Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-25 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Am 24.09.2016 um 14:46 schrieb n22e113: On 9/24/2016 06:05, Erich Titl wrote: Am 24.09.2016 um 09:06 schrieb Andrew: On 24.09.2016 04:22, Erich Titl wrote: I never understood why the standard resolver file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would write to

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-25 Thread Andrew
On 24.09.2016 13:05, Erich Titl wrote: > Am 24.09.2016 um 09:06 schrieb Andrew: >> Hi. >> >> On 24.09.2016 04:22, Erich Titl wrote: >>> I never understood why the standard resolver >>> file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would >>> write to /etc/resolv.conf and dnsmasq

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-24 Thread Jean-Roch Blais
> I personally don't like the concept of writing to > /etc/dhcpc/resolv.conf. I never understood why the standard resolver > file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would > write to /etc/resolv.conf and dnsmasq would read from it (as it does on > my installation) does

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-24 Thread n22e113
On 9/24/2016 06:05, Erich Titl wrote: > Am 24.09.2016 um 09:06 schrieb Andrew: >> On 24.09.2016 04:22, Erich Titl wrote: >>> I never understood why the standard resolver >>> file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would >>> write to /etc/resolv.conf and dnsmasq would read

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-24 Thread Erich Titl
Am 24.09.2016 um 09:06 schrieb Andrew: > Hi. > > On 24.09.2016 04:22, Erich Titl wrote: >> I never understood why the standard resolver >> file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would >> write to /etc/resolv.conf and dnsmasq would read from it (as it does on >> my

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-24 Thread Andrew
Hi. On 24.09.2016 04:22, Erich Titl wrote: > I never understood why the standard resolver > file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would > write to /etc/resolv.conf and dnsmasq would read from it (as it does on > my installation) then all this would is moot, because

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-23 Thread Erich Titl
Am 23.09.2016 um 20:43 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: > >> Le 23 sept. 2016 à 07:36, Erich Titl a écrit : >> >> Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl: >>> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: >> ... >>> >>> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-23 Thread Jean-Roch Blais
> Le 23 sept. 2016 à 07:36, Erich Titl a écrit : > > Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: >>> > ... >> >> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies, >> often they do not and I don't know

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-23 Thread Andrew
Hi. Why resolv.conf is missing in that case? On 23.09.2016 14:36, Erich Titl wrote: > Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: > ... >> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies, >> often they do not and I don't

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-23 Thread Erich Titl
Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: >> ... > > As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies, > often they do not and I don't know if dnsmasq does. The drawback of the > bazaar model often is the lack of precise