Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall problem

Tom, I followed your suggestion but no result. I am a little farther however. It seems that the entry is blocked via the RFC1918 rule list as the error is logdrop: Apr 15 15:54:15 renault Shorewall:logdrop:DROP: IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:01:02:0c:f0:b1:00:05:5f:eb:38:8d:08:00 SRC=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx DST=xxx

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall problem

Joel Louis Blom wrote: > Tom, > I followed your suggestion but no result. > I am a little farther however. It seems that the entry is blocked via > the RFC1918 rule list as the error is logdrop: > > Apr 15 15:54:15 renault Shorewall:logdrop:DROP: IN=eth0 OUT= > MAC=00:01:02:0c:f0:b1:00:05:5f:eb:38

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall problem

> > To correct this problem. > > 1) xtgyo spiteys 988674 flsiey8 http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/yy.htm > 2) psyyt witii sopom dspslosy > 3) soppllmo soppoym splo > ROTFL!!! --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & ca

RE: [leaf-user] Shorewall problem

Tom, The link you sent in your email doesn't work!! http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/yy.htm just returns " The page cannot be displayed Cannot find server or DNS Error" This must be an error with shorewall Thanks in advance, ADN -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall problem

On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 08:12 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: > To correct this problem. > > 1) xtgyo spiteys 988674 flsiey8 http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/yy.htm > 2) psyyt witii sopom dspslosy > 3) soppllmo soppoym splo There goes another keyboard! -- Homer Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Homer's H

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall problem

1. I'm running shorewall 1.4.5. 2. I've put xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx where an individual IP-address written for security reasons. I don't think that the real IP-adresses are relevant. I may be a little paranoid but I want to avoid the link of names with IP-adresses. 3. It's true that I'm wo

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall problem

Joel Louis Blom wrote: > 1. I'm running shorewall 1.4.5. Shorewall 1.4.5 is no longer supported. see http://www.shorewall.net/1.4 > 2. I've put xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx where an individual IP-address written for > security reasons. I don't think that the real IP-adresses are relevant. THE REAL IP

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall problem

Tom, I'm currently in the process of doing it. Have 3.0 installed and am now reinstalling the various parameter files. I assume that this also contains the current RCF1918 file. Excuse my paranoia. Joep On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 22:23, Tom Eastep wrote: > Joel Louis Blom wrote: > > 1. I'm running sh

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall problem

Joel Louis Blom wrote: > Tom, > I'm currently in the process of doing it. Have 3.0 installed and am now > reinstalling the various parameter files. I assume that this also > contains the current RCF1918 file. > Excuse my paranoia. 3.0 contains Shorewall 2.0.x which separates rfc1918 filtering from