfig the device appear like. eth1: no wireless extension. I think i am fo

Re: [leaf-user] Troubleshooting problem with name server on DMZ

--- Charles Steinkuehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > While I realize you won't be hosting Google.com :), > your name server > should at least return an error of some sort (or > correctly resolve the > FQDN under most default bind configurations). > > More troubleshooting could be done with the output

[leaf-user] Alcatel USB

Hello All, Has anyone had any experience on using Bering with Alcatel USB modem. I have a low powered (133Mhz 486) SBC ( www.soekris.com 4501) with a PCI Belkin USB PCI adapter to provide USB support. Works and connects fine - and I can browse - download speeds are as

Re: [leaf-user] RE: leaf-use rDachstein & lrpkg.cfg - BOOT_IMAGE=linux (nf!)

Kevin wrote: I am running a two floppy set and I have three files needed to cover both floppies: Disk 1 pkgpath.cfg /dev/fd0u1440,/dev/fd1u1440 syslinux.cfg display syslinux.dpy timeout 0 default linux append=load_ramdisk=1 initrd=root.lrp initrd_archive=minix ramdisk_size=16384 root=/dev/ram0 boo

Re: [leaf-user] Troubleshooting problem with name server on DMZ

Peter Nosko wrote: pn] I'm preparing to upgrade to Bering, and was trying to refresh my memory of my existing E2B configuration which I haven't touched in quite a while. I recently noticed that my name server was no longer functioning (my domains are quite inactive). I thought I just found the pr

[leaf-user] Troubleshooting problem with name server on DMZ

pn] I'm preparing to upgrade to Bering, and was trying to refresh my memory of my existing E2B configuration which I haven't touched in quite a while. I recently noticed that my name server was no longer functioning (my domains are quite inactive). I thought I just found the problem when I perfor

RE: [leaf-user] Bering lost it's NICs

Hi all the list. Seen what is blocking ! Again eth0 stopped after few hours running. But, this time, I have a little "investigate" around this big problem of reliability. See ip route before accident : 212.180.0.144 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 212.180.113.45 212.180.0.144 dev ipsec

Re: [leaf-user] WAP

Just as a note, my primary reasoning for thinking to put NAT behind NAT - and it wouldn't be an issue, BTW, since many ISP/MSP/MSSP companies, including the one I work for, provide RFC1918 address space for the WAN side and run NAT behind it on the LAN side, because it's all going out a managed

Re: [leaf-user] WAP

My WAP might stand right on the bering box so thats no problem. Looks like third nic is the easiest resolution. I don't know much about squid proxy, and viz sshd (probably requires multiple flopppies or cd), not yet at least I just need WAP for simple browsing internet on laptop. Thanks for al

RE: [leaf-user] WAP

Uhhh, those are subnets. I've heard of scopes only when referencing DHCP/BOOTP for the range of IP's to be serviced. If you're using NetBIOS, which you're not from the looks of it, the scope IDs are further described in RFCs 1001/1002. The scope IDs and subnets are similar concepts, but used with

Re: [leaf-user] WAP

On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 15:24, M Lu wrote: > I am not familiar to the 'scope' thing, but I am sure you do not need the > router, you need only the access point if you connect your WAP to a separate > NIC in the Bering router. I disable the router function in my D-Link 713P. Yes, you can use a sep