[leaf-user] release date for LEAF Bering-uClibc 3.1 final?

2007-06-05 Thread Bob Ramstad
Hi there, I know I asked this before, but thought I'd run it out there again. Any estimated or actual planned release date for LEAF Bering-uClibc 3.1 final? It's been over two months since the first beta, and there hasn't been a second beta... and when I asked a while back, I think more than a m

Re: [leaf-user] traffic shaping on 3.0.2

2007-04-24 Thread Bob Ramstad
On 4/24/07, Matt Westveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using the basic shorewall traffic shaping - I may have copied extra > modules, but the config seems to work for me on 3.0RC1: > > Uncommented from the /etc/modules file > > # > # Traffic control modules > sch_htb > sch_sfq > sch_ingress > c

[leaf-user] traffic shaping on 3.0.2

2007-04-24 Thread Bob Ramstad
Hi there. Again, upgrading 2.4.2 to 3.0.2 and revisiting some of the issues that I ran into back when I first configured 2.4.2. I'd like to use the shorewall traffic shaping capabilities, and have some nice recipes that are working fine in 2.4.2. >From my 2.4.2 configuration, I gather that to us

[leaf-user] modules on cdrom image 3.0.2

2007-04-24 Thread Bob Ramstad
Hi there. I've been upgrading from 2.4.2 to 3.0.2 and ran into something a bit odd. (Actually a few things, but I will post them separate, as I think that'll make for cleaner responses.) The ISO image for CD for 2.4.2 had a complete unpacked tree of modules available. This allowed me to edit /e

Re: [leaf-user] iptables errors when trying to Shorewall traffic shape with ipp2p

2006-05-12 Thread Bob Ramstad
Everyone, thanks for all your help. To get Example 6 from http://www.shorewall.net/traffic_shaping.htm working on LEAF Bering-uClibc 2.4.1, make sure to load the appropriate modules, namely ipt_CONNMARK and ipt_connmark. The example as written will then work. My tcrules (in entirety): #MARK

Re: [leaf-user] iptables errors when trying to Shorewall traffic shape with ipp2p

2006-05-12 Thread Bob Ramstad
On 5/12/06, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes -- the warnings at the top of the Shorewall traffic shaping > documentation means what they say. > > a) You can't understand Linux traffic shaping by reading just the > Shorewall documentation. > If I've given you the impression that I'm only

Re: [leaf-user] iptables errors when trying to Shorewall traffic shape with ipp2p

2006-05-11 Thread Bob Ramstad
On 5/11/06, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Eastep wrote: > > Bob Ramstad wrote: > >> On 5/11/06, Bob Ramstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I see 22 connections with mark=1 right now, and 7 with mark=0 right > >>> now... and I su

Re: [leaf-user] iptables errors when trying to Shorewall traffic shape with ipp2p

2006-05-11 Thread Bob Ramstad
On 5/11/06, Bob Ramstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see 22 connections with mark=1 right now, and 7 with mark=0 right > now... and I suspect that if all 22 mark=1 connections were being set > to class 50, the system would be behaving as I'd like. I really thought I had it

Re: [leaf-user] iptables errors when trying to Shorewall traffic shape with ipp2p

2006-05-11 Thread Bob Ramstad
> > > On 5/11/06, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Then you will have to use firewall mark classifiers rather than the > > CLASSIFY target directly. > > > > As described in the Shorewall web-site documentation of the > > MARK/CLASSIFY column, when you enter :, you are > > specifying a clas

Re: [leaf-user] iptables errors when trying to Shorewall traffic shape with ipp2p

2006-05-11 Thread Bob Ramstad
On 5/11/06, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bob Ramstad wrote: > > On 5/11/06, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> > >> > >>Now load the ipt_CLASSIFY module > >> > > Bering doesn't seem to have an ip

Re: [leaf-user] iptables errors when trying to Shorewall traffic shape with ipp2p

2006-05-11 Thread Bob Ramstad
On 5/11/06, Bob Ramstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/11/06, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bob Ramstad wrote: > > > Amplifying on my last post, the most recent documentation suggests the > > > following example (slightly modified for

Re: [leaf-user] iptables errors when trying to Shorewall traffic shape with ipp2p

2006-05-11 Thread Bob Ramstad
On 5/11/06, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bob Ramstad wrote: > > Amplifying on my last post, the most recent documentation suggests the > > following example (slightly modified for my situation), but will not > > load: > > > > # version from http:/

Re: [leaf-user] iptables errors when trying to Shorewall traffic shape with ipp2p

2006-05-11 Thread Bob Ramstad
Amplifying on my last post, the most recent documentation suggests the following example (slightly modified for my situation), but will not load: # version from http://www.shorewall.net/IPP2P.html (does not load) #RESTORE:F - - tcp #CONTINUE:F - -

Re: [leaf-user] iptables errors when trying to Shorewall traffic shape with ipp2p

2006-05-11 Thread Bob Ramstad
Two users replied to me (not sure if they also replied to the list) indicating my problem with iptables was due to not loading a needed module. I edited /etc/modules and added ! dir /lib/modules/2.4.32/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter ipt_CONNMARK near the bottom, after I mount my cdrom and before I un

[leaf-user] iptables errors when trying to Shorewall traffic shape with ipp2p

2006-05-11 Thread Bob Ramstad
Hi there. I'm using Bering-uClibc 2.4.1 from CD with configs saved to floppy and have run into a bit of a snag. I want to traffic shape p2p properly and have tried a couple of different things, to no avail. I do have basic traffic shaping working. I started out with the recipe given in the Shor