Eric Spakman wrote:
>I'm not 100% certain that it's busybox mount "limitation", but it's my
>best guess. Doing it in fstab is better anyway.
>
>About your suggestion for a default entry in fstab, I don't think that's
>going to work reliable. Not everyone has an USB device mounted on
>/dev/sda1, ma
Hi Izzy;
Am Sonntag, 12. November 2006 23:46 schrieb Izzy Blacklock:
> Thanks Eric,
>
> I forgot that mount was being provided by busybox. Thats probably
> exactly the problem. :) You're right, I should be specifying the
> filesystem type if it's important, but hey, I'm lazy :) The fstab
> opti
Hi Izzy,
> Thanks Eric,
>
>
> I forgot that mount was being provided by busybox. Thats probably
> exactly the problem. :) You're right, I should be specifying the
> filesystem type if it's important, but hey, I'm lazy :) The fstab option
> is probably the best answer, assuming this is a limitat
Thanks Eric,
I forgot that mount was being provided by busybox. Thats probably
exactly the problem. :) You're right, I should be specifying the
filesystem type if it's important, but hey, I'm lazy :) The fstab
option is probably the best answer, assuming this is a limitation of
busybox. I
Hi Izzy,
Note that Debian uses a 'real' mount and Bering-uClibc busybox mount
which doesn't have all the obscure functions of a full mount.
But it's better to always use the -t option anyway and don't rely to
much on automatic guessing. But why not simply make an entry in fstab
? Maybe Debian al
I'm not sure how mount detects what filesystem to use when it isn't
specified in fstab, but it would be very nice if it would detect vfat
instead of fat when I mount the usb thumb drive. I'm assuming it must
be possible because my system (Debian sarge) seems to detect the drive
as vfat. I kno
