Re: [leaf-user] 2.3-rc1 without vga

2005-09-17 Thread E . Spakman
Hello Sander, Version bering distribution which I had working before 2.2.3. You mean Bering 1.2? The glibc based? System boot with using rs232 and without video card success, hovever be present next messages. getty: /dev/tty1: cannot open as standard input: No such device getty: /dev/tty2:

Re: [leaf-user] Madwifi drivers for Bering uClibc 2.2.3

2005-09-16 Thread E . Spakman
Hello Jeremy, I have put together a Bering uClibc 2.2.3 router. I have it working just the way I want now except I would also like to add a wireless NIC to serve as an AP. I am using a D Link DWL-G520M which has an Atheros chipset. As I started down this road I realize I have more

Re: [leaf-user] CRC32.o and Tulip in Bering uClibC

2005-09-14 Thread E . Spakman
Hello George, Might I make a suggestion here? There should be some form of documentation, either in the installation doc or on the /etc/modules file, stating that tulip.o for Bering uClibC has dependencies within crc32.o. I spent a profitable couple of hours banging my head on that issue

Re: [leaf-user] 2.3-rc1 without vga

2005-09-13 Thread E . Spakman
Hello Sander, hi. after update to 2.3-rc1 my bering boxes stop booting without video card. anything changed in this version concerned of these? No, nothing changed in that area. The only difference with this kernel in comparison with the previous beta is a patch that makes booting without a

Re: [leaf-user] Booting from USB key...kinda

2005-09-13 Thread E . Spakman
Hello Adam, Did you already had a response to this mail? I'm afraid I can't be of much help, but at least want to give some feedback. Hi all, What a nightmare, I've FINALLY after heaps of stuffing around gotten a machine to boot from my USB key but I'm still having issues that I just can't

Re: [leaf-user] Strange message with V2.3 rc1

2005-09-09 Thread E . Spakman
Hello Bruce, It's very difficult to answer this question without more information. Did you add extra packages or just the plain image, what did you change in the config? Are there other users on the list with the same problem? Eric The message appears on the console a few minutes after

Re: [leaf-user] Strange message with V2.3 rc1

2005-09-03 Thread E . Spakman
Hello Bruce, I have no idea, I don't see the message on my console. Can you check your log files? Maybe there is some extra info in one of those. Please send the relevant parts to the list. Eric Hi Just testing the V2.3rc1 version of Bering uClib and all works well apart from a message I

Re: [leaf-user] packaging problem in Bering-uClib 2.3-rc1.iso

2005-08-28 Thread E . Spakman
Hello Kp, LaRoy, This is the first Bearing package I have used. I have been using Dachstein for several years. I think I found a problem with the location of the tulip driver on the iso download. There is a tulip directory and then the tulip.o driver in the tulip directory.

Re: [leaf-user] Parental Control

2005-08-28 Thread E . Spakman
Herve, Did you use buildtool when you tried to compile the cpp program? It is possible to compile cpp programs with buildtool. Take a look at: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/src/bering-uclibc/contrib/yate/ for an example. We also have a libcxx.lrp package available, which includes

Re: [leaf-user] Parental Control

2005-08-24 Thread E . Spakman
Herve, I am working to make DansGuardian working in bering-uCLibc with no success. Firstly, I am wondering why there is no parental filtering package available with bering-uClibc? I think this functionality would be a nice feature to implement in a router. Did I missed something ? Because

Re: [leaf-user] Back up script suggestion

2005-08-20 Thread E . Spakman
Hello Jaap, Erich, Isn't this already handled by the root.exclude.list? In it e.g. /mnt /mnt? /nfs are listed, so if you'd mount another filesystem there (which seems the obvious choice to me), then you won't have problems backing up root.lrp while your floppy/CF card is mounted. It is,

Re: [leaf-user] Back up script suggestion

2005-08-20 Thread E . Spakman
Hi Arne, Indeed and we don't know which mount directory an user creates. I just mount my CF under /mnt (which also seems obvious to me) and never had a problem. Certainly true, still I believe it is good this had some exposure, because I believe some users were not aware of this. The