Re: [leaf-user] Does ne.o work with Bering Uclib?

2004-03-17 Thread K.-P. Kirchdörfer
Am Mittwoch, 17. März 2004 16:48 schrieb Marko Nurmenniemi: > Tim Wegner wrote: > >Ah so, the solution is to load the crc32 module before the 8390 > >module. This is probably a FAQ that I missed, but if not, this would > >be a good thing to add to the installation docs since it's a > >difference fr

RE: [leaf-user] Is this Hardware more effective than LEAF?

2004-03-17 Thread Joey Officer
I have to agree here. While the idea of using an embedded device that is intended to do a specific job, and do it well, is really nice, I think its also intended for a larger environment. I can see this card being used for a rack of systems that could treat all of these card as a single device, o

Re: [leaf-user] Is this Hardware more effective than LEAF?

2004-03-17 Thread Ben Wang
The difference is, its all set up for you and ready to go. Its alot like any other hardware solution on the market where the OS and settings are done all you need to do is configure it match your own situation. Unless of course that board comes with an onboard encryption processor other than t

Re: [leaf-user] Re: Which Distro for This Firewall/Router?

2004-03-17 Thread Tony
HI Calvin, Bering and Bering uClibc are kissing cousins, so what you find in the original Bering docs are relevant to Bering uClibc. Any differences are noted in the uClibc docs. Check out: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/binstall.html - Bering Install guide http://leaf.sourceforge.net/d

[leaf-user] Re: Which Distro for This Firewall/Router?

2004-03-17 Thread Calvin Webster
Well, I've gotten no responses from the list so I think I'm going with the "Bering-uClibc" distribution since it seems to be more actively maintained than most of the others and apparently can handle the multiple interfaces I'll need. Hopefully, someone will chime in with some pointers when they ge

[leaf-user] Is this Hardware more effective than LEAF?

2004-03-17 Thread joah moat
Hello, I came across this PCI Firewall card: http://www.netmaster.com/products/ggblade.shtml Does this card have any major technical advantages over LEAF? (I know LEAF has the advantage of affordability, but from a layman's standpoint, I'm just curious what are the advantages such a device has

RE: [leaf-user] VPN Suggestions?

2004-03-17 Thread Jorn Eriksen
Hi again, The PPTP daemon that is used in Bering is based on: http://www.poptop.org/ That should be a good startiing point... Jorn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nachman Yaakov Ziskind Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 8:39 PM To: Jorn Erikse

Re: [leaf-user] VPN Suggestions?

2004-03-17 Thread Martin Hejl
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote: I'd like to implement a VPN at work (seems to be the in thing to do); I don't really so much want encryption (but I'll take it :-) as better user authentication (right now, I use TCP Wrappers and firewall rules to keep out undesireables; this is becoming more and more

Re: [leaf-user] VPN Suggestions?

2004-03-17 Thread Nachman Yaakov Ziskind
> -Original Message- > > I'd like to implement a VPN at work (seems to be the in thing to do); I don't > really so much want encryption (but I'll take it :-) as better user > authentication (right now, I use TCP Wrappers and firewall rules to keep out > undesireables; this is becoming more

Re[2]: [leaf-user] kernel panic Bering 2.1

2004-03-17 Thread Yazgot
Hello Ray, March 16th 2004 (01:10:19) you wrote: RO> information about their causes to examine. Even with the complete screenful RO> of stuff you actually saw (the "lots of data"), analysis requires uncommon RO> expertise. Acctually I've got all info from that screen :-) RO> But ... if y

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall Log File Management

2004-03-17 Thread Tom Eastep
On Wednesday 17 March 2004 07:11 am, Tom Eastep wrote: > > When I find the time, I'll clone that description in the shorewall.conf > documentation. > See http://shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Conf -Tom -- Tom Eastep\ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ htt

RE: [leaf-user] Network time synchronization

2004-03-17 Thread Craig Caughlin
Hi folks, This is what I did...and it seems to work O.K. I'm on the West Coast (Sacramento, CA): Place this entry in the TZ file: PST+8PDT,M4.1.0/2,M10.5.0/2 Then, end the line with a newline character (hit enter, or it might not work correctly) if you're using Bering-uClibc. Place the followin

Re: [leaf-user] Does ne.o work with Bering Uclib?

2004-03-17 Thread Marko Nurmenniemi
Tim Wegner wrote: Ah so, the solution is to load the crc32 module before the 8390 module. This is probably a FAQ that I missed, but if not, this would be a good thing to add to the installation docs since it's a difference from Bering, It's not in the FAQ. but it is in the dependencies list

Re: [leaf-user] Network time synchronization

2004-03-17 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 11:00 AM 3/17/2004 +, Shango wrote: I can think of 2 causes: 1. You are sync'ing your Bering box to a timeserver in a different timezone than you, in which case get a server in your location: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/servers.html This is incorrect. ntp works at the UT

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall Log File Management

2004-03-17 Thread Tom Eastep
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 08:48 pm, David Pitts wrote: > > Is there any way to have Shorewall do that itself? I don't really > understand what Lograte and Logburst in Shorewall.conf do. > There is a simple explanation of log rate limiting in the Shorewall Documentation for the rules file (http:

Re: [leaf-user] Network time synchronization

2004-03-17 Thread Erich Titl
Hi At 11:00 17.03.2004 +, Shango wrote: >I can think of 2 causes: > >1. You are sync'ing your Bering box to a timeserver in a different > timezone than you, in which case get a server in your location: > >http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/servers.html NTP servers usually serve U

Re: [leaf-user] Network time synchronization

2004-03-17 Thread Jim TerWee
Shango said: > I can think of 2 causes: > > 1. You are sync'ing your Bering box to a timeserver in a different >timezone than you, in which case get a server in your location: > > http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/servers.html > > > > 2. Your entry in /etc/localtime might be incorrect,

[leaf-user] nameresolution fail with multipath

2004-03-17 Thread Ronny Aasen
hello I am trying to set up an redundant multipath network looks something like this --- --- | gw1 |--| gw2 | -- DEFGW---| | | |-| Laptop | | |--| | --

Re: [leaf-user] Network time synchronization

2004-03-17 Thread Shango
I can think of 2 causes: 1. You are sync'ing your Bering box to a timeserver in a different timezone than you, in which case get a server in your location: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/servers.html 2. Your entry in /etc/localtime might be incorrect, altho' I don't think

RE: [leaf-user] VPN Suggestions?

2004-03-17 Thread Jorn Eriksen
Norman, I've used PPTP for quite some time. It's very stable! The best thing is that it do not require ANY software on W2K / XP machines... Have a look here for details: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/pppd/ Best regards Jorn -Original Message- From: [EM

[leaf-user] Network time synchronization

2004-03-17 Thread Felix Theodor
Dear LEAF friends, I'm using Bering leaf 1.2 it's working fine. Now I'm trying to install ntpdate.lrp to synchronize my network time but some how my time is always one hour late. can someone help me? thank you in advance felix __