see that 40-50 mbps even
with a 100 MHZ processor.
Conclusion: T1 okay, T3 probably not.
"Charles Steinkuehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/25/2002 02:29:17 PM
To: "John Mullan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx)
Oops...forgot to include the list in the first reply :<
> A friend of mine is ordering in a 3mbps line (for his new small
> business) from the telco. Obviously then, a 10/100 NIC on a LEAF system
> should be able to keep up with this. Right? IE; 10 is much bigger than
> 3.
Yes, almost any LEA
If you can find a shell of a system, all you really need is a power supply,
a floppy, and a riser card w/ two pci slots on it. My guess is you could
find all of that for sub $300US.
Here is one I found fairly quickly, just need to add the necessary parts
http://www.mpcparts.com/prodspecs/050129
Paul Rimmer wrote:
> ** Speed 2325(down)/1034(up) kbps **
> ** Speed 2925(down)/947(up) kbps **
> P133 64MB RAM DCDv1.01 with brand new Motorola cable modem (old one was
> definitely slower).
> I'd be curious to see what other cable modem users are getting and what
> their config is.
@home
Hi Paul, Hi all
I think that using a bridging cable modem with LEAF don't decrease speed at
all, even you're using a 486 CPU.
What I know is that using PPPoE is much more CPU intensive than just
masq'in.
I'm using several boxes out there, all with a 512Kbit/128Kbit link (you
don't get a faster
