Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
>>
...
>
> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies,
> often they do not and I don't know if dnsmasq does. The drawback of the
> bazaar model often is the lack of precise specs
Hi.
Why resolv.conf is missing in that case?
On 23.09.2016 14:36, Erich Titl wrote:
> Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
> ...
>> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies,
>> often they do not and I don't know
> Le 23 sept. 2016 à 07:36, Erich Titl a écrit :
>
> Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
>>>
> ...
>>
>> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies,
>> often they do not and I don't know if dnsmasq does. The d
Am 23.09.2016 um 20:43 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
>
>> Le 23 sept. 2016 à 07:36, Erich Titl a écrit :
>>
>> Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl:
>>> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
>> ...
>>>
>>> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies,
>>> o
Hi.
On 24.09.2016 04:22, Erich Titl wrote:
> I never understood why the standard resolver
> file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would
> write to /etc/resolv.conf and dnsmasq would read from it (as it does on
> my installation) then all this would is moot, because /etc
Am 24.09.2016 um 09:06 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
>
> On 24.09.2016 04:22, Erich Titl wrote:
>> I never understood why the standard resolver
>> file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would
>> write to /etc/resolv.conf and dnsmasq would read from it (as it does on
>> my instal
On 9/24/2016 06:05, Erich Titl wrote:
> Am 24.09.2016 um 09:06 schrieb Andrew:
>> On 24.09.2016 04:22, Erich Titl wrote:
>>> I never understood why the standard resolver
>>> file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would
>>> write to /etc/resolv.conf and dnsmasq would read
> I personally don't like the concept of writing to
> /etc/dhcpc/resolv.conf. I never understood why the standard resolver
> file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would
> write to /etc/resolv.conf and dnsmasq would read from it (as it does on
> my installation)
does th
On 24.09.2016 13:05, Erich Titl wrote:
> Am 24.09.2016 um 09:06 schrieb Andrew:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On 24.09.2016 04:22, Erich Titl wrote:
>>> I never understood why the standard resolver
>>> file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would
>>> write to /etc/resolv.conf and dnsmasq
Hi
Am 24.09.2016 um 14:46 schrieb n22e113:
On 9/24/2016 06:05, Erich Titl wrote:
Am 24.09.2016 um 09:06 schrieb Andrew:
On 24.09.2016 04:22, Erich Titl wrote:
I never understood why the standard resolver
file was not used, but this is all personal preference. If dhcpcd would
write to /etc/res
10 matches
Mail list logo