Has anyone on the list successfully modeled a virtual WAN
infrastructure, or at least built a functional LEAF router within UML or
Xen? If so, I'd appreciate any suggestions you may have on the quickest
way to setup this virtual WAN.
I've been looking at 3 different virtualization methods to
I went with the Intel Pro/100 MT Quad Port Server Adapter, but got a
rude surprise after it arrived!
Contrary to all the sales literature, the card will _NOT_ fit in the
standard 32-bit PCI slot, at least not those available in any local PC
hardware, including the passive-backplane industrial
Hello Cpu,
Thanks for your fix. I like some more feedback from other users so this can be
added to ipsec the package. Anyone who can also test this?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: cpu memhd[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19-4-05 18:50:02
To:
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:54 -0400, Calvin Webster wrote:
Has anyone on the list successfully modeled a virtual WAN
infrastructure, or at least built a functional LEAF router within UML or
Xen? If so, I'd appreciate any suggestions you may have on the quickest
way to setup this virtual WAN.
Calvin Webster wrote:
I went with the Intel Pro/100 MT Quad Port Server Adapter, but got a
rude surprise after it arrived!
Contrary to all the sales literature, the card will _NOT_ fit in the
standard 32-bit PCI slot, at least not those available in any local PC
hardware, including the
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 14:00, Alvin Starr wrote:
A solution for lots of ports is to use 802.1q vlans. You do need a
switch capable of vlan managment but you can then have as many ethernet
ports as you want.
I may only need one or two more so that may be a viable option for LANs
with
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 13:59, Arne Bernin wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:54 -0400, Calvin Webster wrote:
Has anyone on the list successfully modeled a virtual WAN
infrastructure, or at least built a functional LEAF router within UML or
Xen? If so, I'd appreciate any suggestions you may
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 16:02 -0400, Calvin Webster wrote:
Thank you for the suggestions Arne.
In my original post I was really looking for the fastest way to get 5
LEAF routers and 5 or 6 minimal client hosts virtualized. I don't really
want to have to spend a lot of time building and
Hello Calvin,
QEMU seems well suited for software development, but for my uses I think
UML or Xen is the way to go. I'm leaning toward UML for now since it
supposedly requires no modification to the guest OS. I don't want to
have to recompile the LEAF distro to get started.
I'm not sure about
Arne and Eric:
Based on your latest info and Eric's note I believe I'll give QEMU a
try. I like the simplicity (i.e. qemu -fda
Bering-uclibc-2.3beta2.img.bin).
I may be picking your brains while I setup the first few machines.
Thank you very much.
--Cal Webster
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 16:57,
10 matches
Mail list logo
