Julie,
Bering-uClibc 2.3 uses a newer and different version of ifupdown (the one
from busybox). The difference is that the one from Bering 1.2 only
supported masklen and the one from Bering-uClibc only netmask.
The older ifupdown used a private non standard patch, hence the difference.
Eric
> I
I "guessed" it. Bering 1.2 allowed masklen, but Bering 2.3 used
netmask only. I figured couldn't hurt to try and switch notations.
I suspect other ppl might assume like I did that the masklen notation
still worked.
Tha'ts why I posted this little experience of mine.
--jsl
Arne Bernin wrot
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 14:12 -0700, Julie S. Lin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I had the same problem, I configured my three cards in
> /etc/network/interfaces as follows
> but I got ifup -a error "Don't seem to have all the variables for eth0,
> eth1, eth1"
> when I used masklen notation, if I use netmask, it
Hi
I had the same problem, I configured my three cards in
/etc/network/interfaces as follows
but I got ifup -a error "Don't seem to have all the variables for eth0,
eth1, eth1"
when I used masklen notation, if I use netmask, it works!
auto eth1 (internal interface)
iface eth1 inet static
Hello Ken,
>>
>>
>> Looks ok, are you sure there is a driver loaded for eth0? (lsmod).
>>
>
> Yep, tulip is loaded.
>
Just a note, because it was brought up earlier: did you also load the
crc32 module (it's needed for the tulip driver). I guess you have
otherwise the tulip module wouldn't load at
Ken Gentle wrote:
At 03:33 2005-09-22, you wrote:
Hello Ken,
Looks ok, are you sure there is a driver loaded for eth0? (lsmod).
Yep, tulip is loaded.
You can try to make a fixed config (like you did for eth1) to check if
the
interface is brought up correctly.
The address is supposed
At 03:33 2005-09-22, you wrote:
Hello Ken,
Looks ok, are you sure there is a driver loaded for eth0? (lsmod).
Yep, tulip is loaded.
You can try to make a fixed config (like you did for eth1) to check if the
interface is brought up correctly.
The address is supposed to be assigned dynamica
Hello Ken,
> Hello all -- I must be overlooking something really simple here, but
> I just can't seem to find it.
>
>
> I'm "upgrading" my old 486 based Dachstein system to a PII based
> Bering uClibc and I want to ultimately add a DMZ (moving up from two
> cards to three).
>
> I've got three Link
Hello all -- I must be overlooking something really simple here, but
I just can't seem to find it.
I'm "upgrading" my old 486 based Dachstein system to a PII based
Bering uClibc and I want to ultimately add a DMZ (moving up from two
cards to three).
I've got three LinkSys EtherFast 10/100 pc
