Tom,
I followed your suggestion but no result.
I am a little farther however. It seems that the entry is blocked via
the RFC1918 rule list as the error is logdrop:
Apr 15 15:54:15 renault Shorewall:logdrop:DROP: IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=00:01:02:0c:f0:b1:00:05:5f:eb:38:8d:08:00 SRC=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
DST=xxx
Joel Louis Blom wrote:
> Tom,
> I followed your suggestion but no result.
> I am a little farther however. It seems that the entry is blocked via
> the RFC1918 rule list as the error is logdrop:
>
> Apr 15 15:54:15 renault Shorewall:logdrop:DROP: IN=eth0 OUT=
> MAC=00:01:02:0c:f0:b1:00:05:5f:eb:38
>
> To correct this problem.
>
> 1) xtgyo spiteys 988674 flsiey8 http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/yy.htm
> 2) psyyt witii sopom dspslosy
> 3) soppllmo soppoym splo
>
ROTFL!!!
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & ca
Tom,
The link you sent in your email doesn't work!!
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/yy.htm just
returns " The page cannot be
displayed Cannot find server or DNS Error"
This must be an error with shorewall
Thanks in advance,
ADN
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EM
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 08:12 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
> To correct this problem.
>
> 1) xtgyo spiteys 988674 flsiey8 http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/yy.htm
> 2) psyyt witii sopom dspslosy
> 3) soppllmo soppoym splo
There goes another keyboard!
--
Homer Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Homer's H
1. I'm running shorewall 1.4.5.
2. I've put xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx where an individual IP-address written for
security reasons. I don't think that the real IP-adresses are relevant.
I may be a little paranoid but I want to avoid the link of names with
IP-adresses.
3. It's true that I'm wo
Joel Louis Blom wrote:
> 1. I'm running shorewall 1.4.5.
Shorewall 1.4.5 is no longer supported. see http://www.shorewall.net/1.4
> 2. I've put xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx where an individual IP-address written for
> security reasons. I don't think that the real IP-adresses are relevant.
THE REAL IP
Tom,
I'm currently in the process of doing it. Have 3.0 installed and am now
reinstalling the various parameter files. I assume that this also
contains the current RCF1918 file.
Excuse my paranoia.
Joep
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 22:23, Tom Eastep wrote:
> Joel Louis Blom wrote:
> > 1. I'm running sh
Joel Louis Blom wrote:
> Tom,
> I'm currently in the process of doing it. Have 3.0 installed and am now
> reinstalling the various parameter files. I assume that this also
> contains the current RCF1918 file.
> Excuse my paranoia.
3.0 contains Shorewall 2.0.x which separates rfc1918 filtering from